Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 71, Issue 4, pp 2783–2803 | Cite as

Comprehensive Performance Analysis of ZigBee Technology Based on Real Measurements

  • Lubomir Mraz
  • Vladimir Cervenka
  • Dan Komosny
  • Milan Simek


Although the ZigBee technology is massively deployed the performance question still remains unanswered. There is a lack of serious performance evaluations and thus this paper provides a comprehensive and unbiased study of the ZigBee PRO technology. An extensive real measurement was conducted to accomplish this task. We found out a big performance gap among ZigBee implementations even though they are compliant with the ZigBee standard. The presented results and analysis could be beneficial for many wireless sensor network developers.


Analysis Bitcloud IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless sensor network ZigBee 



Research described in this paper was prepared within the framework of No.FRTI2/571 grant project of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic. Holder of Brno PhD Talent Financial Aid - Sponsored by Brno City Municipality.


  1. 1.
    IMS Research, The World Market for Low-power Wireless—2011 Edition, Available:
  2. 2.
    IEEE Computer Society, et al. (2012). Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs), 2nd rev. edn, 3 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016–5997, USA: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 2006, Available: Accessed 12 June 2012.
  3. 3.
    ZigBee Alliance (2012). ZigBee Pro 2007 specification, Available: Accessed 12 June 2012.
  4. 4.
    Pinedo-Frausto, E. D., Garcia-Macias, J. A., (2008). An experimental analysis of ZigBee networks, Local Computer Networks. LCN 2008, pp. 723–729, 14–17 October 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsertou, A., & Laurenson, D. I. (2008). Revisiting the hidden terminal problem in a CSMA/CA wireless network. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(7), 817–831.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng, J., & Lee, M. J. (2004). A comprehensive performance study of 802.15.4. New York: IEEE Press Book.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jennic Ltd. (2006-08-15). Calculating 802.15.4 data rates, Application note JN-AN-1035. Availa- ble: Accessed 12 June 2012.
  8. 8.
    Woon, W. T. H., & Wan, T. C., (2006). Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 Ad Hoc wireless sensor networks: Simulation approach, systems, man and cybernetics, 2006. SMC ‘06 (vol. 2, pp. 1443–1448), October 8–11, 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Latré, B., Mil, P. D., Moerman, I., Dhoedt, B., Demeester, P., & Dierdonck, N. V. (2006). Throughput and delay analysis of unslotted IEEE 802.15.4, presented at JNW, pp. 20–28.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Song. C.-C., Feng, C.-F., Wang, C.-H., & Liaw, D.-C. (2011). Simulation and experimental analysis of a ZigBee sensor network with fault detection and reconfiguration mechanism, control conference (ASCC), 8th Asian, (pp. 659–664), May 15–18, 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hammoodi, I. S., Stewart, B. G., Kocian, A., & McMeekin, S. G., (2009). A comprehensive performance study of OPNET modeler for ZigBee wireless sensor networks. Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies. NGMAST ‘09., (pp. 357–362), September 15–18, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nefzi, B., & Song, Y.-Q. (2007). Performance analysis and improvement of ZigBee routing protocol. 7th IFAC international conference on fieldbuses & networks in Industrial & embedded systems.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weiye, T., & Jieqiong, Z. (2011). The performance study of ZigBee mesh network. Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), pp. 407–409, May 27–29, 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, J., Zhu, X., Tang, N., & Sui, J. (2010). Study on ZigBee network architecture and routing algorithm. Signal Processing Systems (ICSPS), (vol. 2, pp. 389–393), July, 2010.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dhama, N., Kaur, P., Kumar, N., Patel, R.B., & Singh, B.P., (2010). Simulation and performance evaluation of ZigBee for wireless sensor networks having multiple events occurring simultaneously at a time. AIP conference proceedings of 1324, pp. 85–89, December, 2010Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Song, C.-C., Feng, C.-F., Wang, C.-H., & Liaw, D.-C. (2011). Simulation and experimental analysis of a ZigBee sensor network with fault detection and reconfiguration mechanism, control conference (ASCC), pp. 659–664, May 15–18, 2011Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fernández-lópez, H., Correia, J. H., Simões, R., & Afonso, J. A. (2010). Experimental Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee for Multi-Patient ECG Monitoring, ICST conference on electronic healthcare for the 21st century Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, A., Namboothiri, P. G., Deshpande, S., Vidhyadharan, S., Sivalingam, K. M., & Murty, S. A. V. S. (2012). Testbed based throughput analysis in a Wireless Sensor Network, communications (NCC), pp. 1–5, February 3–5, 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lubomir Mraz
    • 1
  • Vladimir Cervenka
    • 1
  • Dan Komosny
    • 1
  • Milan Simek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of TelecommunicationsBrno University of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations