Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 84, Issue 4, pp 3075–3089 | Cite as

Performance Analysis of Different Link Layer Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN)

  • Pablo PadillaEmail author
  • José Luis Padilla
  • Juan F. Valenzuela-Valdés
  • José-Vicente Serrán-González
  • Miguel Angel López-Gordo
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a fair comparison between different representative link layer protocols for wireless sensor networks: S-MAC, DRAND and Z-MAC protocols. The performance of these protocols is evaluated in terms of power consumption, the use of the propagation channel resources and the traffic rate provided for each node and the overall aggregated traffic. For the experimentation and the performance analysis, an evaluation scenario is built up, including a set of nodes randomly placed around reference places. This scenario is evaluated under different circumstances and traffic load levels. In addition, some conflictive issues are included, such as the presence of ‘bottle necks’ or egoist nodes in the network, and their influence is analyzed for each protocol in order to determine which one copes better with hostile conditions.

Keywords

Link layer protocols Wireless sensor networks Energy efficiency Distributed traffic rate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by a PYR-2014 GENIL project (PYR-2014-CEB09-0010/MICINN), and a CEI BioTIC project.

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anastasi, G., Conti, M., Di Francesco, M., & Passarella, A. (2009). Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(3), 537–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Padilla, P., Camacho, J., Maciá, G., García, P., Díaz, J. E., & Gómez-Calero, C. (2013). On the influence of the propagation channel in the performance of energy efficient geographic routing algorithms for wireless sensor networks (WSN). Wireless Personal Communications, 70(1), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rajendran, V., Obraczka, K., & Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J. J. (2006). Energy-efficient, collision-free medium access control for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Net-works, 12(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akyildiz, I. F., Melodia, T., & Chowdury, K. R. (2007). Wireless multimedia sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Communications, 14(6), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petcharat, S., Utz, R., & Andrew, S. (2012). A survey of MAC protocols for mission-critical applications in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(2), 240–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ye, W., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2004). Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 12(3), 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Dam. T., & Langendoen, K. (2003). An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In ACM proceedings of the 1st international conference on embedded networked sensor systems, New York, NY (pp. 171–180).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rhee, I., Warrier, A., Min, J., & Xu, L. (2009). DRAND: Distributed randomized TDMA scheduling for wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(10), 1384–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rhee, I., Warrier, A., Aia, M., Min, J., & Sichitiu, M. L. (2008). Z-MAC: a hybrid MAC for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 16(3), 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polstre, J., Hill, J., & Culler, D. (2004). Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In ACM proceedings of the 2st international conference on embedded networked sensor systems (pp. 95–107).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoo, D., Park, S., Choi, S., & Park, S. H. (2008). Dynamic S-MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks based on network traffic states. 14th Asia-Pacific conference on communications, 14–16 Oct 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    El-Hoiydi, A., & Decotignie, J. D. (2004). WiseMAC: an ultra-low power MAC protocol for the downlink of infrastructure wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Computers and Communications, 1, 244–251.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang, Y. C., Jiang, J. R., Sheu, J. P., & Shih, H. Y. (2008). ADCA: An asynchronous duty cycle adjustment MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, IEEE GLOBECOM.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu, W., Li, X., & Yousefizadeh, H. (2009). LA-MAC: A load adaptive MAC protocol for MANETs. IEEE global telecommunications conference, IEEE GLOBECOM.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Hoesel, L. F. W., Nieberg, T., Kip, H. J., & Havinga, P. J. M. (2004). Advantage of a TDMA based, energy-efficient, self-organizing MAC protocol for WSNs. In Proceeding of IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC) (pp. 1598–1602), 2004.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Hoesel, L. F. W., & Havinga, P. J. M. (2004). A lightweight medium access protocol (LMAC) for wireless sensor network: Reducing preamble transmissions and transceiver state switches. In Proceeding of international workshop on networked sensing systems (INSS) (pp. 1481–1486), Mar 16–20, 2004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Song, H., Chun, D. Y., & Chang, G. (2008). A modified directional MAC protocol for using smart antenna in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. International conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    The Network Simulator, NS–2: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Padilla
    • 1
    Email author
  • José Luis Padilla
    • 2
  • Juan F. Valenzuela-Valdés
    • 3
  • José-Vicente Serrán-González
    • 1
  • Miguel Angel López-Gordo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Signal Theory, Telematics and Communications – CITICUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Computer Technology – CITICUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Computer and Telematic Systems EngineeringUniversity of ExtremaduraMeridaSpain

Personalised recommendations