Sigma-Delta Modulation Based Adaptive Channel Equalizer Based on Wiener–Hopf Equations

  • Aneela PathanEmail author
  • Tayab D. Memon


Recenlty, short word length DSP systems are proposed and reported that they outperform compared to their counterpart multi-bit systems in the sense of area-performance-power analysis. In this continuation, this paper presents the application of sigma-delta modulation (SDM) in the design of adaptive channel equalizer using the Wiener filter for wireless and underwater acoustic communication (UWA). To validate the application, various aspects of design are taken into consideration and comparison is carried out with contemporary (i.e., multi-bit) approach. Besides, FPGA based implementation of SDM based design and conventional approach is also carried out to endorse the proposed algorithm to be used in hardware based implementation. The results given in terms of area -perfromance analysis show that proposed algorithm works as desired and it opens the way of using the sigma-delta modulation in adaptive signal processing domain for UWA that has remained a quite challenging task ever before.


Sigma-delta modulation Short word length systems Acoustic communication Wiener–Hopf FPGA 



This research work is supported by the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan under the National Research Program for Universities (NRPU) grant Number 8521 and National Center for Robotics and Automation (NCRA) joint lab titled “Haptics, Human Robotics and Condition Monitoring Systems (HHCMS) Lab” established at Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro.


  1. 1.
    Pham, T. C., Hoang, B. X., Chiem, Q. T., Tran, L. D., & Ho, A.-V. (2018). Implementation of a short word length ternary FIR filter in both FPGA and ASIC. In 2018 2nd International conference on recent advances in signal processing, telecommunications & computing (SigTelCom), pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Memon, T., Beckett, P., & Sadik, A. Z. (2012). Sigma-delta modulation based digital filter design techniques in FPGA. ISRN Electronics, 2012, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Memon, T. D., Beckett, P., & Sadik, A. Z. (2013). Power-area-performance characteristics of FPGA-based sigma-delta fir filters. Journal of Signal Processing Systems,70, 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. C. Thompson, P. J. O'Shea, and Z. Hussain, “Performance of a new single-bit ternary filtering system,” 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson, A. C., O'Shea, P., Hussain, Z. M., & Steele, B. R. (2004). Efficient single-bit ternary digital filtering using sigma-delta modulator. IEEE Signal Processing Letters,11, 164–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pfann, E., & Stewart, R. W. (1998). LMS adaptive filtering with/spl Sigma//spl Delta/modulated input signals. IEEE Signal Processing Letters,5, 95–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hussain, Z., O’Shea, P., & Sadik, A. (2006). Adaptive algorithm for ternary filtering. Electronics Letters,42, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Memon, T., Beckett, P., Sadik, A., & O’Shea, P. (2011). Single-bit adaptive channel equalization for narrowband signals. In TENCON 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadik, A., Hussain, Z., & O'Shea, P. (2006). Adaptive algorithm for ternary filtering. Electronics Letters,42, 420–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadik, A. Z., & Hussain, Z. M. (2007). Short word-length LMS filtering. In 2007 9th International symposium on signal processing and its applications, pp 1–4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadik, A. Z., & Hussain, Z. M. (2007) Short word-length LMS filtering. In 2007 9th International symposium on signal processing and its applications, 2007. ISSPA, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xerri, B., Cavassilas, J.-F., & Borloz, B. (2002). Passive tracking in underwater acoustic. Signal Processing,82, 1067–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singer, A. C., Nelson, J. K., & Kozat, S. S. (2009). Signal processing for underwater acoustic communications. IEEE Communications Magazine,47, 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kilfoyle, D. B., & Baggeroer, A. B. (2000). The state of the art in underwater acoustic telemetry. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering,25, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kari, D., Vanli, N. D., & Kozat, S. S. (2016). Adaptive and efficient nonlinear channel equalization for underwater acoustic communication. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.01218.
  16. 16.
    Song, A., & Badiey, M. (2005). Generalized equalization for underwater acoustic communications. In Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE, pp. 1522–1527.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yeo, K., Pelekanakis, K. , & Chitre, M. (2011) Time-domain equalization for underwater acoustic ofdm systems with insufficient cyclic prefix. In OCEANS’11 MTS/IEEE KONA, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Poularikas, A. D., & Ramadan, Z. M. (2006). Adaptive filtering primer with MATLAB. Boca Raton: CRC Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haykin, S. S., Widrow, B., & Widrow, B. (2003). Least-mean-square adaptive filters (Vol. 31). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Widrow, B. (1971). Adaptive filters. In R. E. Kalman, N. DeClaris (Eds.), Aspects of network and system theory, pp. 563–587. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hussain, Z. M., Sadik, A. Z., & O’Shea, P. (2011). Digital signal processing: an introduction with MATLAB and applications. Berlin: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronic EngineeringQuad-e-Awam University of Science and Technology, QUESTLarkanaPakistan
  2. 2.Institute of Information and Communication TechnologiesMehran University of Engineering and TechnologyJamshoroPakistan
  3. 3.Department of Electronic EngineeringMehran University of Enginering and TechnologyJamshoroPakistan
  4. 4.National Center for Robotics and Autoamtion, HHCMS LabMUETJamshoroPakistan

Personalised recommendations