Ecological Research

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 207–215

Effects of fragmentation on parasite burden (nematodes) of generalist and specialist small mammal species in secondary forest fragments of the coastal Atlantic Forest, Brazil

  • Thomas Püttker
  • Yvonne Meyer-Lucht
  • Simone Sommer
Original Article

Abstract

Parasites are considered to play an important role in the regulation of wild animal populations. We investigated parasite burden of gastrointestinal nematodes and body condition in specialist and generalist small mammal species in secondary forest fragments in the highly endangered coastal Atlantic Forest. We hypothesized that body condition decreases with increasing parasite load and that parasite burden increases with increasing fragmentation in specialist species but not in generalist species as a consequence of differing responses to fragmentation effects. Investigated species were Akodon montensis, Oligoryzomys nigripes, and Delomys sublineatus (rodents) and the marsupials Marmosops incanus and Gracilinanus microtarsus. Prevalence of parasites was high in all species except for the arboreal G. microtarsus, presumably because of decreased infection probability. No correlation was found between body condition and parasite load in any of the species. Contrary to our expectations, body condition of the specialists D. sublineatus and M. incanus increased in both species with increasing fragmentation. In D. sublineatus, parasite burden increased and body condition decreased in fragments with relatively high density probably due to increased contact rates and facilitation of infection with nematodes. In all generalist species, low or no correlation between parasite burden and fragmentation was detected, suggesting little effect of fragmentation on population health.

Keywords

Fragmentation Gastrointestinal nematodes Coastal Atlantic Forest Rodents Marsupials 

References

  1. Albon SD, Stien A, Irvine RJ, Langvatn R, Ropstad E, Halvorsen O (2002) The role of parasites in the dynamics of a reindeer population. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:1625–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan BF, Keesing F, Ostfeld RS (2003) Effect of forest fragmentation on Lyme disease risk. Conserv Biol 17:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson RM, May RM (1979) Population biology of infectious deseases: part I. Nature 280:361–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres JM, Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB, Queiroz HL, Pinto LP, Masterson D, Cavalcanti RB (2005) Os corredores ecológicos das florestas tropicais do Brasil. Sociedade Civil Mamariauá, BelémGoogle Scholar
  5. Behnke JM, Lewis JW, Zain SN, Gilbert FS (1999) Helminth infections in Apodemus sylvaticus in southern England: interactive effects of host age, sex, and year on the prevalence and abundance of infections. J Helminthol 73:31–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolin TD, Davis AE, Cummings AG, Duncombe VM, Kelly JD (1977) Effect of iron and protein deficiency on the expulsion of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis from the small intestine of the rat. Gut 18:182–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonvicino CR, Lindbergh SM, Maroja LS (2002) Small non-flying mammals from conserved and altered areas of Atlantic Forest and Cerrado: comments on their potential use for monitoring environment. Braz J Biol 62:765–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer S, Reimánek M (1999) Small rodents as significant dispersers of tree seeds in a neotropical forest. J Veg Sci 10:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bush AO, Fernández JC, Esch GW, Seed JR (2001) Parasitism—the diversity and ecology of animal parasites. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Coltman D, Pilkington J, Smith J, Pemberton J (1999) Parasite-mediated selection against inbred soay sheep in a free-living, island population. Evolution 53:1259–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coop RL, Holmes PH (1996) Nutrition and parasite interaction. Int J Parasitol 26:951–962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalmagro AD, Vieira EM (2005) Patterns of habitat utilization of small rodents in an area of araucaria forest in southern Brazil. Austral Ecol 30:353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Decker KH, Duszynski DW, Patrick MJ (2001) Biotic and abiotic effects on endoparasites infecting Dipodomys and Perognathus species. J Parasitol 87:300–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Delahay RJ, Daniels MJ, Macdonald DW, McGuire K, Balharry D (1998) Do patterns of helminth parasitism differ between groups of wild-living cats in Scotland? J Zool 245:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Díaz M, Alonso CL (2003) Wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus winter food supply: density, condition, breeding, and parasites. Ecology 84:2680–2691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Díaz M, Santos T, Tellería JL (1999) Effects of forest fragmentation on the winter body condition and population parameters of a habitat generalist, the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus: a test of hypotheses. Acta Oecol 20:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehman KD, Scott ME (2002) Female mice mate preferentially with non-parasitized males. Parasitology 125:461–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emmons LH, Feer F (1997) Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Fonseca GAB, Kierulff MCM (1989) Biology and natural history of Brazilian Atlantic Forest small mammals. Bull Florida St Mus Biol Sci 34:99–152Google Scholar
  20. Fonseca GAB, Herrmann G, Leite YLR, Mittermeier RA, Rylands AB, Patton JL (1996) Lista anotada dos mamíferos do Brasil. Occas Papers Conserv Biol 4:1–38Google Scholar
  21. Forget P-M (1991) Evidence for secondary seed dispersal by rodents in Panama. Oecologia 87:596–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forget P-M (1993) Post-dispersal predation and scatterhoarding of Dipteryx panamensis (Papilionaceae) seeds by rodents in Panama. Oecologia 94:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forget P-M, Milleron T, Feer F, Henry O, Dubost G (2000) Effects of dispersal pattern and mammalian herbivores on seedling recruitment for Virola mechelii (Myristicaceae) in French Guiana. Biotropica 32:452–462Google Scholar
  24. Galindo-Leal C, de Gusmão Câmara I (2003) The Atlantic Forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Gbakima AA (1993) The effects of dietary protein on Trichinella spiralis infection and inflammatory reactions in the tongue in CD1 mice. Nutr Res 13:787–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillespie TR, Chapman CA (2006) Prediction of parasite infection dynamics in primate metapopulations based on attributes of forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol 20:441–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gillespie TR, Chapman CA, Greiner EC (2005) Effects of logging on gastrointestinal parasite infections and infection risk in African primates. J Appl Ecol 42:699–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Godoy Teixeira AMd (2005) Análise da dinâmica da paisagem e de processos de fragmentação e regeneração na região de Caucaia-do-Alto. SP (1962–2000). University of São Paulo, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  29. Gordon HM, Whitlock HV (1939) A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. J Counc Sci Ind Res Austr 12:50–52Google Scholar
  30. Gregory RD (1991) Parasite epidemiology and host population growth: Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) in enclosed wood mouse populations. J Anim Ecol 60:805–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gregory RD, Blackburn TM (1991) Parasite prevalence and host sample size. Parasitol Today 7:316–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guyer C (1988) Food supplementation in a tropical mainland anole, Norops humilis: demographic effects. Ecology 69:350–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harf R, Sommer S (2005) Association between major histocompatibility complex class II DRB alleles and parasite load in the hairy-footed gerbil, Gerbillus paeba, in the southern Kalahari. Mol Ecol 14:85–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haukisalmi V, Henttonen H (2000) Variability of helminth assemblages and populations in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Pol J Ecol 48:219–231Google Scholar
  35. Haukisalmi V, Henttonen H, Vikman P (1996) Variability of sex ratio, mating probability and egg production in an intestinal nematode in its fluctuating host population. Int J Parasit 26:755–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hugot J-P, Baujard P, Morand S (2001) Biodiversity in helminths and nematodes as a field of study: an overview. Nematology 3:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Janos DP, Sahley CT (1995) Rodent dispersal of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Amazonian Peru. Ecology 76:1852–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kavaliers M, Choleris E, Pfaff DW (2005) Genes, odours and the recognition of parasitized individuals by rodents. Trends Parasitol 21:423–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krebs CJ (1966) Demographic changes in fluctuating populations of Microtus californicus. Ecol Monogr 36:239–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kristan DM (2002) Maternal and direct effects of the intestinal nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus on offspring growth and susceptibility to infection. J Exp Biol 205:3967–3977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kristan DM, Hammond KA (2000) Combined effects of cold exposure and sub-lethal intestinal parasites on host morphology and physiology. J Exp Biol 203:3495–3504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kristan DM, Hammond KA (2001) Parasite infection and caloric restriction induce physiological and morphological plasticity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281:502–510Google Scholar
  43. Koski KG, Scott ME (2001) Gastrointestinal nematodes, nutrition and immunity: breaking the negative spiral. Annu Rev Nutr 21:297–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin Y-TK, Batzli GO (2001) The influence of habitat quality on dispersal, demography, and population dynamics of voles. Ecol Monogr 71:245–275Google Scholar
  45. Macdonald DW (1996) Dangerous liaisons and disease. Nature 379:400–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marchand H, Paillat G, Montuire S, Butet A (2003) Fluctuating asymmetry in bank vole populations (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) reflects stress caused by landscape fragmentation in the Mont-Saint-Michel Bay. Biol J Linn Soci 80:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martins EG, Bonato V (2004) On the diet of Gracilinanus microtarsus (Marsupialia, Didelphidae) in an Atlantic rainforest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Mamm Biol 69:58–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. May RM, Anderson DR (1979) Population biology of infectious deseases: part II. Nature 280:455–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meyer-Lucht Y, Sommer S (2005) MHC diversity and the association to nematode parasitism in the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis). Mol Ecol 14:2233–2243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morand S, Poulin R (1998) Density, body mass and parasite species richness of terrestrial mammals. Evol Ecol 12:717–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murray DL, Cary JR, Keith LB (1997) Interactive effects of sublethal nematodes and nutritional status on snowshoe hare vulnerability to predation. J Anim Ecol 66:250–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Murray DL, Keith LB, Cary JR (1998) Do parasitism and nutritional status interact to affect production in snowshoe hares? Ecology 79:1209–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Musser GG, Carleton MD (1993) Family Muridae. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 501–753Google Scholar
  54. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nitikman LZ, Mares MA (1987) Ecology of small mammals in a gallery forest of Central Brazil. Ann Carnegie Mus 56:75–95Google Scholar
  56. Nunn CL, Altizer S, Jones KE, Sechrest W (2003) Comparative tests of parasite species richness in primates. Am Nat 162:597–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Oliveira-Filho AT, Fontes MAL (2000) Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic forests in Southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 32:793–810Google Scholar
  58. Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl Monogr 62:5–135Google Scholar
  59. Pardini R, Marques de Souza S, Braga-Neto R, Metzger JP (2005) The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic Forest landscape. Biol Conserv 124:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paterson S, Wilson K, Pemberton J (1998) Major histocompatibility complex variation associated with juvenile survival and parasite resistance in a large unmanaged ungulate population (Ovis aries L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3714–3719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pimentel DS, Tabarelli M (2004) Seed dispersal of the palm Attalea oleifera in a remnant of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biotropica 36:74–84Google Scholar
  62. Pizo MA (1997) Seed dispersal and predation in two populations of Cabralea canjerana (Meliaceae) in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil. J Trop Ecol 13:559–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Poulin R (1996) Sexual inequalities in Helminth infections: a cost of being a male? Am Midl Nat 147:287–295Google Scholar
  64. Poulin R (1999) The functional importance of parasites in animal communities: many roles at many levels? Int J Parasitol 29:903–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ross JLS, Moroz IC (1997) Mapa Geomorfológico do Estado de São Paulo: escala 1:500.000. FFLCH-USP, PT and Fapesp, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  66. Rossin A, Malizia AI (2002) Relationship between helminth parasites and demographic attributes of a population of the subterranean rodent Ctenomys talarum (Rodentia: Octodontidae). J Parasitol 88:1268–1270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sánchez-Cordero V, Martínez-Gallardo R (1998) Postdispersal fruit and seed removal by forest-dwelling rodents in a lowland rainforest in Mexico. J Trop Ecol 14:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Zinner B, Millar JS, Hickling GJ (2005) Restitution of mass-size residuals: validating body condition indices. Ecology 86:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwaiger FW, Gostomski D, Stear MI (1995) An ovine major histocompatibility complex DRB1 allele is associated with low fecal egg counts following natural, predominantly Ostertagia circumcincta, infection. Int J Parasitol 25:815–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stear MJ, Bairden K, Duncan JL, Holmes PH, McKellar QA, Park M, Strain S, Murray M, Bishop SC, Gettinby G (1997) How hosts control worms. Nature 389:27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stien A, Irvine RJ, Ropstad E, Halvorsen O, Langvatn R, Albon SD (2002) The impact of gastrointestinal nematodes on wild reindeer: experimental and cross-sectional studies. J Anim Ecol 71:937–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tabarelli M, Pinto LP, Silva JMC, Hirota M, Bedê L (2005) Challenges and opportunities for biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Conserv Biol 19:695–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Terborgh J (1992) Maintenance of diversity in tropical forests. Biotropica 24:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tripet F, Richner H (1997) Host responses to ectoparasites: food compensation by parent blue tits. Oikos 78:557–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tyndale-Biscoe H (2005) Life of marsupials. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  76. Umetsu F, Pardini R (2007) Small mammals in a mosaic of forest remnants and anthropogenic habitats—evaluating matrix quality in an Atlantic forest landscape. Landsc Ecol (in press). doi: 10.1007/s10980-006-9041-yGoogle Scholar
  77. Vieira EM, Izar P (1999) Interactions between aroids and arboreal mammals in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Plant Ecol 145:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vieira EM, Pizo MA, Izar P (2003) Fruit and seed exploitation by small rodents of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mammalia 67:533–539Google Scholar
  79. Wilson KR, Anderson DR (1985) Evaluation of two density estimators of small mammal population size. J Mammal 66:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yuill TM (1987) Diseases as components of mammalian ecosystems: mayhem and subtlety. Can J Zool 65:1061–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Püttker
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yvonne Meyer-Lucht
    • 1
    • 2
  • Simone Sommer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Animal Ecology and ConservationUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research (IZW)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations