Advertisement

Ecological Research

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 665–670 | Cite as

Interaction between flowers, ants and pollinators: additional evidence for floral repellence against ants

  • Robert Junker
  • Arthur Y. C. Chung
  • Nico BlüthgenEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

It has been commonly suggested that ants negatively affect plant pollination, particularly in the tropics. We studied ant–flower–pollinator interactions in a lowland rainforest in Borneo. Frequency and duration of pollinator visits were compared between flowers attended by ants and flowers from which ants were excluded. In all four plant species studied, the activity of ants decreased the rate and/or duration of the pollinators’ floral visits. For this and other reasons it is expected that plants repel ants from flowers during anthesis. We tested this prediction for a different set of plant species in which we observed the behaviour of Dolichoderus thoracicus ants when encountering flowers. In eight out of 18 plant species studied, ants showed a significantly higher rejection rate when they encountered flowers than when they encountered controls. Our results are thus consistent with the hypothesis that ants may negatively affect plant fitness by reduced intensity of pollinator visits and that ants are repelled from flowers of many tropical plant species, although this repellence is clearly not ubiquitous.

Keywords

Ant repellence Forest canopy Lowland dipterocarp forest Nectar Pollination 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Friedrich Drayer Company (Glottertal, Germany) for generously donating tree-climbing equipment, the Economic Planning Unit (Malaysia) and the Danum Valley Management Committee for permission. This work was part of the Royal Society’s South East Asia Rainforest Research Programme. The DAAD is acknowledged for travel support for R.J. and the Danum Valley staff for logistical support.

References

  1. Altshuler DL (1999) Novel interactions of non-pollinating ants with pollinators and fruit consumers in a tropical forest. Oecologia 119:600–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beattie AJ, Turnbull CL, Hough T, Jobson S, Knox B (1985) The vulnerability of pollen and fungal spores to ant secretions: evidence and some evolutionary implications. Am J Bot 72:606–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57:289–300Google Scholar
  4. Blüthgen N, Gebauer G, Fiedler K (2003) Disentangling a rainforest food web using stable isotopes: dietary diversity in a species-rich ant community. Oecologia 137:426–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blüthgen N, Gottsberger G, Fiedler K (2004a) Sugar and amino acid composition of ant-attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest. Aust Ecol 29:418–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blüthgen N, Stork NE, Fiedler K (2004b) Bottom-up control and co-occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos 106:344–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson DW (1997) The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biol J Linn Soc 61:153–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidson DW, Cook SC, Snelling RR, Chua TH (2003) Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300:969–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feinsinger P, Swarm LA (1978) How common are ant-repellent nectars? Biotropica 10:238–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fowler HG, Whitford WG (1982) Floral visitation by Chihuahuan Desert ants. J Nat Hist 6:879–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galen C (1983) The effects of nectar thieving ants on seedset in floral scent morphs of Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 41:245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galen C (2003) Ants in your plants: effects of nectar-thieves on pollen fertility and seed-siring capacity in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 101:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghazoul J (2001) Can floral repellents pre-empt potential ant–plant conflicts? Ecol Lett 4:295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goitía W, Bosque C, Jaffé K (1992) Interacción hormiga-polinizador en cacao. Turrialba 42:178–186Google Scholar
  15. Guerrant EO, Fiedler PL (1981) Flower defenses against nectar-pilferage by ants. Biotropica 13:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haber WA, Frankie GW, Baker HG, Baker I, Koptur S (1981) Ants like flower nectar. Biotropica 13:211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harley R (1991) The greasy pole syndrome. In: Huxley CR, Cutler DF (eds) Ant–plant interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 430–433Google Scholar
  18. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaffé K, Hernandez JV, Goitía W, Osio A, Osborn F, Cerda H, Arab A, Rincones J, Gajardo R, Caraballo L, Andara C, Lopez H (2003) Flower ecology in the neotropics: a flower–ant love–hate relationship. In: Basset Y, Novotny V, Miller S, Kitching R (eds) Arthropods of tropical forests: spatio-temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 213–219Google Scholar
  20. Janzen DH (1977) Why don’t ants visit flowers? Biotropica 9:252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koptur S, Truong N (1998) Facultative ant–plant interactions: nectar sugar preferences of introduced pest ant species in South Florida. Biotropica 30:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanza J (1988) Ant preferences for Passiflora nectar mimics that contain amino acids. Biotropica 20:341–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van der Pijl L (1955) Some remarks on myrmecophytes. Phytomorphology 5:190–200Google Scholar
  24. Stäger R (1931) Über die Einwirkung von Duftstoffen und Pflanzendüften auf Ameisen. Z Wissensch Insektenbiol 26:55–65Google Scholar
  25. Sugiura N, Miyazaki S, Nagaishi S (2006) A supplementary contribution of ants in the pollination of an orchid, Epipactis thunbergii, usually pollinated by hover flies. Plant Syst Evol 258:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tobin JE (1994) Ants as primary consumers: diet and abundance in the Formicidae. In: Hunt JH, Nalepa CA (eds) Nourishment and evolution in insect societies. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 279–307Google Scholar
  27. Tsuji K, Hasyim A, Nakamura H, Nakamura K (2004) Asian weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina, and their repelling of pollinators. Ecol Res 19:669–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Willmer PG, Stone GN (1997) How aggressive ant guards assist seed-set in Acacia flowers. Nature 388:165–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Junker
    • 1
  • Arthur Y. C. Chung
    • 2
  • Nico Blüthgen
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical BiologyUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  2. 2.Forestry DepartmentForest Research CentreSandakanMalaysia

Personalised recommendations