Advertisement

Oral Radiology

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 219–225 | Cite as

Infraorbital ethmoid (Haller) cells: a cone-beam computed tomographic study

  • Filiz Namdar PekinerEmail author
  • M. Oğuz Borahan
  • Asım Dumlu
  • Semih Özbayrak
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

Infraorbital ethmoid (Haller) cells are extensions of the anterior ethmoid sinus into the floor of the orbit and superior aspect of the maxillary sinus. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the frequency, volume, and surface area of infraorbital ethmoid cells on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

In this retrospective study, 150 CBCT evaluations were determined for infraorbital ethmoid cells. One CBCT examination was carried out for each of the patients and interpreted for the presence of infraorbital ethmoid cells. Volumetric measurements were performed using CBCT scans. All of the CBCT scans were assessed and analyzed using MIMICS 14.0 software.

Results

In the 150 CBCT evaluations, 65 (43.3 %) were noted as having infraorbital ethmoid cells. In these patients, 47 (31.3 %) were unilateral and 18 (12 %) bilateral. The majority of the cells were round in shape. The frequency of unilocular infraorbital ethmoid cells occurring unilaterally was highly significant. There were no significant differences in the volume and surface area of right and left infraorbital ethmoid cells between males and females.

Conclusions

Infraorbital ethmoid cells were well demonstrated and the volume and surface area of infraorbital ethmoid cell could be measured on CBCT scans. These cells may provide useful differential diagnoses for patients suffering from orofacial pain of sinus origin.

Keywords

Cone-beam computed tomography Infraorbital ethmoid cells Volume Surface area 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was presented at the 19th European Congress of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology held from 22–27 June 2013 in Bergen, Norway. It was supported by the Marmara University Scientific Research Project Council (Project no: SAG-D-100413-0121).

Conflict of interest

Filiz Namdar Pekiner, M. Oğuz Borahan, Asım Dumlu, and Semih Özbayrak declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statements and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    de Oliveria AG, dos Santos Silveira O, Francio LA, de Andrade Marigo Grandinetti H, Manzi FR. Anatomic variations of paranasal sinuses-clinical case report. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35:535–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scuderi AJ, Harnsberger HR, Boyer RS. Pneumatization of paranasal sinuses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:1101–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raina A, Guledgud MV, Patil K. Infraorbital ethmoid (Haller’s) cells: a panoramic radiographic study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:305–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basic N, Basic V, Jukic T, Basic M, Jelic M, Hat J. Computed tomographic imaging to determine the frequency of anatomical variations in pneumatization of the ethmoid bone. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;256:69–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kainz J, Braun H, Genser P. Haller’s cells: morphologic evaluation and clinico-surgical relevance. Laryngorhinootol. 1993;72:599–604 (in German).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahmad M, Khurana N, Jaberi J, Sampair C, Kuba RK. Prevalence of infraorbital ethmoid (Haller’s) cells on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:658–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sivaslı E, Sirikçi A, Bayazıt YA, Gümüşburun E, Erbağcı H, Bayram M, et al. Anatomic variations of the paranasal sinus area in pediatric patients with chronic sinusitis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;24:400–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tonai A, Baba S. Anatomic variations of the bone in sinonasal CT. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1996;525:9–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luxenberger W, Anderhuber W, Stammberger H. Mucocele in an orbitoethmoidal (Haller’s) cell (accidentally combined with acute contralateral dacryocystitis). Rhinology. 1999;37:37–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ. The functional endoscopic approach to inflammatory sinus disease: current perspectives and technique modifications. Am J Rhinol. 1988;2:89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stammberger HR, Posawetz W. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;247:63–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Omami G. Palatine recess of maxillary sinus masquerading as radiolucent lesion: case report. Libyan Dent J. 2013;3:14815171.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stackpole SA, Edelstein DR. The anatomic relevance of the Haller cell in sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 1997;11:219–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schulz B, Potente S, Zangos S, Friedrichs I, Bauer RW, Kerl M, et al. Ultra-low dose dual-source high-pitch computed tomography of the paranasal sinus: diagnostic sensitivity and radiation dose. Acta Radiol. 2012;53:435–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hagtvedt T, Aaløkken TM, Nøtthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A. A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:976–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:35–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zoumalan RA, Lebowitz RA, Wang E, Yung K, Babb JS, Jacobs JB. Flat panel cone beam computed tomography of the sinuses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:841–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Batra PS, Kanowitz SJ, Citardi MJ. Clinical utility of intraoperative volume computed tomography scanner for endoscopic sinonasal and skull base procedures. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22:511–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:83–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mathew R, Omami G, Hand A, Fellows D, Lurie A. Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:20130055.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wanamaker HH. Role of Haller’s cell in headache and sinus disease: a case report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114:324–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bolger WE, Butzin CA, Parsons DS. Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1991;101:56–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kayalıoğlu G, Oyar O, Govsa F. Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus bony variations: a computed tomographic study. Rhinology. 2000;38:108–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kantarcı M, Karasen RM, Alper F, Onbaş O, Okur A, Karaman A. Remarkable anatomic variations in paranasal sinus region and their clinical importance. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50:296–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Milczuk HA, Dalley RW, Wessbacher FW, Richardson MA. Nasal and paranasal sinus anomalies in children with chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope. 1993;103:247–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Panou E, Motro M, Ateş M, Acar A, Erverdi N. Dimensional changes of maxillary sinuses and pharyngeal airway in Class III patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:824–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Darsey MD, English JD, Kau CH, Ellis RK, Akyalçın S. Does hyrax expansion therapy affect maxillary sinus volume? A cone-beam computed tomography report. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012;42:83–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Garrett BJ, Caruso JM, Rungcharassaeng K, Farrage JR, Kim JS, Taylor GD. Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:8–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filiz Namdar Pekiner
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Oğuz Borahan
    • 1
  • Asım Dumlu
    • 1
  • Semih Özbayrak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of DentistryMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations