Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Low Cost Communication for High Speed Railway

  • 38 Accesses


The demand for wireless communication has widely increased in high-speed railway (HSR). The people demand high capacity and efficient communication independent of their location and speed. As the HSR provides more convenience to people, so the main attention is given to provide the reliable communication inside the train. It is the challenging task due to the high mobility of train and frequent need of handoff. To reduce the number of handoffs, the modified Hata model has been used in this paper. The performance of system is evaluated in terms of outage probability, coverage probability, transmission capacity and number of base stations. Results show improvement in coverage probability, transmission capacity and reduction in the outage probability and number of base stations. Hence, the cost of communication for high mobility vehicles can be reduced by decreasing the number of base stations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11


  1. 1.

    Xu, X., Liu, M., Xiong, J., & Lei, G. (2018). Key technology and application of millimeter wave communications for 5G: A survey. Cluster Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1831-x.

  2. 2.

    Ghazzai, H., Bouchoucha, T., Alsharoa, A., Yaacoub, E., Alouini, M.-S., & Al-Naffouri, T. (2016). Transmit power minimization and base station planning for high-speed trains with multiple moving relays in OFDMA systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,66(1), 175–187.

  3. 3.

    Morosi, S., Piunti, P., & Del, E. (2013). Sleep mode management in cellular networks: A traffic based technique enabling energy saving. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies,24, 331–341.

  4. 4.

    Feng, N. et al. (2017). Performance analysis and evaluation of EDGE system for high-speed railway. In 20th IEEE international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC) (pp. 2051–2056).

  5. 5.

    Abu, A., Haija, A., & Tellambura, C. (2017). Small-macro cell cooperation for HetNet uplink transmission: Spectral efficiency and reliability analyses. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications,35(1), 118–135.

  6. 6.

    Ge, X., Member, S., Cheng, H., Mao, G., & Member, S. (2016). Vehicular communications for 5G cooperative small-cell networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,65(10), 7882–7894.

  7. 7.

    Liu, G., & Jiang, D. (2016). 5G: Vision and requirements for mobile communication system towards year 2020. Chinese Journal of Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5974586.

  8. 8.

    Wu, J., & Fan, P. (2016). A survey on high mobility wireless communications: Challenges, opportunities and solutions. IEEE Access,4, 450–476.

  9. 9.

    Zhao, X., et al. (2014). Comparisons of channel parameters and models for urban microcells at 2 GHz and 5 GHz. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine,56(6), 260–276.

  10. 10.

    Lien, S., Chien, C., Tsai, H., Liang, Y., & Kim, D. I. (2016). Configurable 3GPP licensed assisted access to unlicensed spectrum. IEEE Wireless Communications,23(6), 32–39.

  11. 11.

    Lee, J., Kim, M. D., Liang, J., Park, J. J., & Park, B. (2016). Frequency range extension of the ITU-R NLOS path loss models applicable for urban street environments with 28 GHz measurements. In 10th IEEE European conference on antennas and propagation.

  12. 12.

    Han, S. Y., Abu-ghazaleh, N. B., & Member, S. (2015). Efficient and consistent path loss model for mobile network simulation. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,24(3), 1774–1786.

  13. 13.

    Guan, K., Zhong, Z., Ai, B., & Kurner, T. (2013). Semi-deterministic path-loss modeling for viaduct and cutting scenarios of high-speed railway. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters,12, 789–792.

  14. 14.

    He, R., Zhong, Z., Ai, B., & Ding, J. (2011). Propagation measurements and analysis for high-speed railway cutting scenario. Electronics Letters,47(21), 1167–1168.

  15. 15.

    Liu, X., & Qiao, D. (2018). Location-fair beamforming for high speed railway communication systems. IEEE Access,6, 28632–28642.

  16. 16.

    Hui, B., Kim, J., Chung, H. S., Kim, I. G., & Lee, H. (2016). Efficient Doppler mitigation for high-speed rail communications. In International conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT) (pp. 634–638).

  17. 17.

    Bandara, D., Abadie, A., Melaragno, T., & Wijesekara, D. (2014). Providing wireless bandwidth for high-speed rail operations. Procedia Technology,16, 186–191.

  18. 18.

    Ryan, J., Maccartney, G. R., & Rappaport, T. S. (2017). Indoor office wideband penetration loss measurements at 73 GHz. In IEEE international conference on communications workshops (pp. 228–233).

  19. 19.

    Noureddine, H., Castelain, D., & Pyndiah, R. (2011). Train tracking and shadowing estimation based on received signal strength. In International workshop on communication technologies for vehicles (pp. 1–11). Springer.

  20. 20.

    Wu, Y., Hu, F., Zhu, Y., Kumar, S., & Member, S. (2017). Optimal spectrum handoff control for CRN based on hybrid priority queuing and multi-teacher apprentice learning. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,66(3), 2630–2642.

  21. 21.

    Zhou, F., & Shen, Y. (2017). On the outage probability of localization in randomly deployed wireless networks. IEEE Communications Letters,21(4), 901–904.

  22. 22.

    Kustiawan, I., Liu, C.-Y., & Hsu, D. F. (2017). Vertical handoff decision using fuzzification and combinatorial fusion. IEEE Communications Letters,14(8), 1–4.

  23. 23.

    Ma, B., Wang, D., Cheng, S., & Xie, X. (2017). Modeling and analysis for vertical handoff based on the decision tree in a heterogeneous vehicle network. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2707801.

  24. 24.

    Lu, Y., Xiong, K., Fan, P., Zhong, Z., & Ai, B. (2017). The effect of power adjustment on handover in high-speed railway communication networks. IEEE Access,5, 26237–26250.

  25. 25.

    Yu, X., Luo, Y., & Chen, X. (2015). An optimized seamless dual-link handover scheme for high-speed rail. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,65(10), 8658–8668.

  26. 26.

    De, D., & Mukherjee, A. (2017). Group handoff management in low power microcell-femtocell network. Digital Communications and Networks,3(1), 55–65.

  27. 27.

    Li, X., Tang, Q., & Sun, C. (2015). Energy-efficient link selection scheme in a two-hop relay scenario with considering a mobile relay. IET Communications,9, 2287–2292.

  28. 28.

    Naor, Z., & Das, S. K. (2013). A scalable framework for mobile real-time group communication services. Computer Networks,57(18), 3855–3865.

  29. 29.

    Zhao, J., Liu, Y., Gong, Y., Wang, C., & Fan, L. (2018). A dual-link soft handover scheme for C/U plane split network in high-speed railway. IEEE Access,6, 12473–12482.

  30. 30.

    Ai, B., et al. (2014). Challenges toward wireless communications for high-speed railway. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,15(5), 2143–2158.

  31. 31.

    Maccartney, G. R., Member, S., & Rappaport, T. S. (2017). Rural macrocell path loss models for millimeter wave wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications,35, 1663–1677.

  32. 32.

    He, X. L. R., Zhong, Z., Ai, B., Ding, J., Jiang, W., & Zhang, H. (2014). A standardized path loss model for the GSM-railway based high-speed railway communication systems. In Proceedings of IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring).

  33. 33.

    Dhar Roy, S., & Vamshidhar Reddy, S. R. (2014). Signal strength ratio based vertical handoff decision algorithms in integrated heterogeneous networks. Wireless Personal Communications,77(4), 2565–2585.

  34. 34.

    Hsueh, S., & Liu, K. (2017). An equivalent analysis for handoff probability in heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Communications Letters,21(6), 1405–1408.

  35. 35.

    Goldsmith, A. (2005). Wireless Communications. Cambridge university press.

  36. 36.

    Al-dulaimi, A., Anpalagan, A., Member, S., Cosmas, J., & Member, S. (2016). Spectrum handoff management in cognitive HetNet systems overlaid with femtocells. IEEE Systems Journal,10(1), 335–345.

  37. 37.

    Alpcan, T., Başar, T., & Dey, S. (2006). A power control game based on outage probabilities for multicell wireless data networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,5(4), 890–899.

  38. 38.

    Ijaz, A., et al. (2017). Coverage and rate analysis for downlink HetNets using modified reverse frequency allocation scheme. IEEE access,5, 2489–2502.

  39. 39.

    Kumar, K., Prakash, A., & Tripathi, R. (2017). Spectrum handoff scheme with multiple attributes decision making for optimal network selection in cognitive radio networks. Digital Communication Networks,3, 164–175.

  40. 40.

    Weber, S., Andrews, J. G., Member, S., & Jindal, N. (2010). An overview of the transmission capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications,58(12), 3593–3604.

  41. 41.

    Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Dai, L., Member, S., & Li, J. (2017). Transmission capacity analysis of relay-assisted device-to-device overlay/underlay communication. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics,13(1), 380–389.

  42. 42.

    Stüber, G. L. (2012). Principles of mobile communication. Berlin: Springer.

  43. 43.

    Ren, Y., Li, Y., & Qi, C. (2017). Handover rate analysis for K-Tier heterogeneous cellular networks with general path-loss exponents. IEEE Communications Letters,21(8), 1863–1866.

  44. 44.

    Nisirat, M. A., Alkhawaldeh, S., Ismail, M., & Nissirat, L. (2012). Hata based propagation loss formula using terrain criterion for 1800 MHz. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications,66(10), 855–859.

  45. 45.

    Xiang, N., et al. (2016). The electromagnetic transient model for high-speed railway viaducts struck by lightning based on the decoupling method. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility,58(5), 1541–1548.

  46. 46.

    He, R., Zhong, Z., Ai, B., Ding, J., & Yang, Y. (2012). Propagation measurements and analysis of fading behavior for high speed rail cutting scenarios. In IEEE global communications conference (pp. 5015–5020).

  47. 47.

    Niu, Y., Li, Y., Jin, D., Su, L., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). A survey of millimeter wave (mmWave) communications for 5G: Opportunities and challenges. Wireless Networks,21(8), 2657–2676.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Meenakshi Munjal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Munjal, M., Singh, N.P. Low Cost Communication for High Speed Railway. Wireless Pers Commun 111, 163–178 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06850-9

Download citation


  • Coverage probability
  • Outage probability
  • Hata model
  • High-speed railway (HSR)
  • Path loss