Advertisement

Adaptive Carrier Aggregation with Differentiating Cloud Services for Maximizing Radio Resource Efficiency and Reward Toward 5G Cellular Network

  • Ben-Jye ChangEmail author
  • Shih-Ting Feng
  • Kai-Peng Jhuang
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Toward 5G cellular network, to achieve an extremely high data rate and Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communication by using a limited radio frequency spectrum bands becomes a big challenge. 3GPP LTE-A/LTE-A Pro thus specifies the technologies of Carrier Aggregation (CA) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) to increase the frequency spectrum efficiency and to dynamically allocate the virtualized network component for different classes of requests, respectively. CA can aggregate multiple contiguous or non-contiguous Component Carriers (CCs) and to improve frequency spectrum utilization and signal quality. NFV can dynamically allocate network (virtualized) resource for different classes of services, e.g., human-driven Cloud Computing, machine-driven Internet of Vehicles (IoVs) (e.g., Autonomous Self Driving Vehicle) and sensing-based Internet of Things (IoTs), etc. However, different SINRs of different frequency spectrum bands suffer from the exiting radio nature of CCs. The CA effect and system capacity are thus limited obviously. Additionally, in CC accesses via IoV/IoT, human-driven and machine-driven types communications exhibit different arrival requests and traffic characteristics. Various QoS requirements and traffic distributions of Human and Machine transmissions are certainly different. This paper thus proposes the Cross-Layer scheduling with CC Aggregation (CLCA) toward 5G. CLCA consists of three mechanisms: (1) Markov Decision Process-based cost reward Packet Selection (MDP-PS), (2) Adaptive Packet Scheduling (APS) and (3) Adaptive Component Carrier scheduling (ACC). Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed CLCA approach outperform the compared approaches in system capacity, network reward and packet failure rate.

Keywords

Toward 5G LTE-A Pro Carrier Aggregation (CA) Carrier Component IoV IoT Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Radio resource allocation 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, ROC, under Grant MOST-105-2221-E-224-031-MY2.

References

  1. 1.
    Xiao, Y., Han, Z., Yuen, C., & DaSilva, L. (2016). Carrier aggregation between operators in next generation cellular networks: A stable roommate market. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(1), 633–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AbdelFadeel, K., Elsayed, K., Digham, F., & Khattab, A. (2016). Carrier aggregation-based dynamic spectrum access framework for LTE-A primary operators. IET Communications, 10(13), 1596–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, C., Wei, H., & Chen, W. (2016). Resource block allocation with carrier-aggregation: A strategy-proof auction design. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 15(12), 3142–3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jaber, M., Imran, M., Tafazolli, R., & Tukmanov, A. (2016). 5G backhaul challenges and emerging research directions: A survey. IEEE Access, 4, 1743–1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    TS 23.107 Version 14.0.0. (2017). Quality of Service (QoS) concept and architecture. 3GPP. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vilgelm, M., Gursu, H., Kellerer, W., & Reisslein, M. (2017). LATMAPA: Load-adaptive throughput-maximizing preamble allocation for prioritization in 5G random access. IEEE Access, 5, 1103–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koseoglu, M. (2017). Pricing-based load control of M2M traffic for the LTE-A random access channel. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 65(3), 1353–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foddis, G., Garroppo, R., Giordano, S., Procissi, G., Roma, S., & Topazzi, S. (2016). Modeling RACH arrivals and collisions for human-type communication. IEEE Communications Letter, 20(7), 1417–1420.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kubota, H., Teramae, J.-N., & Wakamiya, N. (2017). An efficient sleep/wake-up protocol for localization in impulse wireless sensor networks. In Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Capozzi, F., Piro, G., Grieco, L. A., Bogia, G., & Camarda, P. (2012). Downlink packet scheduling in LTE cellular network: Key design issue and a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(2), 678–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    TR 36.912 Version 14.0.0. (2017). Feasibility study for further advancements for E-UTRA (LTE-Advanced). 3GPP.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, C.-H., Wei, H.-Y., & Chen, W.-T. (2016). Resource block allocation with carrier-aggregation: A strategy-proof auction design. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 15(12), 3142–3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shajaiah, H., Abdelhadi, A., & Clancy, T. C. (2016). Towards an application-aware resource scheduling with carrier aggregation in cellular systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 20(1), 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rostami, S., Arshad, K., & Rapajic, P. (2018). Optimum radio resource management in carrier aggregation based LTE-advanced systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(1), 580–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Qu, W., Fu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2017). A novel UE preference based component carrier selection algorithm in LTE-advanced. In Vehicular technology conference (VTC-Fall) (pp. 24–27).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Foukalas, F., & Tsiftsis, T. A. (2018). Energy efficient power allocation for carrier aggregation in heterogeneous networks: Partial feedback and circuit power consumption. IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, 2(3), 623–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen, L., Chen, W.-W., Zhang, X., & Yang, D.-C. (2009). Analysis and simulation for spectrum aggregation in LTE-advanced system. In IEEE vehicular technology conference fall (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, L., Liu, F., Huang, L., & Wang, W.-B. (2010). Traffic load balance methods in the LTE-advanced system with carrier aggregation. In International conference on communications, circuits and systems (ICCCAS) (pp. 63–67).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li, F., Ren, P.-Y., & Du, Q.-H. (2012). Joint packet scheduling and subcarrier assignment for video communications over downlink OFDMA systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(6), 2753–2767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jiang, Y., Lau, F. C. M., Ho, I. W.-H., & Gong, Y. (2016). Resource allocation for multiuser OFDMA hybrid full/half-duplex relaying systems with direct links. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(8), 6101–6118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Piro, G., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., Fortuna, R., & Camarda, P. (2011). Two-level downlink scheduling for real-time multimedia services in LTE networks. IEEE Transations on Multimedia, 13(5), 1052–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Srinivasa Rao, K., & Roopa Vathi, N. (2017). Opportunistic subcarrier allocation scheme for FFR-aided LTE networks. Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICEI), 919–923.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alaa, Y., ElAttar, H. M., Digham, F., Afify, L. H., & Elbadawy, H. (2017). LTE dynamic scheduling scheme for massive M2M and H2H communication. In Ubiquitous computing, electronics and mobile communication conference (UEMCON) (pp. 478–482).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gau, R.-H., & Chen, C.-H. (2016). Signal-centric predictive medium access control for M2M communications. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(4), 2656–2668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Verma, P. K., Verma, R., Prakash, A., Tripathi, R., & Naik, K. (2015). A novel scalable hybrid-MAC protocol for densely deployed M2M networks. Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN), 50–55.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bilal, K., Erbad, A., & Hefeeda, M. (2017). Crowdsourced multi-view live video streaming using cloud computing. IEEE Access, 5, 12635–12647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alsarhan, A., Itradat, A., Al-Dubai, A. Y., Zomaya, A. Y., & Min, G. (2018). Adaptive resource allocation and provisioning in multi-service cloud environments. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 29(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khoshkholghi, M. A., Derahman, M. N., Abdullah, A., Subramaniam, S., & Othman, M. (2017). Energy-efficient algorithms for dynamic virtual machine consolidation in cloud data centers. IEEE Access, 15, 10709–10722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moghaddam, F. F., Wieder, P., & Yahyapour, R. (2017). A policy-based identity management schema for managing accesses in clouds. In International conference on the network of the future (NOF) (pp. 91–98).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Portaluri, G., Adami, D., Gabbrielli, A., Giordano, S., & Pagano, M. (2017). Power consumption-aware virtual machine placement in cloud data center. IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, 1(4), 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Alhumaima, R. S., & Al-Raweshidy, H. S. (2017). Modelling the power consumption and trade-offs of virtualised cloud radio access networks. IET Communications, 1(7), 1158–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    TR 36.942 Version 14.0.0. (2017). Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); radio frequency (RF) system scenarios (Release 14). 3GPP.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Katsha, M. Z. A., & Ramli, H. A. M. (2016). Development of a novel component carrier selection algorithm in Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) with Carrier Aggregation. IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)., 2016, 13–18.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    TS 36.213 Version 14.2.0. (2017). Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); physical layer procedures. 3GPP. Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    3GPP TR 36.814 V9.2.0. (2017). Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA). Further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects (Release 9). 3GPP.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sivaraj, R., Pande, A., Zeng, K., Govindan, K., & Mohapatra, P., (2012). Edge-prioritized channel-and Traffic-aware uplink Carrier aggregation in LTE-advanced systems. In IEEE international symposium on a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks (pp. 1–9).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chang, B.-J., & Hwang, R.-H. (2004). Performance analysis for hierarchical multirate loss networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 12(1), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dardouri, S., & Bouallegue, R. (2015). Comparative study of downlink packet scheduling for LTE networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 82(3), 1405–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nwawelu, U. N., Ani, C. I., & Ahaneku, M. A. (2017). Comparative analysis of the performance of resource allocation algorithms in long term evolution networks. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 36(1), 163–171.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sandrasegaran, K., Ramli, H. A. M., & Basukala, R. (2010). Delay-prioritized scheduling (DPS) for real time traffic in 3GPP LTE System. In 2010 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 1–6)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li, H., Guo, Q., Fang, L., & Huang, D. (2012). Fairness and capacity analysis of opportunistic feedback protocol with proportional fair or maximum throughput scheduling. In IEEE international conference on wireless communications & signal processing (WCSP) (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Institute of Communications and Radio-Frequency Engineering. (2016). Vienna LTE simulators system level simulator documentation, v1.7r1119. Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Institute of Communications and Radio-Frequency Engineering. (2016). Vienna simulators LTE-A downlink system level simulator documentation, v1.9 Q2-2016. Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shajaiah, H., Abdelhadi, A., & Clancy, T. (2016). Towards an application-aware resource scheduling with carrier aggregation in cellular systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 20(1), 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hachtel, G. D., Macii, E., Pardo, A., & Somenzi, F. (1993). Markovian analysis of large finite state machines. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 15(12), 1479–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringNational Yunlin University of Science and TechnologyYulinTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations