Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Review on Training and Blind Equalization Algorithms for Wireless Communications

Abstract

Every wireless communication system comes with an innate problem of multipath propagation, which results in spreading the resultant symbols on a time scale and thus causes the symbols to overlap and end up in Inter-symbol Interference (ISI). The overall signal is distorted and the receiver is unable to recover the original signal. ISI from the signal must be removed and the signal must be brought back to its original form as it was sent or as close to it as possible; and process of equalization is used in all wireless communication system for this purpose. Two types of equalization processes are common in modern wireless communication systems. Training based equalization requires the sender block of communication system to constantly send a pilot/training signal in order to update the receiver about the original signal. The receiver removes the ISI and extracts the unadulterated signal. The second equalization process is called blind equalization and it does not require any pilot signal. The receiver only needs to know the type of constellation scheme used in modulation and then the original signal is extracted based on that information. In this paper we have thoroughly reviewed four equalization algorithms, two from each type of equalization for 16-QAM constellation and 64-QAM constellation. We came up with constellation diagrams for each equalization algorithm and comparison of BER, residual ISI and MSE for 16-QAM and 64-QAM is done through simulations. In case of LMS and RLS algorithm for 16 QAM, the performance of RLS gets slightly better than LMS at 6 dB, however, at around 12–14 dB and onwards the BER of RLS leads and there is a significantly better BER than LMS. In future, we will compare these algorithms in order to figure out the best algorithms for the current and upcoming 5G and 6G communication technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

References

  1. 1.

    Zhang, H., Shi, Y., & Mehr, A. S. (2012). Robust equalisation for inter symbol interference communication channels. IET Signal Processing, 6(2), 73–78.

  2. 2.

    Chung, G. C., Thwin, S. S., & Alias, M. Y. (2013). Statistical distribution of UWB signals in the presence of inter-symbol interference. In 2013 IEEE conference on sustainable utilization and development in engineering and technology (CSUDET) (pp. 60–62). IEEE.

  3. 3.

    Chang, W., & Jung, B. C. (2014). Optimal transmission strategy without capacity loss at a primary user in cognitive radio networks over inter-symbol interference channels. IEEE Communications Letters, 18(3), 411–414.

  4. 4.

    Mishra, G., & Rai, M. (2018). A comparative study on characteristics and properties of adaptive algorithms applied to noise cancellation techniques. In 2018 international conference on computational and characterization techniques in engineering & sciences (CCTES) (pp. 258–261). IEEE.

  5. 5.

    Talluri, G. R., & Baghini, M. S. (2019). A novel dual loop adaptive equalizer based on spectrum balancing technique. Microelectronics Journal, 87, 127–135.

  6. 6.

    Moshirian, S., Ghadami, S., & Havaei, M. (2012). Blind channel equalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1208.2205.

  7. 7.

    Tong, F., Benson, B., Li, Y., & Kastner, R. (2010). Channel equalization based on data reuse LMS algorithm for shallow water acoustic communication. In 2010 IEEE international conference on sensor networks, ubiquitous, and trustworthy computing (SUTC) (pp. 95–98). IEEE.

  8. 8.

    Akaneme, E. S. A., & Onoh, G. N. (2015). Algorithms for evaluating adaptive equalization in wireless communication systems. European Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 54–61.

  9. 9.

    Ding, Y., Davidson, T. N., Luo, Z. Q., & Wong, K. M. (2003). Minimum BER block precoders for zero-forcing equalization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51(9), 2410–2423.

  10. 10.

    Kyritsi, P., Stoica, P., Papanicolaou, G., Eggers, P., & Oprea, A. (2005). Time reversal and zero-forcing equalization for fixed wireless access channels. In Conference record of the thirty-ninth Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers (pp. 1297–1301).

  11. 11.

    Wahab, A., Ahmed, S., Javed, N., & Khan, A. (2016). Performance analysis of training and blind equalization algorithms for wireless communication using 64-QAM. In Proceedings of 2nd international multi-disciplinary conference (Vol. 19, p. 20).

  12. 12.

    Arivukkarasu, S., & Malar, R. (2015). Multi modulus blind equalizations for quadrature amplitude modulation. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 3(3), 2301–2305.

  13. 13.

    Mendes Filho, J., Silva, M. T. M., & Miranda, M. D. (2011). A family of algorithms for blind equalization of QAM signals. In ICASSP (pp. 3388–3391).

  14. 14.

    Geng, Y., Zhang, L., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, N., & Wu, J. (2016). Research on ant colony algorithm optimization neural network weights blind equalization algorithm. International Journal of Security and its Applications, 10(2), 95–104.

  15. 15.

    Suthendran, K., & Arivoli, T. (2014). Performance comparison of blind equalization algorithms for wireless communication. International Journal of Computer Applications, 85(13), 1–6.

  16. 16.

    Ram Babu, T., & Kumar, P. R. (2010). Blind equalization using constant modulus algorithm and multi-modulus algorithm in wireless communication systems. International Journal of Computer Applications, 1(3), 50–55.

  17. 17.

    Kavitha, V., & Sharma, V. (2005). Comparison of training, blind and semi blind equalizers in MIMO fading systems using capacity as measure. In IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 2005. Proceedings (ICASSP’05) (Vol. 3, pp. iii–589). IEEE.

  18. 18.

    Benvenuto, N., Ciccotosto, S., & Tomasin, S. (2015). Iterative block fractionally spaced nonlinear equalization for wideband channels. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 4(5), 489–492.

  19. 19.

    Li, H., Chen, X., Huang, B., Tang, D., & Chen, H. (2014). High bandwidth visible light communications based on a post-equalization circuit. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 26(2), 119–122.

  20. 20.

    Wang, Y., Li, R., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2014). 3.25-Gbps visible light communication system based on single carrier frequency domain equalization utilizing an RGB LED. In Optical fiber communication conference (pp. Th1F-1). Optical Society of America.

  21. 21.

    Chapin, J., & Lehr, W. (2011). Mobile broadband growth, spectrum scarcity, and sustainable competition. In TPRC.

  22. 22.

    Proakis, J. G. (2001). Intersymbol interference in digital communication systems. Hoboken: Wiley.

  23. 23.

    Jalali, S. (2012). Wireless channel equalization in digital communication systems. CGU theses & dissertations. Paper 42. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgu_etd/42.

  24. 24.

    Kavitha, V., & Sharma, V. (2005). Comparison of training, blind and semi blind equalizers in MIMO fading systems using capacity as measure. In IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 2005. Proceedings (ICASSP’05) (Vol. 3, pp. iii–589). IEEE.

  25. 25.

    Silva, N. A., & Pinto, A. N. (2017). Role of amplifiers gain on the achievable information rate of M-ary PSK and QAM constellations. Optics Communications, 383, 215–222.

  26. 26.

    Malik, G., & Sappal, A. S. (2011). Adaptive equalization algorithms: An overview. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2(3), 63–67.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Yousaf Khan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, S., Khan, Y. & Wahab, A. A Review on Training and Blind Equalization Algorithms for Wireless Communications. Wireless Pers Commun 108, 1759–1783 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06495-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Inter-symbol Interference
  • Communication system
  • Equalization
  • QAM