Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 110, Issue 2, pp 651–676 | Cite as

Signaling Packet Aggregation and Compression in SIP Network: Modeling and Performance Evaluation

  • Garima Mishra
  • Anupam Gautam
  • S. DharmarajaEmail author
  • Subrat Kar
Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Recent development in communications have increased the demand of internet protocol (IP)-based multimedia conferencing services. Session initiation protocol (SIP) is a signaling protocol used for providing group communication in IP-based next generation network. The conferencing frameworks proposed by Internet Engineering Task Force working groups has limited scalability due to the centralized management of conference control by a single server. In order to overcome this limitation, we propose multiple SIP packet aggregation and compression of common header part of each aggregated packet process. This mechanism increases the bandwidth utilization and processing capability of conference server. A queueing model is developed to describe the process of packet aggregation (PA) and compression at the edge proxy. Using the proposed queueing model, the steady-state probability distribution of the queue length is derived and the average packet transmission delay is obtained. We show the trade-off between the overhead gain and delay. Based on the analytical results, the maximum frame size is optimized for which the average delay of a packet transmission is minimum. A discrete event simulation is performed using network simulator 2 to implement PA and compression mechanism in a SIP network. Further, performance measures are numerically obtained from the simulation results. The simulation results discussed upon the key performance metrics for signaling protocols defined by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T E.721).

Keywords

Session initiation protocol Packet aggregation Compression Batch arrival-batch service Markov chain NS2 simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments which helped improve the manuscript to great extent and gratefully acknowledges for the financial support received from the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), India. Further, Anupam Gautam would like to thank the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research(CSIR), India for providing her financial support through Senior Research Fellowship.

References

  1. 1.
    Barnes, M., Boulton, C., & Levin, O. (2008). RFC 5239-A framework for centralized conferencing. IETF: RFC.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bharati, S., & Zhuang, W. (2013). CAH-MAC: Cooperative ADHOC MAC for vehicular networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(9), 470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bianchi, G. (2000). Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3), 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charfi, E., Gueguen, C., Chaari, L., Cousin, B., & Kamoun, L. (2015). Dynamic frame aggregation scheduler for multimedia applications in IEEE 802.11n networks. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.2942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, X., Chen, M., Li, B., Zhao, Y., Wu, Y., & Li, J. (2013). Celerity: A low-delay multi-party conferencing solution. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(9), 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, T. K., Wu, J. L. C., Yang, F. M., & Leu, J. S. (2014). IEEE 802.16e/m energy-efficient sleep-mode operation with delay limitation in multibroadcast services. International Journal of Communication Systems, 27(1), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cho, Y. H., Jeong, M. S., Nah, J. W., Lee, W. H., & Park, J. T. (2005). Policy-based distributed management architecture for large-scale enterprise conferencing service using SIP. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(10), 1934–1949.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2005.854120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faigl, Z. T. M. (2014). Modeling the signaling overhead in host identity protocol-based secure mobile architectures. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 11(3), 887–920.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Group, I. W., et al. (2004). IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks. part 16: Air interface for fixed broadband wireless access systems. IEEE Std, 802, 16–2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hong, J. H., & Sohraby, K. (2007). On the Asymptotic Analysis of Packet Aggregation Systems, Proceedings of the 2007 15th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, 353–359.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    IEEE Draft Standard for Information Technology-Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems-Local and Metropolitan Area Networks-Specific Requirements-Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications: Amendment 2: Sub 1 GHz License Exempt Operation. IEEE P802.11ah/D4.0, January 2015 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.11REVmc/D3.0) pp. 1–626 (2015).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jin, S., Choi, B. D., & Eom, D. S. (2017). Performance analysis of binary exponential backoff MAC protocol for cognitive radio in the IEEE 802.16 e/m network. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 13(3), 1483–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kamarei, M., Hajimohammadi, M., Patooghy, A., & Fazeli, M. (2015). An efficient data aggregation method for event-driven WSNs: A modeling and evaluation approach. Wireless Personal Communications, 84(1), 745–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knauf, A., Hege, G., Schmidt, T. C., & Wählisch, M. (2010). A virtual and distributed control layer with proximity awareness for group conferencing in P2PSIP. In Principles, systems and applications of IP telecommunications (IPTComm) (pp. 122–133). ACM.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Komolafe, O., & Gardner, R. (2003). Aggregation of VoIP streams in a 3G mobile network: A teletraffic perspective. In Proceedings of 5th European (Conference Publication No. 492) Personal Mobile Communications Conference (pp. 545–549). IET.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koskelainen, P., Schulzrinne, H., & Wu, X. (2002). A SIP-based conference control framework. In Proceedings of the 12th International workshop on network and operating systems support for digital audio and video (pp. 53–61). ACM.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuo, T. W., & Tsai, M. J. (2012). On the construction of data aggregation tree with minimum energy cost in wireless sensor networks: NP-completeness and approximation algorithms. In Proceedings of INFOCOM (pp. 2591–2595). IEEE.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luo, J., Jiang, L., & He, C. (2007). Performance analysis of synchronous wakeup patterns in contention-based sensor networks using a finite queuing model. In Proceedings of global telecommunications conference GLOBECOM (pp. 1334–1338). IEEE.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Malas, D., & Morton, A. (2011). RFC 6076—Basic telephony SIP end-to-end performance metrics. IETF: RFC.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martinez-Bauset, J., Guntupalli, L., & Li, F. Y. (2015). Performance analysis of synchronous duty-cycled MAC protocols. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 4(5), 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Montazerolghaem, A., & Moghaddam, M. H. Y. (2018). Design, implementation and performance evaluation of a proactive overload control mechanism for networks of SIP servers. Telecommunication Systems, 67(2), 309–322.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0337-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosenberg, J. (2006). RFC 4353—A framework for conferencing with the session initiation protocol (SIP). IETF: RFC.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., et al. (2002). RFC 3261—SIP: Session Initiation Protocol. IETF: RFC.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sector, I. T. U. T. S. (1999). Series E, Overall Network Operation, Telephone Service, Service Operation and Human Factors: Operation, Numbering, Routing, and Mobile Services : International Operation : Numbering Plan of the International Telephone Service. ITU-T Recommendation. International Telecommunication Union.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Singh, K., Nair, G., & Schulzrinne, H. (2001). Centralized conferencing using SIP. Internet Telephony Workshop, 7, 57–63.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Venkatesha Prasad, R., Hurni, R., & Jamadagni, H. (2003). A scalable distributed VoIP conferencing using SIP. In: Proceedings. Eighth IEEE international symposium on computers and communication, 2003.(ISCC 2003) (pp. 608–613). IEEE.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, C. Y., & Wei, H. Y. (2009). IEEE 802.11 n MAC enhancement and performance evaluation. Mobile Networks and Applications, 14(6), 760–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yahaya, C., Abd Latiff, M. S., & Mohamed, A. B. (2013). A review of routing strategies for optical burst switched networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 26(3), 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yamada, H., & Higuchi, N. (2001). Voice quality evaluation of IP-based voice stream multiplexing schemes. In Proceedings of 26th annual conference on local computer networks (LCN) (pp. 356–364). IEEE.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang, Z., Che, L., Wang, Z., & Yu, F. (2013). Dynamic network layer for data query in sensor network. International Journal of Communication Systems, 26(8), 1074–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou, X., & Boukerche, A. (2014). An efficient adaptive mac frame aggregation scheme in delay tolerant sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE global communications conference (pp. 277–282). IEEE.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhou, X., & Boukerche, A. (2017). AFLAS: An adaptive frame length aggregation scheme for vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(1), 855–867.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhuo, S., Song, Y. Q., Wang, Z., & Wang, Z. (2012). Queue-MAC: A queue-length aware hybrid CSMA/TDMA MAC protocol for providing dynamic adaptation to traffic and duty-cycle variation in wireless sensor networks. In 9th International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS) (pp. 105–114). IEEE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bharti School of Telecommunication Technology and ManagementIndian Institute of Technology DelhiHauzkhasIndia
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsIndian Institue of Technology DelhiHauzkhasIndia

Personalised recommendations