Advertisement

World Wide Web

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1677–1716 | Cite as

User-side QoS forecasting and management of cloud services

  • Zia ur Rehman
  • Omar Khadeer HussainEmail author
  • Farookh Khadeer Hussain
  • Elizabeth Chang
  • Tharam Dillon
Article

Abstract

Cloud computing is a new computing paradigm in which virtualized hardware and software resources are provided to the users over the Internet as services with pay-as-you-go like pricing mechanisms. This enables the cloud users to fulfil their IT requirements by using virtualized computing resources, located at a cloud service provider, as cloud services over the Internet instead of establishing an in-house computing infrastructure of their own. This is beneficial for the users as they only have to pay for the resources which they are actually using rather than paying for the entire cost of hardware and software, as is the case in other computing paradigms. However, to ensure that users’ achieve their required outcomes, monitoring and managing the QoS of the cloud service they are receiving is a very important aspect. This is different from monitoring and managing the QoS of the cloud service at the platform side which is done by service providers. In this paper, we propose and demonstrate the working of an approach that enables users to forecast and appropriately manage the cloud service based on the QoS they are receiving at their end.

Keywords

Pre-interaction time phase Post-interaction time phase QoS forecasting User-side service management Early warning system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Billah, B., King, M.L., Snyder, R.D., Koehler, A.B.: Exponential smoothing model selection for forecasting. Int. J. Forecast. 22(2), 239–247 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2005.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bisgaard, Sr., Kulahci, M.: Time series model selection and parsimony. Qual. Eng. 21(3), 341–353 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Box, G., Jenkins, G., Reinsel, G.: Time series analysis: forecasting and control, 4th edn. Willey (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao, B.Q., Li, B., Xia Q.M.: A service-oriented qos-assured and multi-agent cloud computing architecture. Cloud Computing pp. 644–649 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cerbelaud, D., Garg, S., Huylebroeck, J.: Opening the clouds: qualitative overview of the state-of-the-art open source VM-based cloud management platforms. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware, pp. 22:1–22:8. Springer, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheung, Y.W., Lai, K.S.: Lag Order and Critical Values of the Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test. J. Bus. & Econ. Stat. 13, 277–280 (1995). doi: 10.2307/1392187 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Dickey, D.A.: Fuller WA Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 427–431 (1979). doi: 10.2307/2286348 zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emeakaroha, V.C., Netto, M.A.S., Calheiros, R.N., Brandic, I., Buyya, R.: De Rose CAF Towards autonomic detection of SLA violations in Cloud infrastructures. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 28, 1017–1029 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.future.2011.08.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferrer, A., Juan Hernndez, F., Tordsson, J., Elmroth, E., Ali-Eldin, A., Zsigri, C., Sirvent, R., Guitart, J., Badia, R.M., Djemame, K., Ziegler, W., Dimitrakos, T., Nair, S.K., Kousiouris, G., Konstanteli, K., Varvarigou, T., Hudzia, B., Kipp, A., Wesner, S., Corrales, M., Forg, N., Sharif, T., Sheridan, C.: OPTIMIS: A holistic approach to cloud service provisioning. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 28, 66–77 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.future.2011.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferretti, S., Ghini, V., Panzieri, F., Pellegrini, M., Turrini, E.: QoS-aware clouds. In: Proceedings - 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, CLOUD 2010, pp. 321–328 (2010). doi: 10.1109/CLOUD.2010.17
  12. 12.
    Gardner, E.S.: Exponential smoothing: The state of the art. J. Forecast. 4(1), 1–28 (1985). doi: 10.1002/for.3980040103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gardner, E.S.: Exponential smoothing: The state of the artPart II. Int. J. Forecast. 22(4), 637–666 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gardner, E.S., Mckenzie, E.: Forecasting Trends in Time Series. Manag. Sci. 31(10), 1237–1246 (1985). doi: 10.1287/mnsc.31.10.1237 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greenlee, M.: The rise of cloud service management services (2013). http://blogs.sap.com/innovation/cloud-computing/the-rise-of-cloud-service-management-services-0108040
  16. 16.
    Holt, C.C.: Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages. Int. J. Forecast. 20(1), 5–10 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hussain, O.K., Dillon, T.S., Hussain, F.K., Chang, E.J.: Risk Assessment and Management in the Networked Economy. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hyndman, R., Khandakar, Y.: Automatic Time Series Forecasting: The forecast Package for R. J. Stat. Softw. 27(3) (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hyndman, R., Koehler, A.B., Ord, J.K.: Snyder RD Forecasting with Exponential Smoothing: The State Space Approach. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hyndman, R.J., Koehler A.B.: Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. Int. J. Forecast. 22(4), 679–688 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hyndman, R.J., Koehler, A.B., Snyder, R.D., Grose, S.A.: state space framework for automatic forecasting using exponential smoothing methods. Int. J. Forecast 18(3), 439–454 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0169-2070(01)00110-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leavitt, N.: Is cloud computing really ready for prime time? In: IT Professional vol 42, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 15–20 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, Y.C., Zomaya, A.Y.: Energy efficient utilization of resources in cloud computing systems. J. Supercomput. 60, 268–280 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s11227-010-0421-3 [URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11227-010-0421-3]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lombardi, F.: Di Pietro R Secure virtualization for cloud computing. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 34, 1113–1122 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2010.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Machida, F., Andrade, E., Kim, D.S., Trivedi, K.S.: Candy: Component-based availability modeling framework for cloud service management using SysML. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, pp. 209–218 (2011). doi: 10.1109/SRDS.2011.33
  26. 26.
    Makridakis, S., Hibon, M.: The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications. Int. J. Forecast. 16(4), 451–476 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00057-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., Ghalsasi, A.: Cloud Computing The Business Perspective. Decis. Support. Syst. 51(1), 176–189 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maurer, C., Raghavan, V. A.: Linear time algorithm for computing exact Euclidean distance transforms of binary images in arbitrary dimensions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 25(2), 265–270 (2003). doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1177156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morin, J.H., Aubert, J., Gateau, B.: Towards Cloud Computing SLA Risk Management: Issues and Challenges. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 5509–5514 (2012). doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.602
  30. 30.
    Ord, J.K., Koehler, A.B.: Snyder RD Estimation and Prediction for a Class of Dynamic Nonlinear Statistical Models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 92, 1621–1629 (1997). doi: 10.2307/2965433 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Park, K.W., Han, J., Chung, J., Park, K.H.: Themis: A mutually verifiable billing system for the cloud computing environment. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 6, 300–313 (2013). doi: 10.1109/TSC.2012.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pegels, C.C.: Exponential Forecasting: Some New Variations. Manag. Sci. 15, 311–315 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rehman, Z.U., Hussain, O.K., Hussain, F.K.: Parallel Cloud Service Selection and Ranking Based on QoS History (2013). URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10766-013-0276-3
  34. 34.
    Rodero-Merino, L., Vaquero, L.M., Gil, V., Galán, F., Fontán, J., Montero, R.S., Llorente, I.M.: From infrastructure delivery to service management in clouds. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 26(8), 1226–1240 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.future.2010.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taheri, J., Zomaya, A.Y., Siegel, H.J., Tari, Z.: Pareto frontier for job execution and data transfer time in hybrid clouds. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 37, 321–334 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.future.2013.12.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Taylor, J.W.: Exponential smoothing with a damped multiplicative trend. Int. J. Forecast. 19, 715–725 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0169-2070(03)00003-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Feng, J.: On the Euclidean distance of images. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 27(8), 1334–9 (2005). doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang, X., Du, Z., Liu, X., Xie, H., Jia, X.: An adaptive QoS management framework for VoD cloud service centers. In: ICCASM 2010 - 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling, Proceedings, vol 1 (2010). doi: 10.1109/ICCASM.2010.5619436
  39. 39.
    Wen, X., Gu, G., Li, Q., Gao, Y., Zhang, X.: Comparison of open-source cloud management platforms: OpenStack and OpenNebula. In: 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), IEEE, Sichuan, China, pp. 2457–2461 (2012). doi: 10.1109/FSKD.2012.6234218
  40. 40.
    Winters, P.R.: Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages. Manag. Sci. 6(3), 324–342 (1960)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zia ur Rehman
    • 1
  • Omar Khadeer Hussain
    • 2
    Email author
  • Farookh Khadeer Hussain
    • 3
  • Elizabeth Chang
    • 2
  • Tharam Dillon
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceCOMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT)AbbottabadPakistan
  2. 2.School of Business, University of New South WalesADFACanberraAustralia
  3. 3.Decision Support and e-Service Intelligence Laboratory, Quantum Computation and Intelligent Systems Laboratory, School of SoftwareUniversity of Technology, SydneySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Computer Science and Computer EngineeringLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations