Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 74, Issue 3, pp 1021–1032 | Cite as

Software-Based Management for Ethernet Networks

  • Markus Hager
  • Thomas Finke
  • Jochen Seitz
  • Thomas Waas
Article

Abstract

An adequate network management is an essential part for each network permitting to keep the network performance at a suitable level. In this paper, we present our work focusing on an Ethernet network which is used as background interconnection technology for a smart home system in large buildings like tenements or an office block. In this case the network is larger and especially the applications are quite heterogeneous as compared to a private smart home system. Therefore, it is hard to supply a fair and quality of service aware network meeting all the demands. This is especially challenging in the case of an Ethernet network because this technology was intended to use it as a transparent connection system without the feature to support hard quality of service. We present how this problem could be solved by a middleware which best meets the special requirement of the mentioned use case. Finally, we discuss possible design improvements of this solution and present the recent Ethernet standards that could help solve this problem in an alternative way.

Keywords

Network management Ethernet Congestion Middleware 

References

  1. 1.
    Allan, D., Farkas, J., & Mansfield, S. (2012). Intelligent load balancing for shortest path bridging. IEEE Communications Magazine. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2012.6231293.
  2. 2.
    Bannazadeh, H., & Leon-Garcia, A. (2010). A distributed ethernet traffic shaping system. In: 2010 17th IEEE workshop on local and metropolitan area networks (LANMAN).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Da Silva Campos, B., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Mendes, L., Nakamura, E., & Figueiredo, C. (2011). Design and construction of wireless sensor network gateway with IPv4/IPv6 support. In 2011 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–5). doi:10.1109/icc.2011.5962848.
  4. 4.
    Dreibholz, T., Rathgeb, E., Ru andngeler, I., Seggelmann, R., Tu andxen, M., & Stewart, R. (2011). Stream control transmission protocol: Past, current, and future standardization activities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(4), 82–88. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2011.5741151.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hager, M., Begerow, P., Krasovsky, P., Renhak, K., & Seitz, J. (2012). Quality of service concept for smart home services. In 2012 Fourth international conference on ubiquitous and future networks (ICUFN). doi:10.1109/ICUFN.2012.6261708.
  6. 6.
    Hager, M., Debes, M., Schellenberg, S., & Seitz, J. (2013). IP-based access to sensor networks enabled by a transparent proxy server. In 2013 International conference on information networking (ICOIN) (pp. 623–627 ). doi:10.1109/ICOIN.2013.6496698.
  7. 7.
    Hager, M., Schellenberg, S., Seitz, J., Mann, S., & Schorcht, G. (2012). Secure and QoS-aware communications for smart home services. In 2012 35th International conference on telecommunications and signal processing (TSP) (pp. 11–17). doi:10.1109/TSP.2012.6256188.
  8. 8.
    IEEE 802.1 Audio/Video Bridging Task Group Home Page: (2011). http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/avbridges.html.
  9. 9.
    McAlpine, G. (2005). Congestion control for switched ethernet. In 14th International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC-14) 2005, in Research Triangle Park. North Carolina, USA. http://www.cercs.gatech.edu/hpidc2005/presentations/GaryMcAlpine.pdf.
  10. 10.
    McAlpine, G., Wadekar, M., Gupta, T., Crouch, A., & Newell, D. (2005). An architecture for congestion management in ethernet clusters. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE international parallel and distributed processing symposium (IPDPS’05)—Workshop 9 (IPDPS ’05).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miyazaki, K., Nishimura, K., Tanaka, J., & Kotabe, S. (2012). First-come first-served routing for the data center network: Low latency loop-free routing. In World telecommunications congress (WTC).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perlman, R. (2009). Challenges and opportunities in the design of TRILL: A routed layer 2 technology. In IEEE GLOBECOM workshops. doi:10.1109/GLOCOMW.2009.5360776.
  13. 13.
    Reinemo, S., Skeie, T., & Wadekar, M. (2010). Ethernet for high-performance data centers: On the new IEEE datacenter bridging standards. IEEE Micro, 30(4), 42–51. doi:10.1109/MM.2010.65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Santos, D., de Sousa, A., Alvelos, F., Dzida, M., Pioro, M., & Zagozdzon, M. (2009). Traffic engineering of multiple spanning tree routing networks: The load balancing case. In Next generation internet networks. doi:10.1109/NGI.2009.5175784.
  15. 15.
    Sommer, J., Gunreben, S., Feller, F., Kohn, M., Mifdaoui, A., Sass, D., et al. (2010). Ethernet—A survey on its fields of application. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 12(2), 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    TCPDump and LibPCap. (2011). The official web site: http://www.tcpdump.org.
  17. 17.
    Zamora-Izquierdo, M. A., Santa, J., & Gomez-Skarmeta, A. F. (2010). An integral and networked home automation solution for indoor ambient intelligence. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 9, 66–77. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2010.20.
  18. 18.
    Zhang, Y., Yu, R., Xie, S., Yao, W., Xiao, Y., & Guizani, M. (April, 2011). Home M2M networks: Architectures, standards, and QoS improvement. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(4), 44–52. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2011.5741145.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Hager
    • 1
  • Thomas Finke
    • 1
  • Jochen Seitz
    • 1
  • Thomas Waas
    • 2
  1. 1.Communication Networks GroupIlmenau University of TechnologyIlmenauGermany
  2. 2.Communication Networks GroupUniversity of Applied Science RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations