Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 767–773 | Cite as

Habitat preferences of an endangered insect species, Cepero’s ground-hopper (Tetrix ceperoi)

  • Julia Gröning
  • Sascha Krause
  • Axel Hochkirch
Original Article

Abstract

Preventing the global decline in biodiversity is a major task for conservation biologists. Although habitat loss has been identified as a key factor driving extinction processes, our knowledge on the habitat requirements of many endangered species, particularly invertebrates, is still sparse. We present a feasible method to study the microhabitat preferences of insect species. In Central Europe, the endangered Cepero’s ground-hopper, Tetrix ceperoi, is believed to have its only remaining natural habitats in dune slacks of the Wadden Sea Islands. Our results suggest that this species performs an active habitat choice of damp, bare patches with high temperatures. While ponds and fens in dune slacks provide large areas of damp bare ground and algal mats, grasslands, degraded dune slacks and the transitional zone between salt marsh and dunes are less suited as habitats. The major threat for T. ceperoi is found in the succession of its pioneer habitats due to the reduced natural dynamics. In industrialized countries, pioneer habitats and species are threatened substantially by coastal protection and floodplain regulation. This is only compensated in part by anthropogenic creation of secondary habitats, such as different kinds of pits or coal heaps. Nevertheless, there is a strong need for restoration of dynamic habitats by floodplain revitalization and dune slack restoration.

Keywords

Dune slacks Extinction Floodplains Insect conservation Restoration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank J. Kochmann for help with collecting field data. Access to the study sites was kindly permitted by the district government Weser-Ems (National Park Administration). We are grateful to the Division of Ecology at the University of Osnabrück for providing research facilities and financial support. T. Eggers gave essential advice regarding statistics and valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also wish to thank A. Kratochwil for his constant support and encouragement throughout this project. This study was financially supported by the Division of Ecology at the University of Osnabrück, the Foundation of Gerhard ten Doornkaat-Kohlmann (grant to S. Krause) and the GradFöG (Graduiertenförderung des Landes Niedersachsen), a postgraduate studentship to J. Gröning.

References

  1. Adamovic ZR (1969) Habitat relationships of some closely related species of Tetrigidae, Orthoptera. Ekologija 4:165–184Google Scholar
  2. Anderson RV, Tracy CR, Abramsky Z (1979) Habitat selection in two species of short-horned grasshoppers. Oecologia 38:359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastow JL, Sabo JL, Finlay JC, Power ME (2002) A basal aquatic-terrestrial trophic link in rivers: algal subsidies via shore-dwelling grasshoppers. Oecologia 131:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chappell MA, Whitman DW (1990) Grasshopper thermoregulation. In: Chapman RF, Joern A (eds) Biology of grasshoppers. Wiley, New York, pp 143–172Google Scholar
  5. Clavero M, García-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley MJ (2005) Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG (2003) Gains and losses of French butterflies: tests of predictions, under-recording and regional extinction from data in a new atlas. Biol Conserv 110:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Detzel P (1998) Die Heuschrecken Baden-Württembergs. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn RR (2005) Modern insect extinctions, the neglected majority. Conserv Biol 19:1030–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Greenwood JJD, Gregory RD, Quinn RM, Lawton JH (2000) Abundance–occupancy relationships. J Appl Ecol 37:39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grein G (2005) Rote Liste der in Niedersachsen und Bremen gefährdeten Heuschrecken, 3. Fassung, Inf dienst Nat schutz Niedersachs 25:1–20Google Scholar
  13. Gröning J, Kochmann K, Hochkirch A (2005) Ground-hoppers (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) on the East Frisian Islands (Germany, Lower Saxony), with notes on their distribution, coexistence and ecology. Entomol Heute 17:47–63Google Scholar
  14. Grootjans AP, Everts H, Bruin K, Fresco L (2001) Restoration of wet dune slacks on the Dutch Wadden Sea Islands: recolonization after large-scale sod cutting. Restor Ecol 9:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grootjans AP, Geelen HWT, Jansen AJM, Lammerts EJ (2002) Restoration of coastal dune slacks in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 478:181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haig SM, Ferland CL, Cuthbert FJ, Dingledine J, Goossen JP, Hecht A, McPhillips N (2005) A complete species census and evidence for regional declines in piping plovers. J Wildl Manage 69:160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hochkirch A, Deppermann J, Gröning J (2006) Visual communication behavior as a mechanism behind reproductive interference in three pygmy grasshoppers (genus Tetrix, Tetrigidae, Orthoptera). J Insect Behav. DOI 10.1007/s10905-006-9043-2Google Scholar
  18. Hochkirch A, Gröning J, Loos T, Metzing C, Reichelt M (2000) Specialized diet and feeding habits as key factors for the habitat requirements of the grasshopper species Tetrix subulata (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae). Entomol Gen 25:39–51Google Scholar
  19. Hochkirch A, Zimmermann M, Keithahn C, Länder S, Peiter A, Folger-Rüter M, Harmuth C, Vogt S, Zimmermann M, Hellwig F, Gulau A, Mühl H (2002) A field study of the escape behaviour of Tetrix subulata (Linnaeus, 1758) and Tetrix tenuicornis (Sahlberg, 1893) (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae). Articulata 17:19–31Google Scholar
  20. Ingrisch S (1980) Zur Feuchte-Präferenz von Feldheuschrecken und ihren Larven (Insecta:Acrididae). Verh Ges Ökol 8:403–410Google Scholar
  21. Ingrisch S (1983) Neue Arten und faunistisch bemerkenswerte Nachweise von Orthopteren auf Sardinien. Nachrichtenbl Bayer Entomol 32:88–94Google Scholar
  22. Ingrisch S, Frye L, Grenz M, Simmat U (1988) Neue Funde von Tetrix ceperoi in Deutschland. Dtsche Entomol Z 35:24–29Google Scholar
  23. Ingrisch S, Köhler G (1998) Rote Liste der Geradflügler (Orthoptera s. l.). In: Binot M, Bless R, Boye P, Gruttke H, Pretscher P (eds) Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere Deutschlands. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster, pp 252–254Google Scholar
  24. Karaman MS (1960) Tetrigidae Mazedoniens. Zastita Bilja 58:145–161Google Scholar
  25. Kindvall O, Vessby K, Berggren A, Hartman G (1998) Individual mobility prevents an Allee effect in sparse populations of the bush cricket Metrioptera roeseli: an experimental study. Oikos 81:449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kleukers R, v. Nieukerken E, Odé B, Willemse L, v. Wingerden W (1997) De Sprinkhanen en Krekels van Nederland (Orthoptera). Nederlandse Fauna I. KNNV Uitgeverij and EIS-Nederland, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  27. Koen L (1996) Ecologische studie over het activiteitenpatroon en de voeding van Tetrix subulata (L.). Saltabel 16:30–36Google Scholar
  28. Köhler G (2001) Fauna der Heuschrecken (Caelifera et Ensifera) des Freistaates Thüringen. Naturschutzreport No. 17Google Scholar
  29. Krüner U (1993) Die Heuschreckenfauna der Bergehalde Carolus Magnus, Übach-Palenberg im Kreis Heinsberg. Natur Niederrhein 8:73–76Google Scholar
  30. Kühnelt W (1943) Über Beziehungen zwischen Tier- und Pflanzengesellschaften. Biologia Generalis 17:566–593Google Scholar
  31. Maas S, Detzel P, Staudt A (2002) Gefährdungsanalyse der Heuschrecken Deutschlands—Verbreitungsatlas, Gefährdungseinstufung und Schutzkonzepte. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn–Bad GodesbergGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall JA, Haes ECM (1988) Grasshoppers and allied insects of Great Britain and Ireland. Harley Books, ColchesterGoogle Scholar
  33. Oksanen J, Kindt R, O’Hara B (2005) The vegan package. http://www.cc.oulu.fi/∼jarioksa/. Cited 18 Apr 2006
  34. Paranjape SY, Bhalerao AM, Naidu NM (1987) On etho-ecological characteristics and phylogeny of Tetrigidae. In: Bacetti BM (ed) Evolutionary biology of orthopteroid insects. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp 386–395Google Scholar
  35. Petersen J (1999) Die Dünentalvegetation der Wattenmeer-Inseln in der südlichen Nordsee. Eine pflanzensoziologische und ökologische Vergleichsuntersuchung unter Berücksichtigung von Nutzung und Naturschutz. Husum Druck- und Verlagsgesellschaft, HusumGoogle Scholar
  36. Primack RB (2002) Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  37. R Development Core Team (2005) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. Cited 11 Jul 2005
  38. Ricketts TH, Dinerstein E, Boucher T, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Morrison J, Parr M, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL, Sechrest W, Wallace GE, Berlin K, Bielby J, Burgess ND, Church DR, Cox N, Knox D, Loucks C, Luck GW, Master LL, Moore R, Naidoo R, Ridgely R, Schatz GE, Shire G, Strand H, Wettengel W, Wikramanayake E (2005) Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 51:18497–18501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Samways MJ (2005) Insect diversity conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Sänger K (1977) Über die Beziehung zwischen Heuschrecken und der Raumstruktur ihrer Habitate. Zool Jahrb Abt Syst Oekol Geogr Tiere 104:433–488Google Scholar
  41. Szövényi G (2002) Qualification of grassland habitats based on their Orthoptera assemblages in the Koszeg Mountains (W-Hungary). Entomol Exp Appl 104:159–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, de Siqueira MF, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004): Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thorens P, Nadig A (1997) Atlas de distribution des Orthopteres de Suisse. CSCF, NeuchâtelGoogle Scholar
  44. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Valen L (1965) Morphological variation and width of ecological niche. Am Nat 908:377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Voisin J-F (2003) Atlas des Orthoptères (Insecta: Orthoptera) et des Mantides (Insecta: Mantodea) de France. Patrimoines Naturels 60:1–104Google Scholar
  48. Whitman DW (1987) Thermoregulation and daily activity patterns in a black desert grasshopper, Taenipoda eques. Anim Behav 35:1814–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson EO (1988) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Biology/Chemistry, Division of EcologyUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations