Ecological Research

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 632–645 | Cite as

Species richness and composition of Curculionidae (Coleoptera) in a conifer plantation, secondary forest, and old-growth forest in the central mountainous region of Japan

Original Article


Weevil (Curculionidae, Coleoptera) species richness and composition were investigated and compared among larch [Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carriére] plantations, secondary forests, and old-growth forests in the central mountainous region of Japan. In addition, to assess the effects of forest-management practices, namely thinning and long-rotation logging schedules (long rotation), the weevil assemblages of recently thinned middle-aged and long-rotated larch plantations were compared with those of middle-aged larch plantations. Malaise traps were set in 44 stands of these forest types, and weevils were separated and identified. Several environmental factors other than forest type were also examined. Weevil species richness and diversity indices [Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H′) and Simpson’s index of diversity (D)] were higher in the secondary forest than in the larch plantation. Because of its wide distribution and higher weevil species richness, the secondary forest contributed to maintaining weevil diversity in this region. Old-growth forest had higher diversity indices (H′ and D) than did the larch plantation. The secondary forest had the highest number of species in total. Though the number of individuals was the highest in larch plantation, species richness, H′ and D of the plantation were generally low. Weevil community structure and species composition differed among the three forest types, but the difference in weevil composition between the larch plantation and the other two forest types was the largest. Forest type is probably the most important factor for determining the differences in weevil assemblage, and further, both dominant tree type (coniferous trees versus broad-leaved trees) and the number of mature tree species seem to be important factors for weevil species composition. Among forest management practices, long rotation caused diversity indices (H′ and D) to increase while thinning appeared to cause only minor changes in the weevil assemblages. Because species richness and species composition of Curculionidae well reflected the differences in forest types and some other environmental factors investigated, this family seems suitable for diversity research in forests. Further research on biodiversity with the use of this family should, therefore, be expected.


Biodiversity Larix kaempferi Weevils Thinning Long rotation 



I thank Mr. Teruo Nohira, Gifu Prefectural Forest Science Research Institute, for identifying many weevils and for helpful advice. I am also grateful to Mr. Masao Osawa for correcting the English of the manuscript and helpful advice. I deeply appreciate technical assistance given me by Mrs. Miki Saso and Miss Kumi Kanemaru, and the helpful advice and encouragement by members of Yamanashi Forest Research Institute. I also thank anonymous referees for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by Forest Ecosystem Monitoring Project of Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan.


  1. Beccaloni GW, Gaston KJ (1995) Predicting the species richness of neotropical forest butterflies: Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as indicators. Biol Conserv 71:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol Conserv 80:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  4. Fridman J, Walheim M (2000) Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. For Ecol Manage 131:23–36Google Scholar
  5. Ghazoul J (2002) Impact of logging on the richness and diversity of forest butterflies in a tropical dry forest in Thailand. Biodivers Conserv 11:521–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greatorex-Davies JN, Sparks TH (1994) The response of Heteroptera and Coleoptera species to shade and aspect in rides of coniferised lowland woods in Southern England. Biol Conserv 67:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Green P, Peterken GF (1997) Variation in the amount of dead wood in the woodlands of the Lower Wye Valley, UK in relation to the intensity of management. For Ecol Manage 98:229–238Google Scholar
  8. Grove SJ (2002) The influence of forest management history on the integrity of the saproxylic beetle fauna in an Australian lowland tropical rainforest. Biol Conserv 104:149–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayashi M, Morimoto K, Kimoto S (1989) The Coleoptera of Japan in color, vol IV, 2nd edn. Hoikusha, Osaka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  10. Hill MO (1979) TWINSPAN—a fortran program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirby KJ, Reid CM, Thomas RC, Goldsmith FB (1998) Preliminary estimates of fallen dead wood and standing dead trees in managed and unmanaged forests in Britain. J Appl Ecol 35:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koivula M, Kukkonen J, Niemelä J (2002) Boreal carabid-beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages along the clear-cut originated succession gradient. Biodivers Conserv 11:1269–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawrence JM, Samways MJ (2002) Influence of hilltop vegetation type on an African butterfly assemblage and its conservation. Biodivers Conserv 11:1163–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B, Bloemers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M, Holt RD, Larsen TB, Mawdsley NA, Stork NE, Srivastava DS, Watt AD (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391:72–76Google Scholar
  16. Maeto K, Makihara H (1999) Changes in insect assemblages with secondary succession of temperate deciduous forests after clear-cutting. Jpn J Entomol 2:11–26Google Scholar
  17. Maeto K, Sato S, Miyata H (2002) Species diversity of longicorn beetles in humid warm-temperate forests: the impact of forest management practices on old-growth forest species in southwestern Japan. Biodivers Conserv 11:1919–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Magura T (2002) Carabids and forest edge: spatial pattern and edge effect. For Ecol Manage 157:23–37Google Scholar
  19. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Punttila P, Kaila L, Rauh J (2000) Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biol Conserv 94:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, ORGoogle Scholar
  22. Miyawaki A, Suzuki K, Fujiwara K, Harada H, Sasaki Y (1977) Vegetation of Yamanashi Prefecture. Yamanashi Prefecture, Yamanashi, JapanGoogle Scholar
  23. Niemelä J, Langor D, Spence JR (1993) Effects of forest management practices on the diversity of ground-occurring beetles in mixed northern hardwood forests of the Great Lakes Region. For Ecol Manage 139:135–155Google Scholar
  24. Ohsawa M (2004) Species richness of Cerambycidae in larch plantations and natural broad-leaved forests of the central mountainous region of Japan. For Ecol Manage 189:375–385Google Scholar
  25. Spence JR, Langor DW, Niemelä J, Cárcamo HA, Currie CR (1996) Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species. Ann Zool Fennici 33:173–184Google Scholar
  26. Vessby K, Söderström B, Glimskär A, Svensson B (2002) Species-richness correlations of six different taxa in Swedish seminatural grasslands. Conserv Biol 16:430–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Werner SM, Raffa KF (2000) Effects of forest management practices on the diversity of ground-occurring beetles in mixed northern hardwood forests of the Great Lakes Region. For Ecol Manage 139:135–155Google Scholar
  28. Wheeler QD (1990) Insect diversity and cladistic constraints. Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:1031–1047Google Scholar
  29. Wood BC, Pullin AS (2002) Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 11:1451–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamanashi Prefecture (2000) Forest ecosystem monitoring project of Yamanashi prefecture (interim report). Yamanashi Prefecture, Yamanashi, JapanGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yamanashi Forest Research InstituteMasuho-cho, Minamikoma-gun,Japan

Personalised recommendations