Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 241–254 | Cite as

A Novel Sensor Node Deployment using Low Discrepancy Sequences for WSN

  • Nandkumar KulkarniEmail author
  • Neeli Rashmi Prasad
  • Ramjee Prasad
Article
  • 126 Downloads

Abstract

The foremost challenge in designing Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is careful node placement. Sensor Node placement is a one of the powerful optimization technique for accomplishing the anticipated goals. This paper focuses on categories of node deployment in WSN. The paper highlights various problems and identifies the different objectives in sensor node deployment. The paper proposes a novel node deployment strategy based on Quasi- random method of low-discrepancy sequences to increase the lifetime and the coverage of the network. The aim of the paper is to study how the node deployment affects the different QoS parameters such as packet delivery ratio, average energy consumption, delay, etc. with various multi-objective routing algorithms WSN. To validate the proposal simulation, results are presented in this paper. The paper concludes with the future outlook.

Keywords

Wireless Sensor Network Cluster Green routing Deployment Hybrid routing MOHRA, DyMORA SHRP Control overhead Reaction time LQI 

References

  1. 1.
    Bhateja, V., Krishn, A., Patel, H., & Sahu, A. (2015). Medical image fusion in wavelet and ridgelet domains: A comparative evaluation. International Journal of Rough Sets and Data Analysis (IJRSDA), 2(2), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cinque, M., Coronato, A., & Testa, A. (2012). Dependable services for mobile health monitoring systems. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI), 4(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar, S., & Nagarajan, N. (2013). Integrated network topological control and key management for securing wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI), 5(4), 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nizar Banu, P. K., & Andrews, S. (2015). Performance analysis of hard and soft clustering approaches for gene expression data. International Journal of Rough Sets and Data Analysis (IJRSDA), 2(1), 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pantazis, N., Nikolidakis, S., & Vergados, D. (2013). Energy-efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Journal of IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15(2), 551–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yessad, S., Bouallouche-Medjkoune, L., & Aïssani, D. (2014). A cross-layer routing protocol for balancing energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. Springer Journal of Wireless Personal Communications, 81(3), 1303–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sara, G., & Sridharan, D. (2014). Routing in mobile wireless sensor network: A survey. Springer Journal of Telecommunication Systems, 1(57), 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kulkarni, N., Prasad, R., Cornean, H., & Gupta, N. (2011). Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV & DSR for Quasi Random Deployment of Sensor Nodes in Wireless Sensor Networks. In IEEE International Conference on Devices and Communications (ICDeCom-11), (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xing, X., Xie, D., & Sun, Z. (2015). An approximate optimal coverage set algorithm in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Seventh International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI), (pp. 300–305).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horvat, G., Zagar, D., & Vinko, D. (2014). Influence of node deployment parameters on QoS in large-scale WSN. In IEEE 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), (pp. 202–205).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oliveira, L. M., & Rodrigues, J. J. (2011). Wireless sensor networks: a survey on environmental monitoring. Journal Communication, 6(2), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Durisic, M. P., Tafa, Z., Dimic, G., & Milutinovic, V. (2012). A survey of military applications of wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Mediterranean conference on embedded computing (MECO), (pp. 196–199).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, G., Tan, R., Zhou, C. M., González, S., Cao, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2013). Enabling low bit-rate and reliable video surveillance over practical wireless sensor network. Journal Supercomputing, 65(1), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Honghai, Z., & Jennifer, C., H. (2005). Maintaining sensing coverage and connectivity in large sensor networks. In Handbook on Theoretical and Algorithmic Aspects of Sensor, AdHocWireless and Peer-to-Peer Networks, Auerbach Publications.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghosh, A., & Das, S. K. (2006). Coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks. In R. Shorey (Ed.), Mobile, Wireless, and Sensor Networks: Technology, Applications, and Future Directions, John Wiley & Sons, (pp.221–256).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poe, W. Y., & Schmitt, J. B. (2009). Node Deployment in Large Wireless Sensor Networks: Coverage, Energy Consumption, and Worst-case Delay (pp. 1–8). AINTEC: Proc. ACM.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abo-Zahhad, M., Sabor, N., Sasaki, S., & Ahmed, S. M. (2016). A centralized immune-Voronoi deployment algorithm for coverage maximization and energy conservation in mobile WSNs. Journal of Information Fusion, Elsevier, 30, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rawat, P., Singh, K. D., Chaouchi, H., & Bonnin, J. M. (2014). Wireless sensor networks: A survey on recent developments and potential synergies. Journal of Supercomputing, 68(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kapnadak, V., & Coyle, E. J. (2014). Optimal non-uniform deployment of sensors for distributed detection in wireless sensor networks. ACM Transaction Sensor Network, 10, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sevgia, C., & Koçyiğitb, A. (2014). Optimal deployment in randomly deployed heterogeneous WSNs: A connected coverage approach. Journal of Network and Computer Applications., 46, 182–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sengupta, S., Das, S., Nasir, M. D., & Panigrahi, B. K. (2012). Multi-objective node deployment in WSNs. In search of an optimal trade-off among coverage, lifetime, energy consumption and connectivity. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26, 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramalakshmi, R., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2013). Coverage and connectivity guaranteed deterministic deployment pattern for WSN. Computer Networks & Communications (NetCom), 13, 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Halder, S., Ghosal, A., Chaudhuri, A., & DasBit, S. (2011). A Probability Density Function for Energy-Balanced Lifetime-Enhancing Node Deployment in WSN. In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Computational Science and its Application, LNCS, vol. 6018, (pp. 472–487).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Halder, S., Ghosal, A., & DasBit, S. (2011). A pre-determined node deployment strategy to prolong network lifetime in wireless sensor network. Computer Communications, 34(11), 1294–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marks, M. (2010). A survey of multi-objective deployment in wireless sensor network. Journal of Telecommunication and Information Technology, 3, 36–41.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lemieux, C. (2009). Quasi- Monte Carlo constructions. In Book Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Sampling, Springer series in Statistics, (pp. 139–197).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business Development and TechnologyAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.International Technological University (ITU)San JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations