Multi-objective Antenna Selection in a Full Duplex Base Station

  • Mohammad LariEmail author
  • Sina Asaeian


The use of full-duplex (FD) communication systems is a new way to increase spectral efficiency. For this reason, it has received serious attention in the new generation of wireless communication systems. The main challenge of FD systems is self-interference that needs to be reduced appropriately. In this paper, we have considered an FD multi-antenna base station in a cellular network and we have used the antenna selection technique to resolve the self-interference issue. We have also provided a new criterion to select an appropriate antenna. In this new criterion, the antenna selection is modeled as a multi-objective optimization problem. Here, the antennas which simultaneously minimizes interference channel gain and maximizes uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) channel gains are selected for transmission and reception. The base station has to perform well in both the UL and DL and reduce the self-interference simultaneously. Therefore, the multi-objective criterion has a better performance than the single-objective criterion. Although, in conventional antenna selection with the single-objective criterion, only the function of the UL and DL channels or the interference channel is considered. Finally, the simulations show that the new criterion has a higher throughput rate than the other conventional single-objective antenna selection techniques.


Antenna selection Full-duplex communications Multi-objective optimization 



  1. 1.
    Zhang, L., Xiao, M., Gang, W., Alam, M., Liang, Y.-C., & Li, S. (2017). A survey of advanced techniques for spectrum sharing in 5 g networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 24(5), 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews, J. G., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S. V., Lozano, A., Soong, A. C. K., et al. (2014). What will 5 g be? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6), 1065–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xiang, W., Zheng, K., & Shen, X. (2016). 5G mobile communications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, G., Richard Yu, F., Ji, H., Leung, V. C. M., & Li, X. (2015). In-band full-duplex relaying: A survey, research issues and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(2), 500–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sabharwal, A., Schniter, P., Guo, D., Bliss, D. W., Rangarajan, S., & Wichman, R. (2014). In-band full-duplex wireless: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(9), 1637–1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luo, F. L., & Zhang, C. J. (2016). Signal processing for 5G: Algorithms and implementations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lari, M., Mohammadi, A., Abdipour, A., & Lee, I. (2013). Characterization of effective capacity in antenna selection mimo systems. Journal of Communications and Networks, 15(5), 476–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lari, M. (2017). Effective capacity of receive antenna selection mimo-ostbc systems in co-channel interference. Wireless Networks, 23(4), 1223–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Everett, E., Sahai, A., & Sabharwal, A. (2014). Passive self-interference suppression for full-duplex infrastructure nodes. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(2), 680–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nawaz, H., & Tekin, I. (2018). Double-differential-fed, dual-polarized patch antenna with 90 db interport rf isolation for a 2.4 ghz in-band full-duplex transceiver. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 17(2), 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nawaz, H., & Tekin, I. (2017). Compact dual-polarised microstrip patch antenna with high interport isolation for 2.5 ghz in-band full-duplex wireless applications. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 11(7), 976–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, D., Lee, H., & Hong, D. (2015). A survey of in-band full-duplex transmission: From the perspective of PHY and MAC layers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(4), 2017–2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aquilina, P., & Ratnarajah, T. (2017). Linear interference alignment in full-duplex MIMO networks with imperfect CSI. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 65(12), 5226–5243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Almradi, A., & Hamdi, K. A. (2017). Mimo full-duplex relaying in the presence of co-channel interference. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(6), 4874–4885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Almradi, A., Xiao, P., & Hamdi, K. A. (2018). Hop-by-hop ZF beamforming for MIMO full-duplex relaying with co-channel interference. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 66(12), 6135–6149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lari, M., Bassam, S. A., Mohammadi, A., & Ghannouchi, F. M. (2011). Time-multiplexed single front-end multiple-input multiple-output receivers with preserved diversity gain. IET Communications, 5(6), 789–796.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riihonen, T., Werner, S., & Wichman, R. (2011). Mitigation of loopback self-interference in full-duplex mimo relays. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 59(12), 5983–5993.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang, K., Cui, H., Song, L., & Li, Y. (2015). Efficient full-duplex relaying with joint antenna-relay selection and self-interference suppression. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(7), 3991–4005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou, M., Song, L., Li, Y., & Li, X. (2015). Simultaneous bidirectional link selection in full duplex mimo systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(7), 4052–4062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jang, S., Ahn, M., Lee, H., & Lee, I. (2016). Antenna selection schemes in bidirectional full-duplex mimo systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(12), 10097–10100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mohammadi, M. (2016). Analysis of low complexity uplink/downlink full-duplex wireless access with spatially random nodes. IET Communications, 10(14), 1777–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papoulis, A., & Pillai, S. U. (2002). Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes., McGraw-Hill series in electrical engineering: Communications and signal processing New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miettinen, K. (2012). Nonlinear multiobjective optimization., International series in operations research and management science New York: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms., Wiley interscience series in systems and optimization New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical and Computer Engineering FacultySemnan UniversitySemnanIran

Personalised recommendations