Advertisement

A Model Based Poisson Point Process for Downlink Cellular Networks Using Joint Scheduling

  • Sinh Cong LamEmail author
  • Kumbesan Sandrasegaran
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes a model based on a random cellular network to analyse performance of Joint Scheduling in which a typical user measures signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) on different resource blocks from K nearest BSs in order to find out the BS with the highest SINR to establish communication. The paper derives the general form of average coverage probability of a typical user in the case of \(K>2\) and its close-form expression in the case of \(K=2\). The analytical results which are verified by Monte Carlo simulation indicates that (1) using the Joint Scheduling can improve the user’s performance up to \(34.88 \%\) in the case of the path loss exponent \(\alpha = 3\); (2) the effect of the density of BSs on the user association probability is infinitesimal.

Keywords

Poisson point process Joint scheduling Coverage probability 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    3GPP TR 36.819 V11.1.0. (2011). Coordinated multi-point operation for LTE physical layer aspects.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jo, H.-S., Sang, Y. J., Xia, P., & Andrews, J. (2012). Heterogeneous cellular networks with flexible cell association: A comprehensive downlink SINR analysis. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 11(10), 3484–3495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh, S., Dhillon, H. S., & Andrews, J. G. (2013). Offloading in heterogeneous networks: Modeling, analysis, and design insights. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(5), 2484–2497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bassoy, S., Farooq, H., Imran, M. A., & Imran, A. (2017). Coordinated multi-point clustering schemes: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 99, 1–1.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ElSawy, H., Hossain, E., & Haenggi, M. (2013). Stochastic geometry for modeling, analysis, and design of multi-tier and cognitive cellular wireless networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15(3), 996–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jung, S. Y., Lee, H. K., & Kim, S. L. (2013). Worst-case user analysis in Poisson Voronoi cells. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(8), 1580–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moltchanov, D. (2012). Survey paper: Distance distributions in random networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(6), 1146–1166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., & Ganti, R. K. (2010). A new tractable model for cellular coverage. In 2010 48th Annual Allerton conference on communication, control, and computing (Allerton) (pp. 1204–1211).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lam, S. C., Sandrasegaran, K., & Ghosal, P. (2017). Performance analysis of frequency reuse for PPP networks in composite Rayleigh-lognormal fading channel. Wireless Personal Communications, 96, 989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VietNam National University - Hanoi, University of Engineering and TechnologyHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations