Multi-RAT Aggregation Through Spectrum Reallocation for Future Wireless Networks

  • Apostolos Galanopoulos
  • Fotis FoukalasEmail author
  • Theodoros A. Tsiftsis


Next generation wireless networks are becoming the main focus of the industry by putting efforts to launch beyond 4G (i.e. 5G) communication systems by 2020. Towards the 5G-system vision, the efficient spectrum aggregation by integrating multiple radio access technologies (multi-RAT) is one of the enablers to achieve the highest data rates. To this end, a multi-RAT aggregation is envisioned that can be provided using the spectrum reallocation technique. Spectrum reallocation among multi-RATs can provide spectrum opportunities for aggregation and, thus, the overall spectrum utilization and network capacity increase. Maintaining an optimum quality of experience (QoE) for users of different RATs in such an extremely complex network environment can be facilitated by such a multi-RAT aggregation (spectrum aggregation from different RATs), through spectrum reallocation. To this end, both network and functional architectures are specified and spectrum assignment solutions are proposed in this article. The goal is to efficiently increase the data rates supporting a required QoE for all users.


Spectrum reallocation Spectrum refarming Multi-RAT Carrier aggregation Joint coordination 



This work has been supported by the “Spectrum Overlay through Aggregation of Heterogeneous Dispersed Bands” project, ICT-SOLDER,, FP7 Grant Agreement No. 619687.


  1. 1.
    Kaltenberger, F., Foukalas, F., Holland, O., Pietrzyk, S., Thao, S., & Vivier, G. (2014). Spectrum overlay through aggregation of heterogeneous dispersed bands. In 2014 European conference on networks and communications (EuCNC), 2014 (pp. 1–5).
  2. 2.
    Galinina, O., Pyattaev, A., Andreev, S., Dohler, M., & Koucheryavy, Y. (2015). 5G Multi-RAT LTE-WiFi ultra-dense small cells: Performance dynamics, architecture, and trends. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33(6), 1224–1240. Scholar
  3. 3.
    3GPP, TR 37.870 TSG RAN, Study on multiple radio access technology (multi-rat) joint coordination (release 13), Rel.13 v13.0.0 (June 2015).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Next Generation Mobile Networks, RAN Evolution Project, Multi-rat joint radio operation (mrjro), Rel.13 v 1.1 (March 2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bangerter, B., Talwar, S., Arefi, R., & Stewart, K. (2014). Networks and devices for the 5G era. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(2), 90–96. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, T., Li, G., Huang, B., Miao, Q., Fang, J., Li, P., et al. (2017). Spectrum analysis and regulations for 5G (pp. 27–50). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Massaro, M. (2017). Next generation of radio spectrum management: Licensed shared access for 5G. Telecommunications Policy, 41(5), 422–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sridhar, V., Casey, T., & Hämmäinen, H. (2013). Flexible spectrum management for mobile broadband services: How does it vary across advanced and emerging markets? Telecommunications Policy, 37(2), 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han, S., Liang, Y., Soong, B., & Li, S. (2016). Dynamic broadband spectrum refarming for OFDMA cellular systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(9), 6203–6214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alsohaily, A., & Sousa, E. (2014). Dynamic spectrum management in multi-radio access technology (RAT) cellular systems. IEEE on Wireless Communications Letters, 3(3), 249–252. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramaboli, A. L., Falowo, O. E., & Chan, A. H. (2012). Bandwidth aggregation in heterogeneous wireless networks: A survey of current approaches and issues. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(6), 1674–1690. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin, X., & Viswanathan, H. Dynamic spectrum refarming with overlay for legacy devices. CoRR arXiv:abs/1302.0320.
  13. 13.
    Guohua, Z., Tianle, D., & Li, Y. (2014). A dynamic spectrum re-allocation scheme in GSM and LTE co-existed networks. In: 2014 international symposium on wireless personal multimedia communications (WPMC), 2014 (pp. 595–600).
  14. 14.
    Lim, G., Xiong, C., Cimini, L., & Li, G. (2014). Energy-efficient resource allocation for OFDMA-based Multi-RAT networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(5), 2696–2705. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abbas, N., Hajj, H., Dawy, Z., Jahed, K., & Sharafeddine, S. (2017). An optimized approach to video traffic splitting in heterogeneous wireless networks with energy and QOE considerations. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 83, 72–88. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han, S., chang Liang, Y., & Soong, B.-H. (2014). Spectrum refarming: A new paradigm of spectrum sharing for cellular networks. In 2014 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM), 2014 (pp. 893–898).
  17. 17.
    Han, S., Liang, Y.-C., & Soong, B.-H. (2016). Robust joint resource allocation for OFDMA-CDMA spectrum refarming system. IEEE Transactions on Communications,. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Das, D., & Das, D. (2017). Radio access technology selection in SDN controlled reconfigurable base station. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 61, 189–198. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu, X., & Du, Q. (2016). Utility-function-based radio-access-technology selection for heterogeneous wireless networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 52, 171–182. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alsohaily, A., & Sousa, E. (2014). Unified radio access network operation for multi-radio access technology cellular systems. In 2014 21st international conference on telecommunications (ICT), 2014 (pp. 32–36).
  21. 21.
    Vucevic, N., Perez-Romero, J., Sallent, O., & Agusti, R. (2009). Joint radio resource management for LTE-UMTS coexistence scenarios. In 2009 IEEE 20th international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, 2009 (pp. 12–16).
  22. 22.
    Wireless World Research Forum, Multi-RAT network architecture, Technical Report v 2.0 (November 2013).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    4G Americas, HSPA+LTE carrier aggregation, Technical Report (June 2012).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nasimi, M., Kousha, M., & Hashim, F. (2013). QOE-oriented cross-layer downlink scheduling for heterogeneous traffics in LTE networks. In 2013 IEEE 11th Malaysia international conference on communications (MICC), 2013 (pp. 292–297).
  25. 25.
    Lin, K., Wang, W., Wang, X., Ji, W., & Wan, J. (2015). QOE-driven spectrum assignment for 5G wireless networks using SDR. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(6), 48–55. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aroussi, A., & Mellouk, A. (2014). Survey on machine learning-based QOE-QOS correlation models. In IEEE ComManTel’14 (pp. 48–55).
  27. 27.
    3GPP TS 48.058, Base station controller–base transceiver station (BSC–BTS) interface, Release 13 v13.1.0 (April 2016).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carpin, M., Zanella, A., Rasool, J., Mahmood, K., Grøndalen, O., & Østerbø, O. N. Scheduling policies for the LTE downlink channel: A performance comparison. CoRR arXiv:abs/1409.8633.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.I.S.I. - Industrial Systems InstituteAthena Research and Innovation CenterPlatani, PatrasGreece
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Information EngineeringJinan University (Zhuhai Campus)ZhuhaiChina

Personalised recommendations