Developing pediatric three-dimensional upper airway normative values using fixed and interactive thresholds
- 28 Downloads
To develop and compare pediatric upper airway three-dimensional normative values using the two most commonly used cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) software: Invivo5 (fixed threshold) and Dolphin 3D (interactive threshold).
Out of 3738 CBCT scans, scans of 81 pediatric patients were utilized after applying strict exclusion criteria. The sample was grouped into two age groups (7–11 and 12–17 years). Intra-class correlation coefficient was used to test intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and showed coefficients greater than 0.9 indicating good reliability of the methods used.
Paired t tests showed that volumetric and area measurements obtained using Dolphin 3D were significantly larger than those obtained using Invivo5 (p < 0.05). The mean minimal cross-sectional areas (MCSA) for Dolphin 3D were 151 mm2 and 177 mm2 for age groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean MCSA values for Invivo5 for age groups 1 and 2 were 120 mm2 and 145 mm2, respectively.
Pediatric upper airway volumetric, area, and linear measurements were reported after applying strict exclusion criteria including a validated sleep questionnaire. Our goal is that clinicians utilize the proposed-here normative values for screening and assist in the timely diagnosis and management of pediatric sleep apnea.
KeywordsAirway CBCT OSA Sleep apnea Adenoids
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.
- 2.Pliska B, Lowe AA, Almeida FR. The orthodontist and the obstructive sleep apnea patient. Int J Orthod. 2012;23(3):19–22.Google Scholar
- 5.El H, Palomo JM. Measuring the airway in 3 dimensions: a reliability and accuracy study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;137(4 Suppl):S50 e1–9 (discussion S-2).Google Scholar
- 10.Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic cephalometry. London: Mosby-Wolfe; 1995.Google Scholar
- 14.Kim YJ, Hong JS, Hwang YI, Park YH. Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway in preadolescent children with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;137(3):306 e1–11 (discussion 7).Google Scholar
- 17.Shprintzen RJ. The origin of speech ease: evolution of the human upper airway and its functional implications for obstructive sleep apnea. Editorial commentary: the great leap forward: the anatomic basis for the acquisition of speech and obstructive sleep apnea by Terence M. Davidson. Sleep Med. 2003;4(3):171–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Avrahami E, Englender M. Relation between CT axial cross-sectional area of the oropharynx and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in adults. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16(1):135–40.Google Scholar