Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 103, Issue 3, pp 2455–2473 | Cite as

A New Energy Efficient Clustering Protocol for a Novel Concentric Circular Wireless Sensor Network

  • A. ChithraEmail author
  • R. Shantha Selva Kumari
Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Researchers concentrate on big data. Wireless sensor network is one of the sources of big data. Wireless sensor network has hundreds of sensor nodes with limited energy and computational capability. Clustering is a technique used to reduce the energy expended and extend the network lifetime. Generally, nodes are deployed in a square network field. The nodes at the edges of the network have to transmit longer distance to the sink than the nodes at the sides. This depletes the node energy and reduces the network lifetime. Our proposed work Efficient Energy Heterogeneous Circular field Clustering Protocol (EEHCCP), deploys two tier energy heterogeneity nodes: normal and advance nodes in different zones of concentric circular network field. A hybrid direct and clustered communication in a circular network field has increased the network lifetime and throughput of the sensor network. The network lifetime and throughput of EEHCCP is better than SEP, DEEC and EDEEC. Also, performance metric of heterogeneous clustered EEHCCP is compared with Efficient Energy Homogeneous Circular field Protocol with no clustering.

Keywords

Clustering protocol Circular network field Energy heterogeneity Network lifetime Throughput Wireless sensor network 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Guiloufi, A. B. F., Nasri, N., & Kachouri, A. (2015). An energy-efficient unequal clustering algorithm using ‘Sierpinski triangle’ for WSNs. Wireless Personal Communications.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-3137-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saeidmanesh, M., Haji Mohammadi, M., & Movaghar, A. (2009). Energy and distance based clustering: An energy efficient clustering method for WSNs. World Acadamy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 55, 555.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saravanakumar, R., Susila, S. G., & Raja, J. (2011). Energy efficient homogeneous and heterogeneous system for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 17, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar, N., Tyagi, S., & Deng, D.-J. (2014). LA-EEHSC: Learning automata-based energy efficient heterogeneous selective clustering for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications., 46, 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishra, N. K., Jain, V., & Sahu, S. (2013). Survey on recent clustering algorithms in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(4), 1.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katiyar, V., Chand, N., & Soni, S. (2010). Clustering algorithms for heterogeneous wireless sensor network: A survey. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 1(2), 273.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, S. K., Singh, M. P., & Singh, D. K. (2010). Applications, classifications, and selections of energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Sciences and Technologies, 1(2), 085–095.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sheikhpour, R., Jabbehdari, S., & Khadem-Zadeh, A. (2011). Comparison of energy efficient clustering protocols in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 36, 27.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yarvis, M., Kushalnagar, N., Singh, H., Rangarajan, A., Liu, Y., & Singh, S. (2005). Exploiting heterogeneity in sensor networks. In IEEE INFOCOM.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smaragdakis, G., & Matta, I. (2010). SEP: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks (pp. 1–11). Boston: Boston University.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heinzelman, W. B., & Chandrakasan, A. P. (2002). An application specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bala, M., & Awasthi, L. (2012). Proficient D-SEP protocol with heterogeneity for maximizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 7, 1–15.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faisal, S., Javaid, N., Javaid, A., Khan, M. A., Bouk, S. H., & Khan, Z. A. (2013). Z-SEP: Zonal-stable election protocol for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research., 3(5), 132–139.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qing, L., Zhu, M., & Wang, M. (2006). Design of a distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29(12), 2230–2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saini, P., & Ajay, S. K. (2010). E-DEEC-enhanced distributed energy efficient clustering scheme for heterogeneous WSN. In 1st international conference on parallel, distributed and grid computing (PDGC) (pp. 205–210).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chithra, A., & Shantha Selva Kumari, R. (2017). A novel 3-level energy heterogeneity clustering protocol with hybrid routing for a concentric circular wireless sensor network.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ECE DepartmentK.L.N.C.I.T.Sivagangai Dt.India
  2. 2.ECE DepartmentMepco Schlenk Engineering CollegeSivakasiIndia

Personalised recommendations