Oral Radiology

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 71–75 | Cite as

Improved inspection of the lateral pharyngeal recess using cone-beam computed tomography in the upright position

  • Pipop Sutthiprapaporn
  • Keiji Tanimoto
  • Masahiko Ohtsuka
  • Toshikazu Nagasaki
  • Masaru Konishi
  • Yukihiro Iida
  • Akitoshi Katsumata
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the structure of the lateral pharyngeal recess (LPR) and surrounding structures in computed tomography (CT) images obtained from subjects in the supine and upright positions.

Methods

Six subjects were evaluated using cone-beam CT (CBCT) in the upright position, and with a four-row multidetector helical CT (MDCT) in the supine position. All of the voxel sizes were adjusted to 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 mm3 in the x, y, z coordinate system. The posterior nasal spine and basion were used as references. The LPR and surrounding structures were measured and compared in the two different modalities.

Results

In 83% of the cases, the LPR was deeper when the position was changed from supine to upright.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that imaging of the LPR using CBCT with the subject in the upright position is superior to that using MDCT with the subject in the supine position.

Key words

Pharyngeal recess Nasopharynx Carcinoma Gravity Cone-beam CT 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Som PM, Curtin HD. Head and neck imaging. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loh LE, Chee TS, John AB. The anatomy of the fossa of Rosenmüller — its possible influence on the detection of occult nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Singapore Med J 1991;32:154–155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wei WI, Sham JS, Zong YS, Choy D, Ng MH. The efficacy of fiberoptic endoscopic examination and biopsy in the detection of early nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 1991;67:3127–3130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:410–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Araki M, Iwai K, Sawada K, Akiyama Y. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT. J Oral Sci 2006;48:27–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamashina A, Tanimoto K, Sutthiprapaporn P, Hayakawa Y. The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: com- parison with multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:245–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yamashina A, Tanimoto K, Ohtsuka M, Nagasaki T, Sutthiprapaporn P, Iida Y, et al. A morphological comparison of the piriform sinuses in head-on and head-rotated views of seated subjects using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2008;24:64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sutthiprapaporn P, Tanimoto K, Ohtsuka M, Nagasaki T, Iida Y, Katsumata A. Positional changes of oropharyngeal structures to gravity in the upright and supine positions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:130–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin-Du Pan RC, Benoit R, Girardier L. The role of body position and gravity in the symptoms and treatment of various medical diseases. Swiss Med Wkly 2004;134:543–551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Froese AB. Gravity, the belly, and the diaphragm: you can’t ignore physics. Anesthesiology 2006;104:193–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamlet SL, Momiyama Y. Velar activity and timing of Eustachian tube function in swallowing. Dysphagia 1992;7:226–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:212–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sham JS, Wei WI, Zong YS, Choy D, Guo YQ, Luo Y, et al. Detection of subclinical nasopharyngeal carcinoma by fibreoptic endoscopy and multiple biopsy. Lancet 1990;335:371–374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang AR, Liang XM, Chan AT, Chan MK, Teo PM, Johnson PJ. The use of brush cytology and directed biopsies for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and precursor lesions. Head Neck 2001;23:637–645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    King AD, Zee B, Yuen EH, Leung SF, Yeung DK, Ma BB, et al. Nasopharyngeal cancers: which method should be used to measure these irregularly shaped tumors on cross-sectional imaging? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:148–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoe JW. Computed tomography of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A review of CT appearances in 56 patients. Eur J Radiol 1989;9:83–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoe J. CT of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: significance of widening of the preoccipital soft tissue on axial scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:867–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen YK, Su CT, Chi KH, Cheng RH, Wang SC, Hsu CH. Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake patterns in Waldeyer’s ring for differentiating benign from malignant lesions in lateral pharyngeal recess of nasopharynx. J Nucl Med 2007;48:8–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wakisaka M, Mori H, Fuwa N, Matsumoto A. MR analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: correlation of the pattern of tumor extent at the primary site with the distribution of metastasized cervical lymph nodes. Preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2000;10:970–977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    King AD, Ahuja AT, Leung SF, Lam WW, Teo P, Chan YL, et al. Neck node metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma: MR imaging of patterns of disease. Head Neck 2000;22:275–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lagravère MO, Fang Y, Carey J, Toogood RW, Packota GV, Major PW. Density conversion factor determined using a conebeam computed tomography unit NewTom QR-DVT 9000. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:407–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Japan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pipop Sutthiprapaporn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Keiji Tanimoto
    • 1
  • Masahiko Ohtsuka
    • 1
  • Toshikazu Nagasaki
    • 1
  • Masaru Konishi
    • 3
  • Yukihiro Iida
    • 4
  • Akitoshi Katsumata
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Oral Diagnosis, Faculty of DentistryKhon Kaen UniversityKhon KaenThailand
  3. 3.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryTango Furusato HospitalKyotoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Oral RadiologyAsahi University School of DentistryGifuJapan

Personalised recommendations