Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Knowledge and practice regarding safety standards of oral radiology among dental practitioners in western Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the knowledge and practice regarding safety standards of oral radiology among dental practitioners in Mumbai, India.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 dental practitioners. Data related to methods of radiation protection were collected by a predesigned, pretested, self-administered questionnaire. The data were analyzed and the results expressed in percentages.

Results

The bisecting angle technique was preferred by 69.2 % of the practitioners. Most of the X-ray machines had a pointed cone (60.6 %) type of position-indicating device. Both conventional films and digital sensors were used as image receptors with slight preference for the latter (44.8 vs. 55.1 %, respectively). Approximately three-fourths of the dental practitioners (75.4 %) used E-speed films, and in 48.0 % of cases, either dentists or assistants held the X-ray film with their fingers while taking radiographs. Most of the practitioners used a lead apron for patient protection either regularly (23.6 %) or occasionally (48.0 %). A total of 40.9 % of the dentists stood near the patient without wearing a lead apron during exposure. Only 14.7 % were aware of the position-and-distance rule, which is used when no protective barrier is present. Nearly half of the dentists changed the exposure time according to the patient and region to be radiographed.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that more work must be done to increase the knowledge of radiation protection among practicing dentists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Math SY, Murugeshappa DG, Annigeri R, Kalra D. Compliance of Indian dentists with oral radiology safety measures. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2013;1:104–10.

  2. 2.

    Binnal A, Rajesh G, Denny C, Ahmed J, Nayak V. Insights into the state of radiation protection among a subpopulation of Indian dental practitioners. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43:253–9.

  3. 3.

    Jacobs R, Vanderstappen M, Bogaerts R, Gijbels F. Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:334–9.

  4. 4.

    Kuba R, Kohli A. Continuing professional development of dentists through distant learning: an Indira Gandhi National Open University-Dental Council of India experiment a report. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25:821–7.

  5. 5.

    Sheikh S, Pallagatti S, Singla I, Gupta R, Aggarwal A, Singh R, et al. Survey of dental radiographical practice in States of Punjab and Haryana in India. J Investig Clin Dent. 2014;5:72–7.

  6. 6.

    White SC, Pharoah MJ. Health physics. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 5th ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2004. p. 47–68.

  7. 7.

    Ilgüy D, Ilgüy M, Dincer S, Bayırlı G. Survey of dental radiological practice in Turkey. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:222–7.

  8. 8.

    Shahab S, Kavosi A, Nazarinia H, Mehralizadeh S, Mohammadpour M, Emami M. Compliance of Iranian dentists with safety standards of oral radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:159–64.

  9. 9.

    Lee BD, Ludlow JB. Attitude of the Korean dentists towards radiation safety and selection criteria. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43:179–84.

  10. 10.

    Aps JK. Flemish general dental practitioners’ knowledge of dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:113–8.

  11. 11.

    Bohay RN, Kogon SL, Stephens RG. A survey of radiographic techniques and equipment used by a sample of general dental practitioners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78:806–10.

  12. 12.

    Salti L, Whaites EJ. Survey of dental radiographic services in private dental clinics in Damascus, Syria. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:100–5.

  13. 13.

    Geist JR, Katz JO. The use of radiation dose-reduction techniques in the practices of dental faculty members. J Dent Educ. 2002;66:697–702.

  14. 14.

    Kaviani F, Esmaeili F, Balayi E, Pourfattollah N. Evaluation of X-ray protection methods used in dental offices in Tabrizin 2005–2006. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007;1:49–52.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank all participants of the study. This study was self-funded.

Author information

Correspondence to Vikrant O. Kasat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Vikrant O. Kasat, Ruchi Ladda, Saurabh Joshi, Purushottam A. Giri, Manali Pandya, and Safia Shaikh declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for inclusion in the study.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasat, V.O., Ladda, R., Joshi, S. et al. Knowledge and practice regarding safety standards of oral radiology among dental practitioners in western Maharashtra, India. Oral Radiol 33, 1–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-016-0234-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dental practitioners
  • Dental radiography
  • Dental X-ray film
  • Radiation protection