Ecological Research

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 220–227 | Cite as

Estimating nest locations of bumblebee Bombus ardens from flower quality and distribution

  • Yukari SuzukiEmail author
  • Lina G. Kawaguchi
  • Yukihiko Toquenaga
Original Article


The central-place forager in a social-insect colony, e.g., the bumblebee, has been expected to maximize its net rate of energy gain to increase the success of its colony. In addition to foraging behavior, the nest location is an important factor for the success of the colony. The bumblebee’s nest location would be affected by the spatial distribution of flowers and their food quality. In this study, we constructed a model to estimate bumblebee nest sites, using the net energy intake rate at available food sites for workers foraging from the nest site. We hypothesized that the probability of colony establishment at a site in coordinates (x, y) was high as the sum of the net energy intake rate I(x, y) increased. To obtain I(x, y), nectar standing crop, sugar concentration, and foraging time were measured for ten plant species in the study site covering 6.25 km2. As available flowers changed seasonally, I(x, y) was calculated for three periods: the end of April, the beginning of May, and the middle of May. To verify our hypothesis, we compared the estimations in our model with the actual nest sites of Bombus ardens found in the beginning of May and June by means of tracking bumblebees. From the results, we considered that the net energy intake rate at mid-May might represent the probability of colony establishment, because it could affect colony persistence and reproductive success.


Central-place foraging Net energy intake rate Colony persistence Reproductive success Nest site 



We thank Kazunori Ohno for giving information about geographic profiling. We also thank Kazuharu Ohashi and Koich Fujii for helpful discussion. Dulee Munidasa, Yaya Hoshino, and Nozomu Kokuvo helped us to search for bumblebee’s nests. Finally, we thank reviewers for improvement of our manuscript.


  1. Allen T, Cameron S, McGinley R, Heinrich B (1978) The role of workers and new queens in the ergonomics of a bumblebee colony (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 51:329–342Google Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1978) Optimal foraging area: size and allocation of search effort. Theor Popul Biol 13:397–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey KH, Polis GA (1987) Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. Oecologia 72:440–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers MA (1985) Bumble bee colonization, extinction, and reproduction in subalpine meadows in Northeastern Utah. Ecology 66:914–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman RE, Wang J, Bourke FG (2003) Genetic analysis of spatial foraging patterns and resource sharing in bumble bee pollinators. Mol Ecol 12:2801–2808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comba L, Corbet SA, Barron A, Bird A, Collinge S, Miyazaki N, Powell M (1999) Garden flowers: insect visits and the floral reward of horticulturally-modified variants. Ann Bot 83:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cresswell JE, Osborne JL, Goulson D (2000) An economic model of the limits to foraging range in central place foragers with numerical solutions for bumblebees. Ecol Entomol 25:249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donovan BJ, Wier SS (1978) Development of hives for field population increase, and studies on the life cycles of the four species of introduced bumble bees in New Zealand. NZ J Agric Res 21:733–756Google Scholar
  9. Dramstad WE (1996) Do bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) really forage close to their nests? J Insect Behav 9:163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dukas R, Edelstein-Keshet L (1998) The spatial distribution of colonial food provisioners. J Theor Biol 190:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellington CP, Machin KE, Casey TM (1990) Oxygen consumption of bumblebees in forward flight. Nature 347:472–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fussell M, Corbet SA (1992) The nesting places of some British bumble bees. J Apic Res 31:32–41Google Scholar
  13. Geographic Survey Institute of Japan (1995) Digital map 25000 (Map image). CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  14. Goulson D (2003) Bumblebees: their behaviour and ecology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinrich B (1975) Thermoregulation in bumblebees II. Energetics of warm-up and free flight. J Comp Physiol 96:155–166Google Scholar
  16. Heinrich B (1979) Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Mechanisms of dispersed central-place foraging in polydomous colonies of the Argentine ant. Anim Behav 59:433–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kells AR, Goulson D (2003) Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK. Biol Conserv 109:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Le Comber SC, Nicholls B, Rossmo DK, Racey PA (2006) Geographic profiling and animal foraging. J Theor Biol 240:233–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mačukanović M, Blaženčić Ž (1998) Diurnal and seasonal dynamics of nectar secretion of some species in the family Lamiaceae. Acta Vet (Beogr) 2–3:173–184Google Scholar
  21. Nakamura H, Toquenaga Y (2002) Estimating colony locations of bumble bees with moving average model. Ecol Res 17:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orians GH, Pearson NE (1979) On the theory of central place foraging. In: Horn D, Stairs G, Mitchell R (eds) Analysis of ecological systems. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, pp 154–177Google Scholar
  23. Osborne JL, Clark SJ, Morris RJ, Williams IH, Riley JR, Smith AD, Reynolds DR, Edwards AS (1999) A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. J Appl Ecol 36:519–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  25. Pelletier L, McNeil JN (2003) The effect of food supplementation on reproductive success in bumblebee field colonies. Oikos 103:688–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pomeroy N (1981) Use of natural sites and field hives by a long-tongued bumble bee Bombus ruderatus. NZ J Agric Res 24:409–414Google Scholar
  27. Rossmo DK (2000) Geographic profiling. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. Saville NM, Dramstad WE, Fry GLA, Corbet SA (1997) Bumblebee movement in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 61:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schoener TW (1979) Generality of the size–distance relation in models of optimal feeding. Am Nat 114:902–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stiles EW (1979) Foraging behavior of bumblebees on false foxglove. NY Entomol Soc 85:249–252Google Scholar
  31. Svensson B, Lagerlöf J, Svensson BG (2000) Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 77:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walther-Hellwig K, Frankl R (2000) Foraging distances of Bombus muscorum, Bombus lapidarius, and Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera, Apidae). J Insect Behav 13:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yukari Suzuki
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Lina G. Kawaguchi
    • 1
  • Yukihiko Toquenaga
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Integrative Environmental Sciences, Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Ten-Nou-DaiTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of Kyushu, 6-10-1 HakozakiHigashi-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations