Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 151–177 | Cite as

Enabling Generic Wireless Coexistence Through Technology-Agnostic Dynamic Spectrum Access

  • Irfan JabandžićEmail author
  • Spilios Giannoulis
  • Ingrid Moerman
Article
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

Every year that passes, new standardized and proprietary wireless communication technologies are introduced in the market that seeks to find its place within the already highly congested spectrum. Regulation bodies all around the globe are struggling to keep up with the continuously increasing demand for new bands to offer to specific technologies, some of them requiring by design an exclusive frequency band in order to operate efficiently. Even wireless bands offered for public or scientific usage like the ISM bands are becoming the natural habitat of multiple wireless technologies that seek to use or “abuse” them in order to provide even more bandwidth to their offered applications. Wireless research teams targeting heterogeneous wireless communication coexistence are developing techniques for enabling one-to-one coexistence between various wireless technologies. Can such an exhaustive approach be the solution for N wireless technologies that wish to operate in the same band? We believe that a one-to-one approach is inefficient and cannot lead to a generic coexistence paradigm, applicable to every existing or new wireless communication technology that will arise in the future. Can another approach provide a more generic solution in terms of frequency reuse and coexistence compared to the one-dimensional frequency separation approach commonly used in commercial deployments today. Can such a generic approach provide a simple and easily adoptable coexistence model for existing technologies? In this paper we present a new generic medium sharing model that solves the huge coexistence problems observed today in a simple and efficient way. Our approach is technology-agnostic and compatible with all existing wireless communication technologies and also has the capability to support emerging ones with minimum overhead.

Keywords

Spectrum management Dynamic spectrum allocation Heterogeneous networks coexistence Spectrum sharing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by FWO-SB Project No 140048 SAMURAI (Software Architecture and Modules for Unified RAdIo control), the FWO EOS Project No 30452698 MUSE-WINET (MUlti-SErvice WIreless NETwork) and the UGent-BOF-GOA project Disposable and biodegradable wireless networks for extreme conditions.

References

  1. 1.
    Lien, S.-Y., Chen, K.-C., & Lin, Y. (2011). Toward ubiquitous massive accesses in 3GPP machine-to-machine communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(4), 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, K.-C., & Lien, S.-Y. (2014). Machine-to-machine communications: Technologies and challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 18, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lo, A., Yee, L., & Jacobsson, M. (2013). A cellular-centric service architecture for machine-to-machine (M2M) communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 20(5), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andrews, J. G., et al. (2014). What will 5G be? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6), 1065–1082.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, S., & Zhao, J. (2014). The requirements, challenges, and technologies for 5G of terrestrial mobile telecommunication. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(5), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2016–2021, Cisco, February 2017.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spectrum policy task force report. Federal Communications Commission, November 2002. Retrieved August 20 2018. Available at https://www.fcc.gov/document/spectrum-policy-task-force.
  8. 8.
    Cabric, D. B., & Brodersen, R. W. (2007). Cognitive radios: System design perspective, technical report no. UCB/EECS-2007-156.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Withers, D. (1999). Radio spectrum management (2nd ed.). London: The Institution of Electrical Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feasibility study on licensed-assisted access to unlicensed spectrum, 3GPP, 2015. Retrieved August 15 2018. Available at www.3gpp.org.
  11. 11.
    New work item on licensed-assisted access to unlicensed spectrum, 3GPP, 2015. Retrieved August 15 2018. Available at www.3gpp.org.
  12. 12.
    Overview of 3GPP release 13, 3GPP, 2015. Retrieved August 15 2018. Available at http://www.3gpp.org/release-13.
  13. 13.
    The book of visions 2001—visions of a wireless world. Wireless World Research Forum, December 2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bi, Q., Zysman, G. I., & Menkes, H. (2001). Wireless mobile communications at the start of the 21st century. IEEE Communications Magazine, 39(1), 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu, W. W. (2000). Compact multidimensional broadband wireless: The convergence of wireless mobile and access. IEEE Communications Magazine, 38(11), 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zysman, G. I., et al. (2000). Technology evolution for mobile and personal communications. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 5(1), 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haardt, M., & Mohr, W. (2000). The complete solution for third generation wireless communications: Two modes on air, one winning strategy. IEEE Personal Communications, 7(6), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    RSPG opinion on licensed shared access, RSPG13-538. Radio Spectrum Policy Group, November 2013.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ECC report 205, licensed shared access (LSA), ECC, February 2014.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ayeni, A. A., Faruk, N., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Okanlawon, R. A., & Adediran, Y. A. (2015). Spatial spectrum utilization efficiency metric for spectrum sharing system. International Journal of Digital Information and Wireless Communications, 5(1), 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leaves, P., Moessner, K., Tafazolli, R., Grandblaise, D., Bourse, D., Tonjes, R., et al. (2004). Dynamic spectrum allocation in composite reconfigurable wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(5), 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thilakawardana, D., Moessner, K., & Tafazolli, R. (2008). Darwinian approach for dynamic spectrum allocation in next generation systems. IET Communications, 2(6), 827–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raman, C., Yates, R. D., & Mandayam, N. B. (2005). Scheduling variable rate links via a spectrum server. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 110–118).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zekavat, S. A., & Li, X. (2005). User-central wireless system: Ultimate dynamic channel allocation. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 82–87).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cao, L., & Zheng, H. (2005). Distributed spectrum allocation via local bargaining. In Proceedings IEEE sensor and Ad Hoc communications and networks (SECON) (pp. 475–486).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huang, J., Berry, R. A., & Honig, M. L. (2005). Spectrum sharing with distributed interference compensation. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 88–93).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ma, L., Han, X., & Shen, C.-C. (2005). Dynamic open spectrum sharing MAC protocol for wireless ad hoc network. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 203–213).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sankaranarayanan, S., Papadimitratos, P., Mishra, A., & Hershey, S. (2005). A bandwidth sharing approach to improve licensed spectrum utilization. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 279–288).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kibria, M. G., Villardi, G. P., Ishizu, K., Kojima, F., & Yano, H. (2016). Resource allocation in shared spectrum access communications for operators with diverse service requirements. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2016, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luo, J., Eichinger, J., Zhao, Z., & Schulz, E. (2014). Multi-carrier waveform based flexible inter-operator spectrum sharing for 5G systems. In 2014 IEEE international symposium on dynamic spectrum access networks (DYSPAN).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brik, V., Rozner, E., Banerjee, S., & Bahl, P. (2005). DSAP: A protocol for coordinated spectrum access. In Proceedings IEEE DySPAN (pp. 611–614).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kamakaris, T., Buddhikot, M. M., & Iyer, R. (2005). A case for coordinated dynamic spectrum access in cellular networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN 2005.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buddhikot, M. M., Kolodzy, P., Miller, S., Ryan, K., & Evans, J. (2005). DIMSUMNet: New directions in wireless networking using coordinated dynamic spectrum access. In Sixth IEEE international symposium on a world of wireless mobile and multimedia networks.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhou, H., Liu, B., Hou, F., Zhang, N., Gui, L., Chen, J., et al. (2015). Database-assisted dynamic spectrum access with QoS guarantees: A double-phase auction approach. China Communications, 12(1), 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Murty, R., Chandra, R., Moscibroda, T., & Bahl, P. (2011). SenseLess: A database-driven white spaces network. In 2011 IEEE international symposium on dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dai, Y., Wu, J., & Du, X. (2018). Hierarchical and hybrid: Mobility-compatible database-assisted framework for dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 1, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mueck, M. D., Srikanteswara, S., & Badic, B. (2015). Spectrum sharing: Licensed shared access (LSA) and spectrum access systems (SAS). Santa Clara: Intel.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Berezdivin, R., Breinig, R., & Topp, R. (2002). Next-generation wireless communications concepts and technologies. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(3), 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Peng, C., Zheng, H., & Zhao, B. Y. (2006). Utilization and fairness in spectrum assignment for opportunistic spectrum access. Mobile Networks and Applications, 11(4), 555–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W.-Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006). NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 50(13), 2127–2159.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Middleton, G., Hooli, K., Tolli, A., & Lilleberg, J. (2006). Inter-operator spectrum sharing in a broadband cellular network. In 2006 IEEE ninth international symposium on spread spectrum techniques and applications.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Xu, L., Tonjes, R., Paila, T., Hansmann, W., Frank, M., & Albrecht, M. (2000). DRiVE-ing to the internet: Dynamic radio for ip services in vehicular environments. In Proceedings of the 25th annual IEEE conference on local computer networks (pp. 281–289).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Grandblaise, D., Bourse, D., Moessner, K., & Leaves, P. (2002). Dynamic spectrum allocation (DSA) and reconfigurability. In Proceedings of the software-defined radio (SDR) forum.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jing, X., & Raychaudhuri, D. (2005). Spectrum co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a networks using CSCC etiquette protocol. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN 2005 (pp. 243–250).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhao, J., Zheng, H., & Yang, G.-H. (2005). Distributed coordination in dynamic spectrum allocation networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN 2005.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Seidenberg, P., Lott, M. (1998). Analysis of the inter-system interference with respect to the required minimum frequency separation. In 4th Cost259 meeting.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ahmad, A., Ahmad, S., Rehmani, M. H., & Hassan, N. U. (2015). A survey on radio resource allocation in cognitive radio sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(2), 888–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tsiropoulos, G. I., Dobre, O. A., Ahmed, M. H., & Baddour, K. E. (2014). Radio resource allocation techniques for efficient spectrum access in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(1), 824–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Alias, D. M., & Ragesh, G. K. (2016). Cognitive radio networks: A survey. In 2016 International conference on wireless communications, signal processing and networking (WiSPNET) (pp. 1981–1986).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDLab, Department of Information TechnologyGhent University - imecGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations