Ecological Research

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 547–553 | Cite as

Parental care behavior in the monogamous, sexually dimorphic Madagascar paradise flycatcher: sex differences and the effect of brood size

Original Article


I studied the parental care behavior of the Madagascar paradise flycatcher Terpsiphone mutata in northwestern Madagascar. I especially focused on feeding, brooding and vigilance behaviors. Feeding rate did not differ between males and females, but females spent more time at the nest than males. Females dedicated their time to brooding, while males perched on the nest and were vigilant. Both parents changed the feeding rate in relation to brood size, so the feeding rate per nestling was not different among nests of different brood size. Duration of brooding by females increased with decreasing brood size, suggesting that the Royama effect, the pattern of lower feeding rate per nestling in larger broods, did not apply in this study. Males spent more time on vigilance than females. Anti-predator vigilance by males should be important for nestling survival given the high predation pressure typical of this population. In conclusion, males provide considerable parental care probably to minimize nestling starvation and to avoid nest predation. My results are not consistent with the general pattern of less parental effort by males in monogamous, sexually dimorphic species.

Key words

Madagascar Monogamy Parental care Sexual dimorphism Terpsiphone mutata 


  1. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Best LB (1977) Nestling biology of the Field Sparrow. Auk 94:308–319Google Scholar
  3. Björklund M (1990) A phylogenetic interaction of sexual dimorphism in body size and ornament in relation to mating system in birds. J Evol Biol 3:171–183Google Scholar
  4. Breitwisch R, Merritt PG, Whitesides GH (1986) Parental investment by the Northern Mockingbird: male and female roles in feeding nestlings. Auk 103:152–159Google Scholar
  5. Carere C, Alleva E (1998) Sex differences in parental care in the common swift (Apus apus): effect of brood size and nestling age. Can J Zool 76:1382–1387Google Scholar
  6. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  7. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Pitcher TE (2001) Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55:161–175Google Scholar
  9. Filliater TS, Breitwitch R (1997) Nestling provisioning by the extremely dichromatic Northern Cardinal. Wilson Bull 109:145–153Google Scholar
  10. Goodman SM, Parrillo P (1997) A study of the diets of malagasy birds based on stomach contents. Ostrich 68:104–113Google Scholar
  11. Hails CJ (1979) A comparison of flight energetics in Hirundinidae and other birds. Comp Biochem Physiol A 63:581–585Google Scholar
  12. Hino T (1998) Mutualistic and commensal organization of avian mixed-species foraging flocks in a forest of western Madagascar. J Avian Biol 29:17–24Google Scholar
  13. Johnson EJ, Best LB (1982) Factors affecting feeding and brooding of Gray Catbird nestlings. Auk 99:148–156Google Scholar
  14. Kirkpatrick M, Price T, Arnold SJ (1990) The Darwin–Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evolution 44:180–193Google Scholar
  15. Knapton RW (1984) Parental feeding of nestling Nashville Warblers: the effects of food type, brood size, nestling age, and time of day. Wilson Bull 96:594–602Google Scholar
  16. Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Langrand O (1990) Guide to the birds of Madagascar. Yale University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Lazarus J, Inglis IR (1986) Shared and unshared parental investment, parent–offspring conflict and brood size. Anim Behav 34:1791–1804Google Scholar
  19. Leffelaar D, Robertson RJ (1986) Equality of feeding roles and the maintenance of monogamy in tree swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:199–206Google Scholar
  20. Ligon JD (1999) The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Mizuta T (1998) The breeding biology of the black paradise flycatcher Terpsiphone atrocaudata. Jpn J Ornithol 47:25–28Google Scholar
  22. Mizuta T (2000) Intrusion into neighboring home range by male Madagascar paradise flycatchers Terpsiphone mutata: a circumstantial evidence for extra-pair copulation. J Ethol 18:123–126Google Scholar
  23. Mizuta T (2002a) Seasonal changes in egg mass and timing of laying in the Madagascar paradise flycatcher, Terpsiphone mutata. Ostrich 73:5–10Google Scholar
  24. Mizuta T (2002b) Breeding biology of the Madagascar paradise flycatcher Terpsiphone mutata, with special reference to plumage variation in males. Ostrich 73:67–69Google Scholar
  25. Mizuta T (2002c) Predation by Eulemur fulvus fulvus on a nestling of Terpsiphone mutata (Aves: Monarchidae) in dry forest in northwestern Madagascar. Folia Primatol 73:217–219Google Scholar
  26. Mizuta T, Yamagishi S (1998) Breeding biology of monogamous Asian paradise flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisi (Aves: Monarchinae): a special reference to color dimorphism and exaggerated long tails in male. Raffles Bull Zool 46:101–112Google Scholar
  27. Møller AP (1986) Mating systems among European passerines: a review. Ibis 128:234–250Google Scholar
  28. Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1993) Certainty of paternity covaries with parental care in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:261–268Google Scholar
  29. Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1994) The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity. Evolution 48:1089–1100Google Scholar
  30. Møller AP, Thornhill R (1998) Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection. Anim Behav 55:1507–1515Google Scholar
  31. Moreau RE (1947) Relations between number in brood, feeding-rate and nestling period in nine species of birds in Tanganyka Territory. J Anim Ecol 16:205–209Google Scholar
  32. Mulder RA, Ramiarison R (2003) Terpsiphone mutata, Madagascar paradise flycatcher, Remaly, Tsingetra, Rengetra, Singetraka, Dady, Angetry. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP (eds) The natural history of Madagascar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1134–1146Google Scholar
  33. Nur N (1984) Feeding frequencies of nestling blue tits (Parus caeruleus): costs, benefits and a model of optimal feeding frequency. Oecologia 65:125–137Google Scholar
  34. Owens IPF, Hartley IR (1998) Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc R Soc London B 265:397–407Google Scholar
  35. Rosa SM, Murphy MT (1994) Trade-offs and constraints on Eastern Kingbird parental care. Wilson Bull 106:668–678Google Scholar
  36. Royama T (1966) Factors governing feeding rate, food requirement and brood size of Great Tits Parus major. Ibis 108:313–347Google Scholar
  37. Rytkönen S, Koivula K, Orell M (1996) Patterns of per-brood and per-offspring provisioning efforts in the Willow Tit Parus montanus. J Avian Biol 27:21–30Google Scholar
  38. Schadd CA, Ritchison G (1998) Provisioning of nestlings by male and female Yellow-breasted Chats. Wilson Bull 110:398–402Google Scholar
  39. Sinclair I, Langrand O (1998) Birds of the Indian Ocean islands. Struik, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  40. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. W.H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Trémont S, Ford HA (2000) Partitioning of parental care in the Leaden Flycatcher. Emu 100:1–11Google Scholar
  42. Verner J, Willson MF (1969) Mating systems, sexual dimorphism, and the role of male North American passerine birds in the nesting cycle. Ornithol Monogr 9:1–76Google Scholar
  43. Westneat DF (1988) Male parental care and extrapair copulations in the Indigo Bunting. Auk 105:149–160Google Scholar
  44. Williams JB (1988) Field metabolism of tree swallows during the breeding season. Auk 105:706–714Google Scholar
  45. Winkler DW (1987) A general model for parental care. Am Nat 130:526–543Google Scholar
  46. Woodard JD, Murphy MT (1999) Sex roles, parental experience and reproductive success of eastern kingbirds, Tyrannus tyrannus. Anim Behav 57:105–115Google Scholar
  47. Yasukawa K, McClure JL, Boley RA, Zanocco J (1990) Provisioning of nestlings by male and female red-winged blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Anim Behav 40:153–166Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ecological Society of Japan 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Ethology, Department of Zoology, Graduate School of ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory of Geographical Ecology, Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceToho UniversityFunabashi, ChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations