Ecological Research

, 23:121

Spatial distribution of turtle barnacles on the green sea turtle, Chelonia mydas

Original Article

Abstract

Distribution patterns of epibiotic barnacles on green sea turtles were investigated in waters neighboring Okinawa, Japan. A number of barnacle species were found to coexist on the turtles and were classified into three genera: Chelonibia, Platylepas and Stomatolepas. Attachment sites on the turtles varied among the barnacle species, suggesting that there is niche partitioning with respect to their microhabitat selection. Turtle bodies offer a “patchy” environment for barnacles, so we also analyzed coexistence patterns in the context of an aggregation model. Within each genus, individual barnacles showed a clumped distribution. The different genera do not have mutually exclusive distribution patterns, but instead occur on the same turtle to various degrees. However, when turtles were divided into two size classes, both the level of aggregation and the degree of interspecific overlap among the barnacles was significantly lower on large turtles. We suggest that obtaining basic information on turtle epibionts will shed light on the biology of wild turtles, which is still largely unknown.

Keywords

Coexistence Patchy environment Turtle barnacles Green turtle Aggregation model 

References

  1. Atkinson W, Shorrocks B (1981) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: a simulation model. J Anim Ecol 50:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choy BK, Balas GH, Daily MA (1989) A new therapy for marine turtles parasitized by the piccolo leech, Ozobranchus branchiate. Herpetol Rev 20(4):89Google Scholar
  3. Davenport J (1994) A cleaning association between the oceanic crab Planes minutes and the loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 74:735–737Google Scholar
  4. Hirate K, Kimura M (1996) Occurence of the “lost age” green turtle in Ryukyu island, Japan (In Japanese). Umigame Newslett Japan 29:10Google Scholar
  5. Ives AR (1988) Aggregation and the coexistence of competitions. Ann Zool Fenn 25:75–88Google Scholar
  6. Iwasaki K (1993) Synergistic effects of mixed grazing by intertidal limpets on sessile organisms: consequences of differences in grazing ability and feeding habit. Physiol Ecol Jpn 30:1–30Google Scholar
  7. Kinne O (1985) Disease of marine animals, vol 4, part 2. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, p 543Google Scholar
  8. Kitsos MS, Christodoulou M, Arvanitidis C, Mavidis M, Kirmitzoglou I, Koukouras A (2005) Composition of the organismic assemblage associated with Careta caretta. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 85:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Matsuura I, Nakamura K (1993) Attachement pattern of the turtle barnacle Chelonibia testudinaria on carapace of nesting loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta. Nippon Suisan Gakkai Shi 59(10):1803Google Scholar
  10. Monroe R, Limpus CJ (1979) Barnacles on turtles in Queensland waters with descriptions of three new species. Mem Qd Mus 19(3):197–223Google Scholar
  11. Moore PG (1995) Podocerus chelonophilus (Amphipoda: Podoceridae) associated with epidermal lesions of the loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta (Chelonia). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 75:253–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Seveneter J (1996) Aggregation and coexistence. I. Theory and analysis. J Anim Ecol 65:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shorrocks B, Atkinson W, Charlesworth P (1979) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource. J Anim Ecol 48:799–806Google Scholar
  15. Sokal RB, Rohlf FJ (1994) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, pp 820–824Google Scholar
  16. Utinomi H (1969) Cirripedia of the Iranian Gulf. Vidensk Medd Dansk Naturh Foren 132:79–94Google Scholar
  17. Van Buskirk J, Crowder LB (1994) Life-history variation in marine turtles. Copeia 1994:66–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Historical Geology and PaleontologyChiba UniversityChibaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Sciences and Technology, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations