Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

VARK Learning Style Classification Using Decision Tree with Physiological Signals

Abstract

Learning style is deemed crucial for different types of age groups. It is essential, especially for individual learning achievement. Learning is a part of cognitive processes affecting the human central nervous system, which can be monitored by using the physiological signals. In this study, physiological signals thus are proposed as key attributes for the classification of learning styles to avoid biased data from completing the questionnaire and promote the real-time response in the classroom environment. More specifically, heart rate and blood pressure signals are chosen for this study. Following the VARK model, the physiological signals of learners are classified with the decision tree into four different types, including visual, aural, read and write, and kinesthetic learners. There are 40 primary school children and 30 university students involved in the whole study. The results show that the proposed factors obtain 85% and 90% classification accuracy for children and university students, respectively. Both heart rate and blood pressure are thus reasonably impacted as the classification attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Rochford, R. A. (2003). Assessing learning styles to improve the quality of performance of community college students in developmental writing programs: A pilot study. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,27(8), 665–677.

  2. 2.

    Dunn, R., & Stevenson, J. M. (1997). Teaching diverse college students to study with a learning-styles prescription. College Student Journal,31, 333–339.

  3. 3.

    Valiente, C. (2008). Are students using the’wrong’style of learning? A multicultural scrutiny for helping teachers to appreciate differences. Active Learning in Higher Education,9(1), 73–91.

  4. 4.

    Hairudin, H. (2002). Learning style teaching. Utusan Malaysia 16 Ogos,4(2), 153–163.

  5. 5.

    Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (2014). Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Abingdon: Routledge.

  6. 6.

    Amira, R., & Jelas, Z. M. (2010). Teaching and learning styles in higher education institutions: Do they match? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,7, 680–684.

  7. 7.

    Prithishkumar, I. J., & Michael, S. A. (2014). Understanding your student: Using the VARK model. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine,60(2), 183.

  8. 8.

    Vark Learn (Nd)Vark Questionnaire. Retrived from http://vark-learn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/The-VARK-Questionnaire.pdf.

  9. 9.

    Chanel, G., Kronegg, J., Grandjean, D., & Pun, T. (2006). Emotion assessment: Arousal evaluation using EEG’s and peripheral physiological signals. In International Workshop on Multimedia Content Representation, Classification and Security (pp. 530–537). Springer, Berlin.

  10. 10.

    Richards, J. E. (1985). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia predicts heart rate and visual responses during visual attention in 14 and 20 week old infants. Psychophysiology,22(1), 101–109.

  11. 11.

    Laumann, K., Gärling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2003). Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. Journal of environmental psychology,23(2), 125–134.

  12. 12.

    Beymer, D., & Flickner, M. (2003). Eye gaze tracking using an active stereo head. In 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. II-451). IEEE.

  13. 13.

    Elwess, N. L., & Vogt, F. D. (2005). Heart rate and stress in a college setting. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching,31(4), 20–23.

  14. 14.

    Lyngdoh, T., Viswanathan, B., Kobrosly, R., van Wijngaarden, E., Huber, B., Davidson, P. W., et al. (2013). Blood pressure and cognitive function: A prospective analysis among adolescents in the Seychelles. Journal of Hypertension,31(6), 1175–1182.

  15. 15.

    Leopold, L. (2012). Prewriting tasks for auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learners. TESL Canada Journal,29(2), 96.

  16. 16.

    Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education,5(1), 1–19.

  17. 17.

    Richland, K. (2018). The visual learner. Retrieved February 10, 2020 from https://pridereadingprogram.com/the-visual-learner/.

  18. 18.

    Marcy, V. (2001). Adult learning styles: How the VARK Learning Styles Inventory can be used to improve student learning. Perspectives on Physician Assistant Education,12(2), 117–120.

  19. 19.

    Alkhasawneh, I. M., Mrayyan, M. T., Docherty, C., Alashram, S., & Yousef, H. Y. (2008). Problem-based learning (PBL): Assessing students’ learning preferences using VARK. Nurse Education Today,28(5), 572–579.

  20. 20.

    Murphy, R. J., Gray, S. A., Straja, S. R., & Bogert, M. C. (2004). Student learning preferences and teaching implications. Journal of Dental Education,68(8), 859–866.

  21. 21.

    Javadinia, A., Sharifzade, G., Abedini, M., Khalesi, M., & Erfaniyan, M. (2012). Learning styles of medical students in Birjand University of medical sciences according to VARK model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education,11(6), 584–589.

  22. 22.

    Pritchard, A. (2008). Ways of learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the classroom. Abingdon: Routledge.

  23. 23.

    Dutsinma, F. L., Chaising, S., Srimaharaj, W., Chaisricharoen, R., & Temdee, P. (2018). Identifying child learning style by using human physiological response and Vark model. In The 6th Global Wireless Summit, Chiang Rai, Thailand.

  24. 24.

    Palomba, D., Angrilli, A., & Mini, A. (1997). Visual evoked potentials, heart rate responses and memory to emotional pictorial stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology,27(1), 55–67.

  25. 25.

    Merrifield, C., & Danckert, J. (2014). Characterizing the psychophysiological signature of boredom. Experimental Brain Research,232(2), 481–491.

  26. 26.

    Mezzacappa, E. S. (1999). Epinephrine, arousal, and emotion: A new look at two-factor theory. Cognition and Emotion,13(2), 181–199.

  27. 27.

    Chrousos, G. P. (1998). Stressors, stress, and neuroendocrine integration of the adaptive response: The 1997 Hans Selye Memorial Lecture. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,851(1), 311–335.

  28. 28.

    Mucci, N., Giorgi, G., De Pasquale Ceratti, S., Fiz-Pérez, J., Mucci, F., & Arcangeli, G. (2016). Anxiety, stress-related factors, and blood pressure in young adults. Frontiers in Psychology,7, 1682.

  29. 29.

    Gazzellini, S., Dettori, M., Amadori, F., Paoli, B., Napolitano, A., Mancini, F., et al. (2016). Association between attention and heart rate fluctuations in pathological worriers. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,10, 648.

  30. 30.

    Peltola, M. J., Leppänen, J. M., & Hietanen, J. K. (2011). Enhanced cardiac and attentional responding to fearful faces in 7-month-old infants. Psychophysiology,48(9), 1291–1298.

  31. 31.

    Gasperin, D., Netuveli, G., Dias-da-Costa, J. S., & Pattussi, M. P. (2009). Effect of psychological stress on blood pressure increase: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cadernos de saude publica,25, 715–726.

  32. 32.

    Carapetian, S., Siedlarz, M., Jackson, S., & Perlmuter, L. C. (2008). Orthostatic blood pressure regulation predicts classroom effort in children. International Journal of Psychophysiology,68(1), 70–74.

  33. 33.

    Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D. J., & Taylor, C. C. (1994). Machine learning. Neural and Statistical Classification,13(1994), 1–298.

  34. 34.

    Ayodele, T. O. (2010). Types of machine learning algorithms. In Y. Zhang (Ed.), New advances in machine learning. ISBN:978–953–307–034–6. Intech. Retrieved September 2, 2019 from https://www.intechopen.com/books/new-advances-in-machine-learning/types-of-machine-learning-algorithms.

  35. 35.

    McIver, D. K., & Friedl, M. A. (2002). Using prior probabilities in decision-tree classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment,81(2–3), 253–261.

  36. 36.

    Safavian, S. R., & Landgrebe, D. (1991). A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,21(3), 660–674.

  37. 37.

    Du, W., & Zhan, Z. (2002). Building decision tree classifier on private data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security and Data Mining (Vol. 14, pp. 1–8). Australian Computer Society, Inc.

  38. 38.

    Al-Radaideh, Q. A., Al-Shawakfa, E. M., & Al-Najjar, M. I. (2006). Mining student data using decision trees. In International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT’2006). Yarmouk University, Jordan.

  39. 39.

    Kalles, D., & Pierrakeas, C. (2006). Analyzing student performance in distance learning with genetic algorithms and decision trees. Applied Artificial Intelligence,20(8), 655–674.

  40. 40.

    Cortez, P., & Silva, A. M. G. (2008). Using data mining to predict secondary school student performance. Retrieved February 10, 2020 from https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/8024/1/student.pdf.

  41. 41.

    Ocepek, U., Bosnić, Z., Šerbec, I. N., & Rugelj, J. (2013). Exploring the relation between learning style models and preferred multimedia types. Computers & Education,69, 343–355.

  42. 42.

    Hamoud, A., Hashim, A. S., & Awadh, W. A. (2018). Predicting student performance in higher education institutions using decision tree analysis. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence,5(2), 26–31.

  43. 43.

    M. A. (n.d.). Memorize the 10 longest rivers in the world 10X faster. Retrieved September 2, 2019 from https://www.memorize.academy/blog/how-to-memorize-the-ten-longest-rivers-in-the-world.

  44. 44.

    Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly,21(1), 87–111.

  45. 45.

    Dunn, R., Beaudry, J. S., & Klavas, A. (2002). Survey of research on learning styles. California Journal of Science Education,2(2), 75–98.

  46. 46.

    Taylor, H. A., & Tenbrink, T. (2013). The spatial thinking of origami: Evidence from think-aloud protocols. Cognitive Processing,14(2), 189–191.

  47. 47.

    Paulino, G. H. (n.d.). Georgia institute of technology school of civil and environmental engineering. Retrieved August 12, 2019 from https://ce.gatech.edu/news/week-japan-takes-origami-engineering-class-roots-and-pioneers-their-subject.

  48. 48.

    Glass, L., Krueger, F., Solomon, J., Raymont, V., & Grafman, J. (2012). Mental paper folding performance following penetrating traumatic brain injury in combat veterans: A lesion mapping study. Cerebral Cortex,23(7), 1663–1672.

  49. 49.

    Grimm, J. (1955). Snow White and the seven dwarfs. Noida: Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

  50. 50.

    Khan Academy. (2017). Reflections on leaving Facebook. Retrieved September 2, 2019 from https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/critical-analysis-and-reasoning-skills-practice-questions/critical-analysis-and-reasoning-skills-tutorial/e/reflections-on-leaving-facebook.

  51. 51.

    Fleming (nd). VARK. A guide to learning styles. Retrieved February 7, 2019 from https://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/?p=questionnaire.

  52. 52.

    The VARK questionnaire for younger people. Retrieved February 7, 2019 from https://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/the-vark-questionnaire-for-younger-people/.

  53. 53.

    Meleen, M. (n.d.). Learning style tests for children. Retrieved February 7, 2019 from https://kids.lovetoknow.com/wiki/Learning_Style_Test_for_Children.

  54. 54.

    Kudielka, B. M., Buske-Kirschbaum, A., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2004). Differential heart rate reactivity and recovery after psychosocial stress (TSST) in healthy children, younger adults, and elderly adults: the impact of age and gender. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine,11(2), 116–121.

  55. 55.

    Cardiovascular, B. (2008). Blood pressure chart. Retrieved February 7, 2019 from https://www.bloodpressureuk.org/BloodPressureandyou/Thebasics/Bloodpressurechart.

  56. 56.

    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2007). A pocket guide to blood pressure measurement in children. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.

  57. 57.

    MacGill, M. (2017). Heart rate: What is a normal heart rate? Retrieved February 7, 2019 from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/235710.php.

  58. 58.

    Menditto, A., Patriarca, M., & Magnusson, B. (2007). Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision. Accreditation and Quality Assurance,12(1), 45–47.

  59. 59.

    Story, M., & Congalton, R. G. (1986). Accuracy assessment: A user’s perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,52(3), 397–399.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mae Fah Luang University supports this study, and the author remains grateful for the materials, grants, and tools provided to him by the noble university. Also, will like to thank Dr. Pradorn Sureephong, Mrs. Baratu, and Dr. Irshad Ansari for their endless advice during this paper. Finally, the kind staff and students of Huay Ploo Pittaya primary school Chiang Rai and the university student of Mae Fah Luang University for a cooperative data collection experience.

Author information

Correspondence to Punnarumol Temdee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutsinma, L.I.F., Temdee, P. VARK Learning Style Classification Using Decision Tree with Physiological Signals. Wireless Pers Commun (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07196-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • VARK model
  • Physiological signal
  • Learning style
  • Blood pressure
  • Heart rate
  • Decision tree