Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Deep Sea Exploration Recovery and Transport [DESERT] Vehicle and its Modes of Communication


Man has explored less than 5% of three-fourths of the water on Earth. This is mostly due to lack of cheap and effective under-water transportation. Submarines and other deep sea robots, exploration devices and submersible modules have a wide range of problems and have limited our exploration capabilities and reach. After many recent disasters requiring a wide range of under water rescue operations, it has become clear that we do not possess the means to efficient and effective under water travel. The Deep Sea Exploration Recovery and Transport (DESERT) vehicle is an attempt to bridge that gap. Modeled on sharks, the fastest and most aerodynamic creatures in the seas, the underwater vehicle takes cues from nature and uses to its advantage. Deep and long ranged underwater travel and communication, the various possible forms of communication, and an engine and propeller system which uses sea water as a fuel (Sengupta and Sengupta in Int J Manag Appl Sci 3(8):78–81, 2015) are the main points of discussion in this paper. This study mainly focuses on the theoretical framework and design of DESERT, an undersea vehicle and the possible outline to do so. The ideas behind its mode of communication under-water have also been put forward and explored. Using new technological advancements, a first-of-its-kind model has been put forward with an inclination towards making it feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5


  1. 1.

    Sengupta, P., & Sengupta, A. (2015). Sea water immersed propulsion engine. International Journal of Applied Management Science, 3(8), 78–81.

  2. 2.

    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

  3. 3.

    AUV System Timeline.

  4. 4.

    Model Rocket Aerodynamics, Ramblin’ Rocket Club, Georgia Tech.

  5. 5.

    Park, Y. J., Huh, T. M., Park, D., & Cho, K. J. (2014). Design of a variable-stiffness flapping mechanism for maximizing the thrust of a bio-inspired underwater robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 9(036002), 1–12.

  6. 6.

    Hu, T., Shen, L., Lin, L., & Xu, H. (2009). Biological inspirations, kinematics modeling, mechanism design and experiments on an undulating robotic fin inspired by Gymnarchus niloticus. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 44(3), 633–645.

  7. 7.

    Bodiyono, A. (2009). Advances in unmanned underwater technologies: Modeling, control and guidance perspectives. Indian Journal of Marine Science, 38(3), 282–295.

  8. 8.

    Furno, Technology, Dead Reckoning.

  9. 9.

    Kaushal, H., & Kaddoum, G. (2016). Underwater optical wireless communication. IEEE. Access, 4, 1518–1547.

  10. 10.

    Milner, A., & Jones, S. (2016). Design, testing, analysis, and material properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymers. Terre Haute: Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Research Publications, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.

  11. 11.

    Lendlein, A., & Langer, R. (2002). Biodegradable, elastic shape-memory polymers for potential biomedical applications. Science, 296(5573), 1673–1676.

  12. 12.

    Jamal, M., Kadam, S. S., Xiao, R., Jivan, F., Onn, T. M., Fernandes, R., et al. (2013). Bio-origami hydrogel scaffolds composed of photocrosslinked PEG bilayers. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2(8), 1142–1150.

  13. 13.

    Alexander, S., Xiao, R., & Nguyen, T. D. (2014). Modeling the thermoviscoelastic properties and recovery behavior of shape memory polymer composites. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 81(4), 041003.

  14. 14.

    Yin, J., Li, X., Jin, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J., & Guo, W. (2014). Generating electricity by moving a droplet of ionic liquid along graphene. Nature Nanotechnology, 9, 378–383.

  15. 15.

    Sumana, B. G., Sagar, H. V., Krishna, M., & Rajkumar, G. R. (2014). Investigation of burst pressure on carbon/glass fiber reinforced polymer metal tube for high pressure applications. Procedia Materials Science, 5, 535–539.

  16. 16.

    Liang, B., Cui, J., & Zhang, L. (2011). Research on birds flapping-wing bionic mechanism. Mechanical Engineering Research, 1(1), 38.

  17. 17.

    Wilga, C. A. D., & Lauder, G. V. (2004). Biomechanics of locomotion in sharks, rays, and chimeras. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC.

  18. 18.

    Whitcomb, L. L., Yoerger, D. R., Singh, H. (1999). Combined doppler/LBL based navigation of underwater vehicles. In 11th international symposium on unmanned untethered submersible technology (UUST99) (August 22-25, 1999). Durham, New Hampshire, USA: New England Centre

  19. 19.

    Brumley, B. H., Cabrera, R. G., Deines, K. L., & Terray, E. A. (1991). Performance of a broad-band acoustic Doppler current profiler. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 16(4), 402–407.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Pavel Sengupta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sengupta, P., Sengupta, A. Deep Sea Exploration Recovery and Transport [DESERT] Vehicle and its Modes of Communication. Wireless Pers Commun 108, 1069–1077 (2019).

Download citation


  • Bio-inspired
  • Dead reckoning
  • Hydrophones
  • Smart memory polymers
  • UOWC