Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 109, Issue 4, pp 2683–2697 | Cite as

Delay-Aware MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks in Smart Grid

  • Gohar Rahman
  • Zeeshan KaleemEmail author
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The conventional electric grid is converting in to the new emerging smart grid by utilizing information and communication technologies. The smart grid allows both the utilities and consumers to monitor and manage energy consumption effectively with the help of wireless sensor and actor networks (WSANs). WSANs have large number of low-power, low-cost, and multi-functional wireless sensor and actor nodes. The wireless sensor nodes collect the data from the physical condition of environment, while actor nodes perform different tasks according to the application requirements. For the monitoring and controlling of smart grid assets, WSANs can be considered as potential tools having the capability of low cost, high latency, and flexibility. In smart grid environment, WSANs have the problem of delay in channel access due to packet collisions. In this research work, we compare the performance results of various medium access control protocols in order to analyze which one among them is the best with respect to better throughput and minimum delay for WSANs in the smart grid environment.

Keywords

Smart grid Wireless sensor and actuator networks Medium access 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Gungor, V. C., Lu, B., & Hancke, G. P. (2010). Opportunities and challenges of wireless sensor networks in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 57(10), 35573564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Livgard, E. F. (2010). Electricity customers, attitudes towards smart metering. In Proceedings of IEEE ISIE (pp 2519–2523).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Depuru, S. S. S. R., Wang, L., & Devabhaktuni, V. (2011). Smart meters for power grid: Challenges, issues, advantages and status. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6), 27362742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gungor, V. C., Sahin, D., Kocak, T., Ergt, S., Buccella, C., Cecati, C., et al. (2011). Smart grid technologies: Communication technologies and standards. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 7(4), 529–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sood, V. K., Fischer, D., Eklund, J. M., & Brown, T. (2009). Developing a communication infrastructure for the smart grid. In Proceedings of IEEE EPEC (p. 17).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yigit, M., Gungor, V. C., Tuna, G., Rangoussi, M., & Fadel, E. (2014). Power line communication technologies for smart grid applications: A review of advances and challenges. Computer Networks, 70, 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sauter, T., & Lobashov, M. (2011). End-to-end communication architecture for smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(4), 1218–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moslehi, K., & Kumar, R. (2010). Smart grid a reliability perspective. In Innovative smart grid technologies, January 1921 (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, Q., Barria, J. A., & Green, T. C. (2011). Communication infrastructures for distributed control of power distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(2), 316327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaleem, Z., Yoon, T. M., & Lee, C. (2016). Energy efficient outdoor light monitoring and control architecture using embedded system. IEEE Embedded Systems Letters, 8(1), 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kilbourne, B., & Bender, K. (2010). Spectrum for smart grid: Policy recommendations enabling current and future applications. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on smart grid communications (pp. 578–582).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yao, Y., Cao, Q., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2014). EDAL: An energy-efficient, delay-aware, and lifetime-balancing data collection in protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Networking, 23(3), 810–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caete, E., Daz, M., Llopis, L., & Rubio, B. (2012). HERO: A hierarchical, efficient and reliable routing protocol for wireless sensor and actor networks. Computer Communications, 35(11), 1392–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, T. H., & Choi, S. (2006). Priority-based delay mitigation for event monitoring IEEE 802.15.4 LR-WPANs. IEEE Communications Letters, 10(3), 213215.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hammoodi, I. S., Stewart, B. G., Kocian, A., & McMeekin, S. G. (2009). Wireless sensor networks for partial discharge condition monitoring. In Proceedings of 44th UPEC, Glasgow, UK (p. 15).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erol-Kantarci, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2011). Wireless multimedia sensor and actor networks for the next-generation power grid. JAd Hoc Networks, 9(4), 542–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Erol-Kantarci, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2011). Wireless sensor networks for cost efficient residential energy management in the smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2(2), 314325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Al-Anbagi, I., Mouftah, H. T., & Erol-Kantarci, M. (2011). Design of a delay sensitive WSN for wind generation monitoring in the smart grid. In Proceedings of IEEE CCECE (pp. 001370–001373).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Assayad, I., Girault, A., & Kalla, H. (2004). A Bi criteria scheduling heuristic for distributed embedded systems under reliability and real-time constraints. In Proceedings of the dependable systems and networks (pp. 347–356).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pakonen, P., Vehmasvaara, S., Pikkarainen, M., Siddiqui, B. A., & Verho, P. (2012). Experiences on narrow band power line communication of automated meter reading systems in Finland. In Proceedings of the conference on electric power quality and supply reliability (pp. 1–6, 11–13).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bilgin, B. E., & Gungor, V. C. (2011). On the performance of multi-channel wireless sensor networks in smart grid environments. In IEEE international conference on computer communications and networks (pp. 1–6, 31).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Akyildiz, I. F., & Vuran, M. C. (2010). Wireless sensor networks. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gungor, V. C., Sahin, D., Kocak, T., Ergut, S., Buccella, C., Cecati, C., et al. (2013). A survey on smart grid potential applications and communication requirements. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(1), 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wei, D., Lu, Y., Jafari, M., Skare, P. M., & Rohde, K. (2011). Protecting smart grid automation systems against cyber attacks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2(4), 782795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Akyol, B. A., Kirkham, H., Clements, S. L., & Hadley, M. D. (2010). A survey of wireless communications for the electric power system. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khan, I. F., Javed, M. Y., & Arif, F. (2010). Quality assurance of energy aware routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the international conference, computer and automation engineering (Vol. 1, pp. 168–170).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ngai, E. C.-H., Zhou, Y., Lyu, M. R., & Liu, J. (2006). A delay aware reliable event reporting framework for wireless sensor—actuator networks, computer science technical report (pp. 694–707).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bicen, A. O., & Akan, O. B. (2012). Spectrum-aware and cognitive sensor networks for smart grid applications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(5), 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prasad, R., & Liu, C. Y. (1992). Throughput analysis of some mobile packet radio protocols in rician fading channels. IEEE Proceedings I, 139(3), 297–302.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kasahara, H., Hara, S., & Morinaga, N. (1995). Modeling and simulation analysis of indoor packet radio communication systems. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals, J78–A(8), 947–956.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kleinrock, L., & Tobagi, F. A. (1997). Packet switching in radio channels, part 1—Carrier sense multiple access nodes and their throughput-delay characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23, 1400–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tobagi, F. A., & Kleinrock, L. (1997). Packet switching in radio channels: part ii—The hidden terminal problem in carrier sense multiple access and the busy tone solution. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23, 1417–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Prasad, R. (1991). Performance analysis of mobile packet radio networks in real channels with inhibit sense multiple access. IEEE Proceedings I, 138(5), 458–464.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prasad, R. (1991). Throughput analysis of non-persistent inhibit sense multiple access in multipath fading and shadowing channels. European Transactions on Telecommunications and Related Technologies, 2, 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gungor, C., & Hancke, G. P. (2013). Industrial wireless sensor networks: Applications, protocols, and standards. Boca Raton: CRC Press (Taylor Francis Group). (edited book).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringCOMSATS University Islamabad, Wah CampusWah CantonmentPakistan

Personalised recommendations