Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 97, Issue 1, pp 153–161 | Cite as

Effect of External Antenna Patterns for a GMR-1 3G Handset on Satellite Forward Link Radio Channels

Article
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Based on the measurements for a GEO-mobile radio-1 third generation (GMR-1 3G) handset with different external antennas in free space as well as with the head and hand setups, effects of the antenna patterns on a satellite forward link radio channel are studied in this paper. When merging the antenna gain patterns into Rayleigh and Ricean channels proposed in GMR-1 3G standard, it’s found that the received power in satellite forward link has big deviation from original Rayleigh and Ricean distributions. At the same time, the performances for different external antennas are evaluated, it’s found that helix octafilar with 16 mm diameter is much better than other external antennas which are aimed to be directed to a specific angular range in the elevation plane for a geo-satellite mobile system.

Keywords

GMR-1 3G Antenna pattern Rayleigh Rice Radio channel Signal power 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Department of Science and Technology, State Grid, China. Thank Mr. Liang Li for helping us to format the final version of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao, X., Kivinen, J., & Vainikainen, P. (2003). Characterization of Doppler spectra for mobile communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 52(2), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kivinen, J., Zhao, X., & Vainikainen, P. (2001). Empirical characterization of wideband indoor radio channel at 5.3 GHz. IEEE transactions on antennas propagation, 49(8), 1192–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geng, S., & Vainikainen, P. (2009). Mm-wave propagation in indoor corridors. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 8, 1242–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    GMR-1 3G 45.005, ETSI TS 101 376-5-5, v3.1.1 (2009). GEO-mobile radio interface specifications (Release 3); Third generation satellite packet radio service; Part 5: Radio interface physical layer specifications; Sub Part 5: Radio transmission and reception.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yin, X., Ling, C., & Kim, M. D. (2015). Experimental multipath-cluster characteristics of 28-GHz propagation channel. IEEE Access, 3, 3138–3150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao, X., et al. (2017). Channel measurements, modeling, simulation and validation at 32 GHz in outdoor microcells for 5G radio systems. IEEE Access, 5, 1062–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arapoglou, P. D., Michailidis, E., Panagopoulo, A. D., Kanatas, A. G., & Prieto-Cerdeira, R. (2011). The land mobile earth-space channel: SISO to MIMO modeling from L- to Ka-bands. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 6(2), 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Erceg, V., et al. (1997). Comparisons of a computer-based propagation prediction tool with experimental data collected in urban microcellular environments. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 15(4), 677–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guodiantong CorporationState Grid Information and Telecommunications GroupBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringNorth China Electric Power UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations