Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 109, Issue 1, pp 243–256 | Cite as

A Multihoming ACO-MDV Routing for Maximum Power Efficiency in an IoT Environment

  • N. KrishnarajEmail author
  • S. Smys
Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) is the recent technology emerged with new research ideas in the communication arena. With multiple sensors and actuators, it operates on limited energy for numerous applications and it requires major updates for data updating in the network. Mobility, redundancy, and bandwidth are the common factors used to measure the network performance. Data accessing using multihoming mechanism is used to enhance the network performance without any compromise in quality of service. Multi-homing is used to connect one or more devices into a heterogeneous multi-network by using IP address with a best routing strategy. Efficient routing in the multihoming mechanism develops a reliable network and provides a better power efficiency and QoS policy to the users. This proposed research work includes an efficient Ant Colony Optimization On-demand Multipath Distance Vector routing algorithm for enhancing power efficiency in multihoming mechanism based IoT. The proposed model highlights the best routing algorithm in terms of energy consumption and delay that is suitable in multihoming networks.

Keywords

Internet of Things (IoT) Multihoming Ant colony optimization (ACO) Multipath distance vector (MDV) 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Khatouni, A. S., Marsan, M. A., Mellia, M., & Rejaie, R. (2018). Deadline-constrained content upload from multihomed devices: Formulations and algorithms. Journal of Computer Networks, 142, 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Fang, B., & Zhang, H. (2017). Succinct and practical greedy embedding for geometric routing. Journal of Computer Communications, 114, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manisekaran, S. V., & Venkatesan, R. (2016). An analysis of software-defined routing approach for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Computers and Electrical Engineering, 56, 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Yi, B., Fan, Q., & Li, F. (2017). EMGR: Energy-efficient multicast geographic routing in wireless sensor networks. Computer Network, 129, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson, C., & Hollis, S. J. (2011). A deadlock-free routing algorithm for dynamically reconfigurable Networks-on-Chip. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 35, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Güney, E., Aras, N., Altınel, İ. K., & Ersoy, C. (2012). Efficient solution techniques for the integrated coverage, sink location and routing problem in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Computers & Operations Research, 39, 1530–1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Archetti, C., Fernández, E., & Huerta-Muñoz, D. L. (2017). The flexible periodic vehicle routing problem. Journal of Computers and Operations Research, 85, 58–70.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osman, M. S., & Ram, B. (2017). Routing and scheduling on evacuation path networks using centralized hybrid approach. Journal of Computers and Operations Research, 88, 332–339.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paraskevopoulos, D. C., Laporte, G., Repoussis, P. P., & Tarantilis, C. D. (2017). Resource constrained routing and scheduling: Review and research prospects. European Journal of Operational Research, 263, 737–754.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, X., & Da Wu, X. (2011). The balance of routing energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Parallel Distributed Computing, 71, 1024–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mathura, A., Newea, T., Elgenaidia, W., Raoa, M., Doolya, G., & Toal, D. (2017). A secure end-to-end IoT solution. Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 263, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Demircan, S., Aydin, M., & Durduran, S. S. (2011). Finding optimum route of electrical energy transmission line using multi-criteria with Q-learning. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 3477–3482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khayou, H., & Sarakbi, B. (2017). A validation model for non-lexical routing protocols. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 98, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Güney, E., Aras, N., Altınel, İ. K., & Ersoy, C. (2010). Efficient integer programming formulations for optimum sink location and routing in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Journal of Computer Networks, 54, 1805–1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Santos, B. P., Vieira, L. F. M., & Vieira, M. A. M. (2017). CGR: Centrality-based green routing for low-power and lossy networks. Journal of Computer Networks, 129, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jamali, S., Rezaei, L., & Gudakahriz, S. J. (2013). An energy-efficient routing protocol for MANETs: A particle swarm optimization approach. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 11, 803–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agarwal, S., & De, S. (2016). Cognitive multihoming system for energy and cost aware video transmission. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2(3), 316–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, J., Yun, S., Oh, H., Shah Newaz, S. H., Choi, S. G., & Choi, J. K. (2016). Power-efficient rate allocation of wireless access networks with sleep-operation management for multihoming services. Journal of Communications and Networks, 18(4), 619–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yao, J., Zhou, H., Luo, J., Liu, X., & Guan, H. (2015). COMIC: Cost optimization for internet content multihoming. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 26(7), 1851–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuntz, R., Montavont, J., & Noel, T. (2013). Multihoming in IPv6 mobile networks: Progress, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(1), 128–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wallace, T. D., & Shami, A. (2012). A review of multihoming issues using the stream control transmission protocol. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(2), 565–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chuah, S.-P., Chen, Z., & Tan, Y.-P. (2013). Energy minimization for wireless video transmissions with deadline and reliability constraints. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 23(3), 467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiang, Q., Leung, V. C. M., Pourazad, M. T., Tang, H., & Xi, H.-S. (2016). Energy-efficient adaptive transmission of scalable video streaming in cognitive radio communications. IEEE Systems Journal, 10(2), 761–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luo, J., Rao, L., & Liu, X. (2014). Temporal load balancing with service delay guarantees for data center energy cost optimization. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(3), 775–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Al-Turjman, F. M., Imran, M., & Bakhsh, S. T. (2017). Energy efficiency perspectives of femtocells in Internet of Things: Recent advances and challenges. IEEE Access, 5, 26808–26818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee, K., & Hong, J. P. (2017). Power control for energy efficient D2D communication in heterogeneous networks with eavesdropper. IEEE Communications Letters, 21(11), 2536–2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaur, N., & Sood, S. K. (2017). An energy-efficient architecture for the Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Systems Journal, 11(2), 796–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyDr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and TechnologyPollachiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringRVS Technical CampusCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations