Advertisement

On Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of Interference Alignment Feasibility in a MIMO Interference Channel

  • Kosar Ghorbani
  • Abolfazl FalahatiEmail author
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

One of the major problems of applying interference alignment (IA) for handling interference in a multi-user MIMO interference channel, with constant coefficients over time and without symbol extension is the feasibility problem. The feasibility of IA is to determine whether an IA is capable to omit all interferer signals or not, when the parameters of the system such as the number of users and the number of antennas are fixed. Comparing the Ruan sufficient condition of feasibility with González feasibility test, their corresponding matrices are shown to have the same structure in this paper. We claim the row rank fullness of Ruan and González matrices with generic channel matrices satisfy properness condition, which are necessary condition of IA feasibility. Other necessary conditions are extracted by investigating row rank fullness of these matrices. An optimization problem based on the extracted conditions is introduced to obtain the maximum sum degrees of freedom (DoF). The simulation results reveal an upper bound on the sum DoF with the optimization subject to the point to point constraint, the two-user information theory constraint and the extracted constraints.

Keywords

Interference alignment MIMO interference channel Feasibility condition Degrees of freedom (DoF) 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Scott, A. W., & Frobenius, R. (2008). Multiple access techniques: FDMA, TDMA, and CDMA. In RF measurements for cellular phones and wireless data systems (pp. 413–430). New York: Wiley-IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Etkin, R. H., Tse, D., & Wang, H. (2008). Gaussian interference channel capacity to within one bit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,54(12), 5534–5562.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jafar, S., & Fakhereddin, M. (2007). Degrees of freedom for the MIMO interference channel. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,53(7), 2637–2642.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akbari, M., & Falahati, A. (2016). On feasibility conditions for linear interference alignment over cognitive interference channel: A DoF analysis with diversity tradeoff. IETE Journal of Research,62(3), 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peng, S., Liu, Y., Kong, Z., et al. (2016). Spatial degrees of freedom for MIMO interference channel with local channel state information at transmitters. Wireless Personal Communications,89(2), 639–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Akbari, M., & Falahati, A. (2015). Spatial-DoF improvement of MIMO cognitive network through interference fusion in conjunction with alignment. Wireless Personal Communications,82(2), 833–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abdelnasser, A., Hossain, E., & Kim, D. I. (2014). Clustering and resource allocation for dense femto cells in a two-tier cellular OFDMA network. IEEE Transaction on Wireless Communication,13(3), 1628–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cadambe, V., & Jafar, S. (2008). Interference alignment and the degrees of freedom of the K-user interference channel. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,54(8), 3425–3441.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vahdani, R., & Falahati, A. (2015). An interference alignment design with higher multiplexing gain by the reduced channel extension. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2015.2410992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Falahati, A., & Akbari, M. (2016). Interference alignment in space, time and frequency: Achievable DoF analysis. Electronics Letters,52(3), 204–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yetis, C., Gou, T., Jafar, S., & Kayran, A. (2010). On feasibility of interference alignment in MIMO interference networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing,58(9), 4771–4782.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bresler, G., Cartwright, D., & Tse, D. (2014). Feasibility of interference alignment for the MIMO interference channel. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,60(9), 5573–5586.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Razaviyayn, M., Lyubeznik, G., & Luo, Z. Q. (2012). On the degrees of freedom achievable through interference alignment in a MIMO interference channel. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing,60(2), 812–821.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bresler, G., Cartwright, D., & Tse, D. (2011). Feasibility of interference alignment for the MIMO interference channel: The symmetric square case. In 2011 IEEE Information Theory Workshop, 16–20 October 2011 (pp. 447–451).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ruan, L., Lau, V., & Win, M. (2013). The feasibility conditions for interference alignment in MIMO networks. IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing,61(8), 2066–2077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    González, Ó., Beltrán, C., & Santamaría, I. (2014). A feasibility test for linear interference alignment in MIMO channels with constant coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,60(3), 1840–1856.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Razaviyayn, M., Sanjabi, M., & Luo, Z. Q. (2012). Linear transceiver design for interference alignment: Complexity and computation. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory,58(5), 2896–2910.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology (DCCS Lab)TehranIran

Personalised recommendations