Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 561–582 | Cite as

Understanding Link Behavior of Non-intrusive Wireless Body Sensor Networks

  • Rune Hylsberg Jacobsen
  • Kim Kortermand
  • Qi Zhang
  • Thomas Skjødeberg Toftegaard


The wireless body sensor network (BSN) is used to detect and transmit physiological data such as vital signs by using radio wave communication. It offers a large saving potential for future healthcare applications because hospitalization of patients with chronic diseases can be kept at a minimum. The radio wave communication on the human body is impacted by the dielectric properties, the posture, and the movement of the body. Under these conditions a highly dynamic link-state and link quality are observed. In this paper we present a study of the link layer behavior of wireless BSNs operating at 2.45 GHz. We report on a wearable body-centric network operation in realistic environments from which we characterize the wireless channels based on a novel test framework. Our test framework uses a 200 ms time resolution for sampling of the wireless links between on-body sensor nodes. We record the received signal strength indicator and link quality indicator values as well as the packet delivery statistics in real-time. Based on recorded experiments we quantify the potential packet delivery performance and energy gain that can be obtained by using dynamic routing and adaptive transmission power schemes, respectively. Subsequently we formulate a set of requirements for the next revision of our prototype wireless BSN developed at Aarhus University School of Engineering in Denmark.


Body sensor networks Radio link Routing protocols 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alekseev, S. I., Radzievsky, A. A., Szabo, I., & Ziskin, M. C. (2005). Local heating of human skin by millimeter waves: Effect of blood flow. Bioelectromagnetics, 26(6), 489–501. URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.10137/abstract.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alipour, S., Parvaresh, F., Ghajari, H., & Donald, F. K. (2010). Propagation characteristics for a 60 ghz wireless body area network (wban). In Military communications conference, 2010—MILCOM 2010 (pp. 719–723). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2010.5680295.
  3. 3.
    Benoît, L., Braem, B., Moerman, I., Blondia, C., & Demeester, P. (2011). A survey on wireless body area networks. Wireless Networks, 17(1), 1–18. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11276-010-0252-4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braem, B., Latre, B., Blondia, C., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2008). Improving reliability in multi-hop body sensor networks. In Sensor Technologies and Applications, 2008. SENSORCOMM ’08. Second international conference on (pp. 342–347). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SENSORCOMM.2008.47.
  5. 5.
    Cerpa, A., Wong, J. L., Potkonjak, M., & Estrin, D. (2005). Temporal properties of low power wireless links: modeling and implications on multi-hop routing. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing, MobiHoc ’05 (pp. 414–425). ACM: New York, NY, USA. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1062689.1062741.
  6. 6.
    Chen, M., Gonzalez, S., Vasilakos, A., Cao, H., & Leung, V. C. (2011). Body area networks: A survey. Mobile Networks Applications, 16(2), 171–193. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11036-010-0260-8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cotton, S. L., Conway, G. A., & Scanlon, W. G. (2009). A time-domain approach to the analysis and modeling of on-body propagation characteristics using synchronized measurements at 2.45 ghz. Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on, 57(4), 943. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2009.2014521.
  8. 8.
    Feychting, M., Ahlbom, A., & Kheifets, L. (2005). Emf and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26(1), 165–189. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144445.
  9. 9.
    Freund, D., & Smeeding, T. M. (2010). The future costs of health care in ageing societies: Is the glass half full or half empty?. Ageing in Advanced Industrial States (vol. 8, pp. 173–193). Springer, Netherlands. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3553-0_8.
  10. 10.
    Hall P. S., Hao Y. (2006) Antennas and propagation for body-centric wireless communications. Artech House, Inc, Norwood, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamalainen, M., Pirinen, P., & Shelby, Z. (2007). Advanced wireless ict healthcare research. In Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit, 16th IST, 1–5. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISTMWC.2007.4299337.
  12. 12.
    Jacobsen, R. H., Hansen, F. O., Madsen, J. K., Karstoft, H., Mikkelsen, P. H., Skogberg, T. A., Rasmussen, E. S., Andersen, C., Alrøe, M., & Toftegaard, T. S. (2011). A modular platform for wireless body area network research an real-life experiments. International Journal On Advances in Networks and Services, 4(3 & 4).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jia, F., Shi, Q., Mo Zhou, G., & Feng Mo, L. (2010). Packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In Multimedia technology (ICMT), 2010 International conference on (pp. 1–4). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICMULT.2010.5629537.
  14. 14.
    Kortermand, K., Jacobsen, R. H., & Toftegaard, T. S. (2011). Routing analysis of wireless body area networks using path availability measurements. In 4th International conference on biomedical engineering and informatics, vol. 3 (pp. 1386–1391).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, Y. D., Jeong, D. U., & Lee, H. J. (2010). Performance analysis of wireless link quality in wireless sensor networks. In Computer sciences and convergence information technology (ICCIT), 2010 5th international conference on (pp. 1006–1010). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT.2010.5711208.
  16. 16.
    Levis, P., Madden, S., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Whitehouse, K., Woo, A., Gay, D., Hill, J., Welsh, M., Brewer, E., & Culler, D. (2005). TinyOS: An operating system for sensor networks. Ambient Intelligence (pp. 115–148). Springer, Berlin. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27139-2_7.
  17. 17.
    Liolios, C., Doukas, C., Fourlas, G., & Maglogiannis, I. (2010). An overview of body sensor networks in enabling pervasive healthcare and assistive environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on PErvasive technologies related to assistive environments, PETRA ’10 (pp. 43:1–43:10). ACM: New York, NY, USA. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1839294.1839346.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Natarajan, A., de Silva, B., Yap, K. K., & Motani, M. (2009). Link layer behavior of body area networks at 2.4 ghz. In Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, MobiCom ’09 (pp. 241–252). ACM: New York, NY, USA. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1614320.1614347.
  20. 20.
    Natarajan, A., Silva, B. D., Yap, K. K., & Motani, M. (2009). To hop or not to hop: network architecture for body sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th annual IEEE communications society conference on sensor, mesh and ad hoc communications and networks, SECON’09 (pp. 682–690). IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, USA. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SAHCN.2009.5168978.
  21. 21.
    Patel, M., & Wang, J. (2010). Applications, challenges, and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies. Wireless Communications, IEEE, 17(1), 80–88. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2010.5416354.
  22. 22.
    Ryckaert, J., Doncker, P. D., Meys, R., de Le Hoye, A., & Donnay, S. (2004). Channel model for wireless communication around human body. Electronics Letters, 40(9), 543. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:20040386.
  23. 23.
    Shah, R. C., Nachman, L., & yih Wan, C. (2008). On the performance of bluetooth and ieee 802.15.4 radios in a body area network. In Proceedings of the ICST 3rd international conference on Body area networks, BodyNets ’08 (pp. 25:1–25:9). ICST, Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. ICST: Brussels, Belgium, Belgium. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1460257.1460291.
  24. 24.
    Shah, R. C., & Yarvis, M. (2006). Characteristics of on-body 802.15.4 networks. In Wireless mesh networks, 2006. WiMesh 2006. 2nd IEEE workshop on (p. 138). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WIMESH.2006.288612.
  25. 25.
    Srinivasan, K., Dutta, P., Tavakoli, A., & Levis, P. (2006). Understanding the causes of packet delivery success and failure in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on embedded networked sensor systems, SenSys ’06 (pp. 419–420). ACM: New York, NY, USA. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1182807.1182885.
  26. 26.
    Srinivasan, K., & Levis, P. (2006). Rssi is under appreciated. In Proceedings of the third workshop on embedded networked sensors (EmNets). URL http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/emnets/papers/levisEmnets06.pdf.
  27. 27.
    Timmons, N. F., & Scanlon, W. G. (2004). Analysis of the performance of ieee 802.15.4 for medical sensor body area networking. In Sensor and ad hoc communications and networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004. 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on (pp. 16–24). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SAHCN.2004.1381898.
  28. 28.
    Tseng, H. W., Pang, A. C., Chen, J., & Kuo, C. F. (2009). An adaptive contention control strategy for ieee 802.15.4-based wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(9), 5164–5173. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2009.2023791.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ullah, S., Higgins, H., Braem, B., Latre, B., Blondia, C., Moerman, I., Saleem, S., Rahman, Z., & Kwak, K. (2010). A comprehensive survey of wireless body area networks. Journal of Medical Systems pp. 1–30. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9571-3. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9571-3.
  30. 30.
    Wagner, S., & Nielsen, C. (2009). Opencare project: An open, flexible and easily extendible infrastructure for pervasive healthcare assisted living solutions. In 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, 2009. PervasiveHealth 2009, p. 1. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2009.5992.
  31. 31.
    Xiao, S., Dhamdhere, A., Sivaraman, V., & Burdett, A. (2009). Transmission power control in body area sensor networks for healthcare monitoring. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 27(1), 37. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2009.090105.
  32. 32.
    Zasowski, T., Althaus, F., Stager, M., Wittneben, A., & Troster, G. (2003). Uwb for noninvasive wireless body area networks: Channel measurements and results. In 2003 IEEE conference on ultra wideband systems and technologies (pp. 285–289). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/UWBST.2003.1267849.
  33. 33.
    Zhao, J., & Govindan, R. (2003). Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems (pp. 1–13). ACM: New York, NY, USA. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/958491.958493.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rune Hylsberg Jacobsen
    • 1
  • Kim Kortermand
    • 2
  • Qi Zhang
    • 1
  • Thomas Skjødeberg Toftegaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EngineeringAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.ProInnovationAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations