Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 103, Issue 3, pp 2197–2212 | Cite as

Closed-Form Outage Probability Expressions for Multihop Cognitive Radio Network with Best Path Selection Schemes in RF Energy Harvesting Environment

  • Soumen MondalEmail author
  • Sanjay Dhar Roy
  • Sumit Kundu
Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a comparative study of parallel best path selection (PBPS) and immediate best path selection IBPS in terms of outage probability and throughput has been done in a multi hop cognitive radio network. The closed form expressions for the outage probability of secondary network in PBPS protocol as well as IBPS protocol in multihop scenario have been derived. We also find the impact of the number of parallel paths in multihop scenario on the outage probability and throughput of secondary network. The performance of PBPS scheme is compared with IBPS scheme. An optimum value of initial harvesting time for secondary nodes \((\tau )\) to achieve maximum throughput is also found for both the path selection schemes.

Keywords

Energy harvesting Multihop Parallel best path selection Immediate best path selection Cognitive radio 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by Visvesvaraya research grant under Media Lab Asia (PhD-MLA/4(29)/2015-16).

References

  1. 1.
    Mitola, J. (1999). Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(4), 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nasir, A. A., Zhou, X., Durrani, S., & Kennedy, R. A. (2013). Relaying protocols for wireless energy harvesting and information processing. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(7), 3622–3636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nasir, A. A., Zhou, X., Durrani, S., & Kennedy, R. A. (2014). Throughput and ergodic capacity of wireless energy harvesting based DF relaying network. In IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), 2014 (pp. 4066–4071).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, Y., Mousavifar, S. A., Deng, Y., Leung, Cl, & Elkashlan, Maged. (2016). Wireless energy harvesting in a cognitive relay network. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 15(4), 2498–2508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chi, X., Zheng, M., Liang, W., Haibin, Y., & Liang, Ying-Chang. (2016). Outage performance of underlay multi-hop cognitive relay networks with energy harvesting. IEICE Transactions on Communications, 6(20), 1148–1151.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krikidis, I., Zheng, G., & Ottersten, B. (2013). Harvest-use cooperative networks with half/full-duplex relaying. In Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), 2013 IEEE, (pp. 4256–4260). IEEE.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tuyen, L. P., & Bao, V. N. Q. (2012). Outage performance analysis of dual-hop af relaying system with underlay spectrum sharing. In IEEE 14th international conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT), 2012, (pp 481–486).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, J., Wang, H., Andrews, J. G., & Hong, D. (2011). Outage probability of cognitive relay networks with interference constraints. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(2), 390–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Najafi, M., Ardebilipour, M., Soleimani-Nasab, E., & Vahidian, S. (2015). Multi-hop cooperative communication technique for cognitive df and af relay networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 83(4), 3209–3221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mondal, S., Roy, S. D., & Kundu, S. (2017). Energy harvesting based multihop relaying in cognitive radio network. Wireless Personal Communications, 97, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mondal, S., Roy, S. D., & Kundu, S. (2017). Primary behaviour based energy harvesting multihop cognitive radio network. IET Communications, 11, 2466–2475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mao, M., Cao, N., Chen, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Multi-hop relaying using energy harvesting. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 4(5), 565–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bao, V. N., Quoc, T. T., Thanh, T. D., & Vu, T. D. (2013). Spectrum sharing-based multi-hop decode-and-forward relay networks under interference constraints: performance analysis and relay position optimization. Journal of Communications and Networks, 15(3), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bao, V. N. Q., Duong, T. Q., da Costa, D. B., Alexandropoulos, G. C., & Nallanathan, Arumugam. (2013). Cognitive amplify-and-forward relaying with best relay selection in non-identical rayleigh fading. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(3), 475–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Do, N. T., Bao, V. N. Q., & An, B. (2016). Outage performance analysis of relay selection schemes in wireless energy harvesting cooperative networks over non-identical rayleigh fading channels. Sensors, 16(3), 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nguyen, N.-P., Duong, T. Q., Ngo, H. Q., Hadzi-Velkov, Z., & Shu, Lei. (2016). Secure 5g wireless communications: A joint relay selection and wireless power transfer approach. IEEE. access, 4, 3349–3359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doan, X.-T., Nguyen, N.-P., Yin, C., Da Costa, D. B., & Duong, Trung Q. (2017). Cognitive full-duplex relay networks under the peak interference power constraint of multiple primary users. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2017(1), 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boddapati, H. K., Prakriya, S., & Bhatnagar, M. R. (2016). Outage analysis of cluster-based multi-hop cognitive radio networks. In IEEE 83rd vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring), 2016, (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bhatnagar, M. R, Mallik, R. K., & Tirkkonen, O. (2016). Performance evaluation of best-path selection in a multihop decode-and-forward cooperative system. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(4), 2722–2728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barua, B., Safaei, F., & Abolhasan, M. (2010). On the outage of multihop parallel relay networks. In IEEE 72nd vehicular technology conference fall (VTC 2010-Fall), 2010, (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar, D., & Kumar, A. (2016) Outage probability analysis of multihop-multicast cooperative system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 148(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (2014). Table of integrals, series, and products. New York: Academic press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ECE DepartmentNational Institute of TechnologyDurgapurIndia

Personalised recommendations