Reproducibility of CBCT image analysis: a clinical study on intrapersonal and interpersonal errors in bone structure determination
- 65 Downloads
For correct implant planning based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the bone contour must be accurately determined. Identification of the contour is difficult in bones with incomplete mineralization. In this clinical study, we investigated the intrapersonal and interpersonal reproducibilities of manual bone contour determination on CBCT images using a semi-automated computerized process.
The bone surface level in the area of the socket in 20 patients who had undergone tooth extraction from the upper jaw at 10 ± 1 weeks previously was determined on CBCT images. Two investigators with different levels of experience determined the bone structure initially (T0) and repeated the procedure after 3 months (T1). The bone structure marked on CBCT images was converted into a surface data set. The resulting data sets were superimposed on one another. In the analyses, the shortest distances between the datasets were identified and measured. The average deviations were statistically evaluated.
The intrapersonal evaluation resulted in an average deviation of 0.18 mm across both investigators. The interpersonal analysis comparing the two investigators resulted in average deviations of 0.15 mm at T0 and 0.26 mm at T1. Significant differences were not found.
The low intrapersonal deviation indicates that the procedure has satisfactory reproducibility. All deviations were within the range of the selected resolution of the CBCT device. Application of a semi-automated procedure to detect the bone border in areas with incomplete mineralization is a predictable process.
The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the WHO: DRKS00004769, date of registration: 28 February 2013; and DRKS00005978, date of registration: 09 November 2015.
KeywordsCBCT Observer error Bone surface determination Accuracy Guided implantology
The study was funded by Resorba Medical GmbH (Nürnberg, Germany) and the Oral Reconstruction Foundation (Basel, Switzerland) (Grant No. CF 41305).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Sigmar Schnutenhaus, Michael Graf, Isabel Doering, Ralph G. Luthardt, and Heike Rudolph declare no conflicts of interest.
The Ethical Committee of the Medical Faculty of Ulm University approved the current study design (processing number: 337/12 and 41/14). The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trial Registry and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the WHO, with assigned numbers DRKS00004769 and DRKS00005978.
Human right statement
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- 1.Kieferheilkunde DGfZ-Mu. s2k-Leitlinie. Dentale digitale Volumentomographie. 2013; (Maxillofacial Surgery. DGfZ-Mu. s2k guideline. Dental digital volume tomography). http://www.dgzmk.de/uploads/tx_szdgzmkdocuments/20120508_Leitlinie_navigierte_Implantatinsertion.pdf2012
- 4.Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery—a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:305–13.Google Scholar
- 14.Schnutenhaus S, Dreyhaupt J, Doering I, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Alveolar ridge preservation as a way to reduce the need for bone augmentation: implementation of a mew, non-invasive method of measuring bone preservation: study protocol of a randomized controlled clinical trial and feasibility testing results. Int J Clin Res Trials. 2017;2:116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Mangano FG, Zecca PA, van Noort R, Apresyan S, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, et al. Custom-made computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacturing biphasic calcium-phosphate scaffold for augmentation of an atrophic mandibular anterior ridge. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:941265.Google Scholar