A methodological approach to standardize and control the quality of the position and alignment of lamina implants on two-dimensional radiographs
- 7 Downloads
We sought to validate a new method to detect the degree of correlation between simulated and real tilted blade implants as they appear on a single two-dimensional radiograph.
The angular correction factor (CF^) was defined as the coupling of two subsequent angle transformations, a set of five angular values describing the theoretical radiographic appearance of the blade implant: (1) three consecutive rotations about the axes of the blade (\(\varphi\), θ, and ψ, standing for pitch, roll, and yaw, respectively) to represent the polarization directions; (2) a two-dimensional projection defined by two angles (λ and \(\phi\), respectively, longitude and latitude) to represent the vector of the X-ray beam intersecting the detector plate. Data of patients who received fixed prostheses supported by blade-form implants were employed to calculate a dimensional correction factor (CF°), a specific length through the major axis. The simulation of a distorted radiograph of a blade positioned in space was compared with the real radiograph. Differences in the angular measurements served as an initial test to assess the effectiveness of the method.
In the acquired sets of periapical radiographs, mean misalignments of + 3.58° in longitude and − 0.04° in latitude were registered. The following variations were detected during the accuracy testing: the absolute error was 0.1 ± 7.5° for angle \(\varphi\); 2.4 ± 6.7° for angle θ; − 1.0 ± 3.7° for angle ψ; 4.5 ± 8.6° for angle λ; and 2.0 ± 9.3° for angle \(\phi\). The linear dependence between CF° and CF^ was estimated by a robust linear regression: slope + 0.991, intercept + 0.007, and adjusted R2 0.992.
This a posteriori analysis introduces the explicit trigonometric equations of the theoretical standard (CF^) used to describe the blade implant radiographic position and misalignment on two-dimensional radiographs.
KeywordsTissue–implant interactions Dental digital radiography Algorithms Radiographic image interpretation Blade-form implant
The present study was supported in part by the Tuscan Stomatologic Institute.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Giovanni Battista Menchini-Fabris, Ugo Covani, Paolo Toti, Simone Marconcini, Antonio Barone, and Ranieri Martuscelli declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights statement
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:11–25.Google Scholar
- 11.Barone A, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris GB, Derchi G, Marconcini S, Covani U. Extra oral digital scanning and imaging superimposition for volume analysis of bone remodeling after tooth extraction with and without 2 types of particulate porcine mineral insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:750–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar