Ecological Research

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 563–572 | Cite as

Responses of plant functional types to an environmental gradient on the Northeast China Transect

Original Article

Abstract

The hypothesis that some plant traits such as life form are robust surrogates for plant functional type (PFT) has provoked an ongoing debate. Based on a dataset from the Northeast China Transect (NECT), we attempted to test the hypothesis by comparing an objective PFT identification framework in which large datasets of plant traits were considered with two subjective PFT frameworks in which only a few plant traits were involved. Additionally, we addressed the relations between the relative abundance of PFTs and the environmental gradient represented by actual evapotranspiration (AET) along the NECT. We also discuss the changes in ecosystem functioning associated with the PFT turnover along the environmental gradient. Based on an objective PFT classification, eight PFTs were identified: deciduous trees, shrubs, perennial forbs with lower net photosynthesis, perennial forbs with higher net photosynthesis, perennial bulb-grasses, perennial tiller-grasses, annual C4 herbs and evergreen trees. Our results indicated that some plant traits, such as life form and photosynthesis pathway, are robust surrogates for PFTs, implying that subjective approaches to PFT classification are useful. Nonetheless, caution should be used during the classification of PFTs. The framework adopted for PFT classification should depend on the specific scientific issues being dealt with. It is therefore meaningless to pursue a general framework for the identification of PFTs even within given plant communities. On the other hand, our quantitative classification of PFTs confirmed recurrent patterns with respect to PFT turnover along an environmental gradient. Furthermore, with the turnover in PFT along the NECT from the west to the east, ecosystem properties such as productivity and carbon storage are predicted to decrease, while photosynthesis is predicted to increase, suggesting that PFT turnover would inevitably lead to changes in ecosystem functioning.

Key words

Life form Plant traits Actual evapotranspiration (AET) Productivity Carbon storage Photosynthesis pathway 

References

  1. Aguiar MR, Paruelo JM, Sala OE, Lauenroth WK (1996) Ecosystem responses to changes in plant functional type composition: an example from the Patagonian steppes. J Veg Sci 7:381–390Google Scholar
  2. Anon. (1980) Vegetation of China. In: Editorial Committee for Vegetation of China (eds) Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2001) Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends Ecol Evol 16:45–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boutin C, Keddy PA (1993) A functional classification of wetland plants. J Veg Sci 4:591–600Google Scholar
  5. Canadell JG, Steffen WL, White PS (2002) IGBP/GCTE terrestrial transects: dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems under environmental change—introduction. J Veg Sci 13:298–300Google Scholar
  6. Chapin FS III, Bret-Harte MS, Hobbie SE, Zhong H (1996) Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change. J Veg Sci 7:347–358Google Scholar
  7. Craine JM, Froehle J, Tilman DG, Wedin DA, Chapin FS III (2001) The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93:274–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diaz S, Cabido M (1997) Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change. J Veg Sci 8:463–473Google Scholar
  9. Diaz Barradas MC, Zunzunegui M, Tirado R, Ain-Lhout F, Garcia Novo F (1999) Plant functional types and ecosystem function in Mediterranean shrubland. J Veg Sci 10:709–716Google Scholar
  10. Duckworth JC, Kent M, Ramsay PM (2000) Plant functional types: an alternative to taxonomic plant community description in biogeography? Prog Phys Geogr 24:515–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein HE, Gill RA, Paruelo JM, Lauenroth WK, Jia GJ, Burke IC (2002) The relative abundance of three plant functional types in temperate grasslands and shrublands of North and South America: effects of projected climate change. J Biogeogr 29:875–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedel MH, Bastin GN, Griffin GF (1988) Range assessment and monitoring in arid lands: the derivation of functional groups to simplify data. J Env Manage 27:85–97Google Scholar
  13. Fu LK, Chen TQ, Lang KY, Hong T (2001) Higher plants of China. Qingdao Publishing House, QingdaoGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao Q, Zhang XS (1997) A simulation study of responses of the Northeast China Transect to elevated CO2 and climate change. Ecol Appl 7:470–483Google Scholar
  15. Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  16. Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (1988) Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Haxeltine A, Prentice IC (1996) BIOME3: an equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochem Cycle 10:693–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huntley B (1991) How plants respond to climate change: migration rates, individualism and the consequences for plant communities. Ann Bot 67:15–22Google Scholar
  19. Hutchinson MF (1989) A new objective method for spatial interpolation of meteorological variables from irregular networks applied to the estimation of monthly mean solar radiation, temperature, precipitation and windrun. Need for climatic and hydrologic data in agriculture in Southeast Asia. CSIRO, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang GM, Dong M (2000) A comparative studies on photosynthesis and water use efficiency between clonal and non-clonal plant species along the Northeast China Transect (NECT). Acta Bot Sin 42:855–863Google Scholar
  21. Jiang GM, Tang HP, Yu M (1999) Response of photosynthesis of different plant functional types to environmental changes along Northeast China Transect. Trees 14:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleyer M (2002) Validation of plant functional types across two contrasting landscapes. J Veg Sci 13:167–178Google Scholar
  23. Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16:545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA (1997) Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol Evol 12:474–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leishman MR, Westoby M (1992) Classifying plants into groups on the basis of associations of individual traits—evidence from Australian semi-arid woodlands. J Ecol 80:417–424Google Scholar
  26. Leishman MR, Westoby M (1994) The role of large seed size in shaded conditions—experimental evidence. Funct Ecol 8: 205–214Google Scholar
  27. Loreau M (2001) Biodiverisity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mabry C, Ackerly D, Gerhardt F (2000) Landscape and species-level distribution of morphological and life history traits in a temperate woodland flora. J Veg Sci 11:213–224Google Scholar
  29. McGillivray CW, Grime JP (1995) Genome size predicts frost resistance in British herbaceous plants: implication for rates of vegetation response to global warming. Funct Ecol 9:320–325Google Scholar
  30. McIntyre S, Lavorel S (2001) Livestock grazing in subtropical pastures: steps in the analysis of attribute response and plant functional types. J Ecol 89:209–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McIntyre S, Lavorel S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA (1999) Disturbance response in vegetation—towards a global perspective on functional traits. J Veg Sci 10:621–630Google Scholar
  32. Monteith JL (1995) Accommodation between transpiring vegetation and the convective boundary layer. J Hydrol 166:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Naeem S (1998) Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conserv Biol 12:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naeem S, Thompson LJ, Lawler SP (1994) Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368:734–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ni J (2003) Plant functional types and climate along a precipitation gradient in temperate grasslands, north-east China and south-east Mongolia. J Arid Env 53:501–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ni J, Wang GH (2004) The Northeast China Transect (NECT): ten-year synthesis and future challenges. Acta Bot Sin 46:379–391Google Scholar
  37. Ni J, Zhang XS (2000) Climate variability, ecological gradient and the Northeast China Transect (NECT). J Arid Env 46:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ni J, Li YY, Zhang XS (1999) The scientific significance of the Northeast China Transect (NECT) to global change study by its eco-geographical characteristics. Acta Ecol Sin 19:622–629Google Scholar
  39. Ni J et al. (2000) Modeling the vegetation of China using the process-based equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model BIOME3. Global Ecol Biogeogr 9:463–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Niinemets Ü (2001) Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology 82:453–469Google Scholar
  41. Noble IR, Gitay H (1996) A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. J Veg Sci 7:329–336Google Scholar
  42. Pavón N, Hernández-Trejo H, Rico-Gray V (2000) Distribution of plant life forms along an altitude gradient in the semi-arid valley of Zapoltitlán, Mexico. J Veg Sci 11:39–42Google Scholar
  43. Reich PB, Tjoelker MG, Walters MB, Vanderklein DW, Buschena C (1998) Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light. Funct Ecol 12:337–338Google Scholar
  44. Shipley B, Keddy PA, Moore DRJ, Lemkt K (1989) Regeneration and establishment strategies of emergent macrophytes. J Ecol 77:1093–1110Google Scholar
  45. Skarpe C (1996) Plant functional types and climate in a southern African savanna. J Veg Sci 7:397–404Google Scholar
  46. Tang HP (1999) Distribution of C4 plants along the Northeast China transect and its correlation to the environmental factors. Chin Sci Bull 44:1316–1320Google Scholar
  47. ter Braak CJF (1990) CANOCO–A FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (update notes version 3.1). TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson K, Hillier SH, Grime JP, Bossard CC, Band SR (1996) A functional analysis of a limestone grassland community. J Veg Sci 7:371–380Google Scholar
  49. Van Cleve K, Oliver L, Schlentner R, Viereck LA, Dyrness CT (1983) Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems. Can J For Res 13:747–766Google Scholar
  50. Vitousek PM (1994) Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75:1861–1876Google Scholar
  51. Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, Roderick M, Garnier E, Eriksson O (1999) Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci 10:609–620Google Scholar
  52. Xiong Y, Li QK (1987) Soil of China, 2nd edn. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang XS, Gao Q, Yang DA, Zhou GS, Ni J, Wang Q (1997) A gradient analysis and prediction on the North-East China Transect (NECT) for global change study. Acta Bot Sin 39:785–799Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Quantitative Vegetation Ecology, Institute of BotanyThe Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingThe People’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute for BiogeochemistryJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations