Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 96, Issue 3, pp 4145–4166 | Cite as

Impact of Opportunistic Spectrum Sharing on the Performance of Amplify-and-Forward Incremental Relaying

  • Ala Abu AlkheirEmail author
  • Mohamed Ibnkahla
Article
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

Multihop communication is widely used in cognitive radio networks to facilitate agile access to opportunistically available spectrum resources while adequately protecting primary users (PUs). However, the performance of this collaborative communication is sensitive to spectrum sensing accuracy and the unpredictable activities of PUs. To quantify the impact of these factors, this article studies the performance of amplify and forward based incremental relaying (IR) in an opportunistic spectrum sharing environment. Using rigorous mathematical analysis, closed form expressions are derived for the average spectral efficiency and the outage probability. The derived results show that imperfect spectrum sensing and the unpredictable activities of PUs degrade the quality of the direct link and thwart the relay from assisting the destination, hence causing significant performance losses. To recover some of these losses, this article proposes a novel selective IR protocol that allows the source to retransmit whenever the relay fails to assist the destination. Hence, creating a second chance of assistance. This protocol is shown to outperform IR while not sacrificing spectral efficiency. Computer simulations are used to verify the accuracy of the derived results.

Keywords

Cognitive radio Incremental relaying Spectrum sensing Selective incremental relaying 

References

  1. 1.
    Abu Alkheir, A., & Ibnkahla, M. (2011). Performance analysis of cognitive radio relay networks using decode and forward selection relaying over Rayleigh fading channels. In IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abu Alkheir, A., & Ibnkahla, M. (2012a). Outage performance of decode and forward incremental relaying in an overlay spectrum sharing environment. In Biennial symposium on communications (QBSC) (pp. 128–131).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abu Alkheir, A., & Ibnkahla, M. (2012b). Performance analysis of decode and forward incremental relaying in the presence of multiple sources of interference. In IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall) (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abu Alkheir, A., & Ibnkahla, M. (2013). An accurate approximation of the exponential integral function using a sum of exponentials. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(7), 1364–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akyildiz, I. F., Lo, B. F., & Balakrishnan, R. (2011). Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: A survey. Physical Communications, 4(1), 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Axell, E., Leus, G., Larsson, E., & Poor, H. (2012). Spectrum sensing for cognitive radio: State-of-the-art and recent advances. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(3), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ben Letaief, K., & Zhang, W. (2009). Cooperative communications for cognitive radio networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(5), 878–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chu, S. I. (2014). Outage probability and DMT performance of underlay cognitive networks with incremental DF and AF relaying over Nakagami-m fading channels. IEEE Communications Letters, 18(1), 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Digham, F., Alouini, M. S., & Simon, M. (2003). On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels. In Proceedings of IEEE ICC (Vol. 5, pp. 3575–3579).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duong, T., Bao, V., & Zepernick, H. J. (2011). Exact outage probability of cognitive af relaying with underlay spectrum sharing. Electronics Letters, 47(17), 1001–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (2007). Table of integrals, series, and products (7th ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hasna, M., & Alouini, M. S. (2003). End-to-end performance of transmission systems with relays over Rayleigh-fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2(6), 1126–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, H., Li, Z., Si, J., & Gao, R. (2013). Outage analysis of underlay cognitive multiple relays networks with a direct link. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(8), 1600–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hwang, K. S., Ko, Y. C., & Alouini, M. S. (2008). Performance analysis of incremental relaying with relay selection and adaptive modulation over non-identically distributed cooperative paths. In IEEE international symposium on information theory (ISIT) (pp. 2678–2682).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ikki, S., & Ahmed, M. (2008). Performance analysis of incremental relaying cooperative diversity networks over Rayleigh fading channels. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 1311–1315).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ikki, S., & Ahmed, M. (2009). Performance analysis of decode-and-forward incremental relaying cooperative-diversity networks over Rayleigh fading channels. In IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC-Spring) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ikki, S., Aïssa, S. (2010). Performance analysis of dual-hop relaying systems in the presence of co-channel interference. In IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ikki, S., & Aïssa, S. (2011). Effects of co-channel interference on the error probability performance of multi-hop relaying networks. In IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ikki, S. S., & Aissa, S. (2012). Multihop wireless relaying systems in the presence of cochannel interferences: Performance analysis and design optimization. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(2), 566–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim, J. B., & Kim, D. (2012). Outage probability and achievable diversity order of opportunistic relaying in cognitive secondary radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 60(9), 2456–2466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laneman, J., Tse, D., & Wornell, G. (2004). Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(12), 3062–3080.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liang, Y. C., Zeng, Y., Peh, E., & Hoang, A. T. (2008). Sensing-throughput tradeoff for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(4), 1326–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liang, Y. C., Chen, K. C., Li, G. Y., & Mahonen, P. (2011). Cognitive radio networking and communications: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(7), 3386–3407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Papoulis, A., & Pillai, S. U. (2002). Probability, random variables and stochastic processes (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sengupta, S., & Subbalakshmi, K. (2013). Open research issues in multi-hop cognitive radio networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(4), 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Suraweera, H., Michalopoulos, D., Schober, R., Karagiannidis, G., & Nallanathan, A. (2011). Fixed gain amplify-and-forward relaying with co-channel interference. In IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp 1–6).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suraweera, H., Michalopoulos, D., & Yuen, C. (2012). Performance analysis of fixed gain relay systems with a single interferer in Nakagami-\(m\) fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(3), 1457–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tourki, K., Qaraqe, K., & Alouini, M. S. (2013). Outage analysis for underlay cognitive networks using incremental regenerative relaying. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62(2), 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Umar, R., Sheikh, A., & Deriche, M. (2014). Unveiling the hidden assumptions of energy detector based spectrum sensing for cognitive radios. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 16(2), 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, J., Ghosh, M., & Challapali, K. (2011). Emerging cognitive radio applications: A survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(3), 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yucek, T., & Arslan, H. (2009). A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 11(1), 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Systems and Computer EngineeringCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations