Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 83–99 | Cite as

Capacity Maximization through Energy-Aware Multi-Mode Relaying

  • Nikolaos Nomikos
  • Dimitrios N. Skoutas
  • Demosthenes Vouyioukas
  • Christos Verikoukis
  • Charalabos Skianis
Article

Abstract

In future wireless mobile networks, data rate and quality of service are expected to be comparable to those of wired deployments. To achieve this target, novel architectures must be adopted, successfully countering the disadvantages of the wireless transmission. Inspired by that, cooperative relaying was proposed because of the various gains it introduces to the network. In this work we propose a scheme consisting of multi-mode decode and forward relays facilitating the communication between a base station and a user terminal (UT). By equipping the relays with two interfaces, we can exploit the plethora of the available wireless protocols. Also, instead of performing multi-relay transmissions, we adopt an opportunistic relaying scheme due to its simplicity and outage-optimality. Additionally, we incorporate successive transmissions to improve the spectral efficiency, thus recovering the half-duplex loss in capacity due to the two-hop transmission. However, as inter-relay interference arises from successive transmissions, we propose mitigation techniques through interference cancellation and out-band transmissions using the multi-mode relays. At the same time, an energy-aware mechanism is implemented in the selected relay’s transmission, opting for power reduction, as the channel state information is acquired prior to the signal’s forwarding to the UT. Finally, we give numerical results by comparing the proposed energy-aware multi-mode relaying (EA-MMR) scheme, with two other schemes in terms of average end-to-end capacity, outage probability, delay distribution and power gain.

Keywords

Opportunistic relaying Successive relaying Multi mode relaying energy-aware relaying 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bletsas A., Shin H., Win M. Z. (2007) Cooperative communications with outage-optimal opportunistic relaying. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 6(9): 3450–3460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laneman J. N., Tse D. N. C., Wornell G. W. (2004) Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information theory 50(12): 3062–3080CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rankov B., Wittneben A. (2007) Spectral efficient protocols for half-duplex fading relay channels. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 25(2): 379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen X., Zhou Q. F., Siu T., Lau F. C. M. (2011) Asymptotic analysis of opportunistic relaying based on the max-generalized-mean selection criterion. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication 10(4): 1050–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu P., Dai X., Ding Z., Krikidis I. (2011) Approaching MISO upper bound: Design of new wireless cooperative transmission protocols. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication 10(8): 2725–2737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waqar, O., McLernon, D. C., & Ghogho, M. (2009). Performance analysis of non-regenerative opportunistic relaying in Nakagami-m fading. In IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) (pp. 232–233). Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Majhi, S., Qian, H., Xiang, W., Addepalli, S., & Gao, Z. (2011). Analysis of outage probability for opportunistic decode-and-forward relaying network over asymmetric fading channels. In IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN) (pp. 135–139). Dalian, China.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, J. B., & Kim, D. (2009). Outage probability of opportunistic decode-and-forward relaying with co-channel interferences. In IEEE International Conference on Advanced Communications Technology (ICAT) (pp. 919–922). Gangwon-Do, Korea.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bletsas A., Dimitriou A. G., Sahalos J. N. (2010) Interference-limited opportunistic relaying with reactive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 9(1): 14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun L., Zhang T., Niu H. (2011) Inter-relay interference in two-path digital relaying systems: Detrimental or beneficial?. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 10(8): 2468–2473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wicaksana, H., Ting, S. H., Ho, C. K., Chin, W. H., & Guan, W. L. (2008). On the diversity order of AF cooperative systems with inter-relay interference cancellation. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Spring (VTC) (pp. 634–638). Marina Bay, Singapore.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo C., Gong Y., Zheng F. (2011) Full interference cancelation for two-path relay cooperative networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 60(1): 77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, Y., & Choi, W. (2010). Interference cancelation based opportunistic relaying with multiple decode-and-forward relays. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Fall (VTC) (pp. 1–5). Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khandekar, A., Bhusan, N., Tingfang, J., & Vanghi, V. (2010). LTE-advanced: Heterogeneous networks. In IEEE European Wireless Conference (EW) (pp. 978–982). Lucca, Italy.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buljore S., Harada H., Filin S., Houze P., Tsagkaris K., Holland O. et al (2009) Architecture and enablers for optimized radio resource usage in heterogeneous wireless access networks: The IEEE 1900.4 working group. IEEE Communications Magazine 47(1): 124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andersson K., Ahlund C. (2011) Optimized access network selection in a combined WLAN/LTE environment. Wireless Personal Communications 61(4): 739–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xue, P., Gong, P., Park, J. H., Park, D., & Kim, D. K. (2009). Max-min fairness based radio resource management in fourth generation heterogeneous networks. In IEEE International Symposium on Communications and Information Technology (ISCIT) (208–213). Incheon, Korea.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Magagula, L. A., Chan, H. A., & Falowo, O. E. (2010). Handover coordination with a relay-based design for heterogeneous wireless networks. In IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) (pp. 380–383). Denver, USA.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao, Z., Ji, Y., & Liu, F. (2010). Performance analysis of cooperative handover in heterogeneous wireless networks. In IEEE GLOBECOM Workshop on Heterogeneous, Multi-hop Wireless and Mobile Networks (GC Wkshps) (pp. 191–195). Miami, USA.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Correia L.M., Zeller D., Blume O., Ferling D., Jading Y., Godor I. et al (2010) Challenges and enabling technologies for energy aware mobile radio networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(11): 66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Palit, R., Ward, P., Singh, A., & Naik, S. (2008). Energy-aware co-operative (ECO) relay-based packet transmission in wireless networks. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (pp. 2875–2880). Las Vegas, USA.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Madan R., Mehta N. B., Molisch A. F., Zhang J. (2008) Energy-efficient cooperative relaying over fading channels with simple relay selection. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 7(8): 3013–3025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, C. Y., & Hwang, G. U. (2010). Minimum energy consumption design of a two-hop relay network for QoS guarantee. In IEEE Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS) (pp. 1–6). Tampa, USA.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mehta N. B., Sharma V., Bansal G. (2011) Performance analysis of a cooperative system with rateless codes and buffered relays. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 10(4): 1069–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hwang, Y. T., Tsai, C. Y., & Lin, C. C. (2005). Block-wise adaptive modulation for OFDM WLAN systems. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (pp. 6098–6101). Kobe, Japan.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu, C., Xiangming, W., Xinqi, L., & Wei, Z. (2009). Research on the modulation and coding scheme in LTE TDD wireless network. In IEEE International Conference on Industrial Mechatronics and Automation (ICIMA) (pp. 468–471). Chengdu, China.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    3GPP TR 25.913. (2010). Requirements for evolved UTRA (E-UTRA) and evolved UTRAN (E-UTRAN) (pp. 1–20).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaos Nomikos
    • 1
  • Dimitrios N. Skoutas
    • 1
  • Demosthenes Vouyioukas
    • 1
  • Christos Verikoukis
    • 2
  • Charalabos Skianis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communication Systems EngineeringUniversity of the AegeanSamosGreece
  2. 2.Telecommunications Technological Centre of Catalonia (CTTC)CastelldefelsSpain

Personalised recommendations