Improving Security of Lightweight Authentication Technique for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks
- 307 Downloads
One of the great application of user authentication and key agreement protocol is to access sensor information securely over the insecure networks. Recently, Kalra and Sood proposed an efficient smart card based authentication protocol to exchange confidential information securely between the user and sensor node. We review the security of Kalra and Sood scheme and observe that their scheme is vulnerable to stolen smart card attack, stolen verifier attack and impersonation attack. The entire analysis indicates that there is a need of secure and user-friendly authentication mechanism for wireless sensor networks (WSNs). To ensure secure communication in WSNs, we improve the security of the authentication mechanism for WSNs. The main intention of this paper is to confiscate the mentioned security attacks by proposing an efficient authentication protocol using smart card. To validate security attributes, we have used well-popular AVISPA simulation tool whose results shows that the proposed protocol is SAFE under OFMC and CL-AtSe models. Further, the performance analysis shows its efficiency.
KeywordsWireless sensor networks Authentication Security
- 1.Amin, R., & Biswas, G. P. (2016). A secure light weight scheme for user authentication and key agreement in multi-gateway based wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 36, 58–80. Google Scholar
- 2.Armando, A., Basin, D., Boichut, Y., Chevalier, Y., Compagna, L., Cuéllar, J., Drielsma, P. H., Héam, P.-C., Kouchnarenko, O., & Mantovani, J., et al. (2005). The avispa tool for the automated validation of internet security protocols and applications. In Computer Aided Verification. Springer, pp. 281–285.Google Scholar
- 3.Automated Validation of Internet Security Protocols and Applications. http://www.avispa-project.org/. Accessed on January 2014.
- 9.Eisenbarth, T. Kasper, T., Moradi, A., Paar, C., Salmasizadeh, M., & Shalmani, M. T. M. (2008). On the power of power analysis in the real world: A complete break of the keeloq code hopping scheme. In Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO. Springer, 2008, pp. 203–220.Google Scholar
- 10.He, D., Kumar, N., & Chilamkurti, N. (2015). A secure temporal-credential-based mutual authentication and key agreement scheme with pseudo identity for wireless sensor networks. Information Sciences 321, 263–277. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2015.02.010. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025515001012.
- 11.He, D., Gao, Y., Chan, S., Chen, C., & Bu, J. (2010). An enhanced two-factor user authentication scheme in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks, 10(4), 361–371.Google Scholar
- 17.Kocher, K., Jaffe, J., & Jun, B. (1999). Differential power analysis. In Advances in Cryptology CRYPTO’99. Springer, pp. 388–397.Google Scholar
- 18.Maitra, T., Amin, R., Giri, D., & Srivastava, P. D. (2016). An efficient and robust user authentication scheme for hierarchical wireless sensor networks without tamper-proof smart card. International Journal of Network Security, 18(1), 553–564.Google Scholar
- 27.Wander, A. S., Gura, N., Eberle, H., Gupta, V., & Shantz, S. C. (2005). Energy analysis of public-key cryptography for wireless sensor networks. In Third IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications, 2005. PerCom 2005, IEEE, pp. 324–328.Google Scholar
- 28.Watro, R., Kong, D., Cuti, S. -F., Gardiner, C., Lynn, C., & Kruus, P. (2004). Tinypk: Securing sensor networks with public key technology. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on security of ad hoc and sensor networks, ACM, pp. 59–64.Google Scholar
- 29.Wong, K. H., Zheng, Y., Cao, J., & Wang, S. (2006). A dynamic user authentication scheme for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, 2006, IEEE, Vol. 1, p. 8.Google Scholar