Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 1915–1929 | Cite as

A Transmission Rate Control Algorithm Based on Non-cooperative Differential Game Model in Deep Space Networks



Designing a fair and efficient rate allocation scheme to maximize network performance is a challenging issue for deep space networks. Transmission rate not only affects link signal quality, but also affects network performance. In this study, a novel rate allocation framework based on differential game to settle rate allocation problems among different sources in deep space networks is proposed, and rate allocation criteria based on feedback Nash equilibrium solution is formulated. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation demonstrate our proposed optimal rate allocation scheme can be used to maximize network performance.


Deep space networks Differential game Nash equilibrium Rate allocation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Zhou, X., Zhang, L., Cheng, Z., He, H., Wang, J., & Chen, Y. (2010). Hypernetwork model and architecture for deep space information networks. In Proceedings of IEEE ICFIT 2010, Changsha, China (pp. 8309–8317).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akyildiz I. F., Akan O. B., Chen C., Fang J., Su W. (2003) InterPlaNetary Internet: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Computer Networks 43: 75–112MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Durst R. C., Miller G. J., Travis E. J. (1997) TCP extensions for space communications. Wireless Networks 3(5): 389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sekhar, A., Manoj, B. S., & Murthy Siva Ram, C. (2004). MARVIN: Movement-aware routing over Interplanetary networks. In IEEE SECON 2004. 2004 First annual IEEE communications society conference on sensor and ad hoc communications and networks (pp. 245–254).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Isaacs R. (1965) Differential games. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellman R. (1957) Dynamic programming. Princeton University Press, PrincetonMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nash J.F. (1951) Non-cooperative games. Annals of mathematics 54: 286–295MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, X. B., Zhou, X. W., & Song, J. D. (2011). Transmission power control and routing strategy based on differential games in deep space exploration. Wireless Personal Communications. doi:10.1007/s11277-011-0417-1.
  9. 9.
    Altman E., Basar T. (1998) Multiuser rate-based flow control. IEEE Transactions on communications 46(7): 940–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Basar T., Zhu Q. (2011) Prices of anarchy, information, and cooperation in differential games. Dynamic Games and Applications 1: 50–73MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miao X. N., Zhou X. W., Wu H. Y. (2010a) A cooperative differential game model based on network throughput and energy efficiency in wireless networks. Optimization Letters 38: 292–295MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miao X. N., Zhou X. W., Wu H. Y. (2010b) A cooperative differential game model based on transmission rate in wireless networks. Operations Research Letters 38: 292–295MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, L., Zhou, X. W., & Guo, J. W. (2012). Noncooperative dynamic routing with bandwidth constraint in intermittently connected deep space information networks under scheduled contacts. Wireless Personal Communications. doi:10.1007/s11277-012-0507-8.
  14. 14.
    Fang J., Akyildiz I. F. (2007) RCP-Planet: A rate control protocol for InterPlaNetary Internet. International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking 25(2): 167–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fang J., Akan O. B. (2004) Performance of multimedia rate control protocols in InterPlaNetary Internet. IEEE Communications Letters 6(11): 478–480Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grieco L.A., Mascolo S. (2005) A congestion control algorithm for the deep space Internet. Space Communications 20: 155–160Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gardikis G., Kourtis A. (2007) A cross-layer rate control mechanism for link-adaptive satellite integrated services. Research Letters in Communications 2007: 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alagoz F., Walters D. (2001) Adaptive rate control and QoS provisioning in direct broadcast satellite networks. Wireless Networks 7(3): 269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Castro, M. A. V., Han, Z., Hjorungnes, A., & Marina, N. (2009). Rate allocation for satellite systems with correlated channels based on a Stackelberg game. In International conference on game theory for networks (pp. 638–645).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marchese M., Mongelli M. (2007) Adaptive rate allocation and resource planning for service level agreement maintenance in satellite communications. Computer Communications 2007(30): 3179–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yeung D. W. K. (2007) Dynamically consistent cooperative solution in a differential game of transboundary industrial pollution. Journal of optimization theory and applications 134(1): 143–160MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuniyur S., Srikant R. (2003) End-to-end congestion control schemes: Utility functions, random losses and ECN marks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 10(5): 689–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yeung D. W. K., Petrosyan L. A. (2005) Cooperative stochastic differential games. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication Engineering, School of Computer and Communication EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations