Cone-beam computed tomography and anatomical observations of normal variants in the mandible: variant dentists should recognize
- 81 Downloads
Many types of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) have recently been developed and are being used in many dental clinics. CBCT has significantly changed imaging diagnosis in dentistry by showing detailed structures in multiple dimensions with high spatial resolution. This allows dentists to confirm what cannot be recognized with conventional two-dimensional images, such as small neurovascular canals, the buccolingual location of structures/lesions, and the three-dimensional shapes of hard tissue structures. The aim of this study was to review the normal variants of detailed anatomical structures in relation with the mandibular canal by comparing the previous reports and anatomical evaluations. These structures are likely to be observed on CBCT images by dental practitioners prior to dental procedures involving the mandibular teeth and bone. Understanding the relationship of these structures is useful for dental practitioners and oral surgeons to reduce the possibility of causing damage and patient discomfort during dental procedures.
KeywordsMandible Mandibular canal Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) Anatomy Normal variant
The authors received no funding for the preparation of this manuscript, but part of the results included in this review article were supported by a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (Grant Numbers JP20791376 and 24792013). The authors thank Dr. Yasuo Kumazawa (Professor Emeritus, Nippon Dental University) for his assistance.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Taisuke Kawai, Iwao Sato, Rieko Asaumi, and Takashi Yosue declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human rights statement and informed consent
- 8.Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113:817–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.American Association of Endodontists; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:234–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Harris D, Horner K, Grondahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, et al. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1243–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Kawai T, Asaumi R, Sato I, Kumazawa Y, Yosue T. Evaluation of the course of the incisive branch of mandibular canal using CBCT. The 19th International Congress of Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology, Bergen, 2013; Program p 45.Google Scholar
- 49.Liang X, Jacobs R, Lambrichts I. An assessment on spiral CT scan of the superior and inferior genial spinal foramina and canals. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;9:1–7.Google Scholar
- 57.Kawai T, Asaumi R, Sato I, Yosue T. Lateral lingual foramina of the mandible: cadavers study with CBCT. Clin Oral Imp Res. 2010;21:1168.Google Scholar
- 62.Imamura H, Sato H, Matsuura T, Ishikawa M, Zeze R. A comparative study of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of mandibular canals and cross-sectional areas in diagnosis prior to dental implant treatment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6:75–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar