Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 68, Issue 4, pp 1923–1942 | Cite as

NFC Loyal for Enhancing Loyalty Services Through Near Field Communication



Near Field Communication (NFC) as an emerging technology is currently leveraged by large standardization efforts and tries to find a suitable ecosystem. NFC enabled mobile devices with integrated smart cards introduce compelling opportunities and new business models. Development of new standards such as secure element (SE), smart card, secure channel, as well as JavaCard enables creating new ecosystems using a concurrent multi application platform which takes advantage of GlobalPlatform standards. We proposed NFC Loyal, which maintains storage, retrieval, and sharing among payment and loyalty applications through our proposed structure, called as Secure Common Domain Management (SCDM) system. SCDM as a centralized database management system on the SE stores valuable information provided by payment applications and shares them with loyalty applications through a secure channel. The direct outcome of using NFC Loyal is the increase in repeat purchases of customers; as well as being a beneficial business plan realized among the payment firms, loyalty firms, and the card owner, resulting in a win-win business model. In this study, we describe NFC Loyal model with its technical infrastructure, and present the NFC Loyal model’s life cycle management on SE.


NFC Loyalty Smart card Secure common domain management NFC Loyal 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Smart Card Alliance. (2011). About smart cards, frequently asked questions. http://www.smartcardalliance.org/pages/smart-cards-faq. Accessed 10 Jan 2011.
  2. 2.
    Coskun V., Ok K., Ozdenizci B. (2012) Near field communication: From theory to practice. Wiley, London (under publication)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang Y., Chang C., Hung Y., Tsai C. (2010) NCASH: NFC pPhone-enabled personalized context awareness smart-home environment. Cybernetics and Systems 41(2): 123–145MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ortiz S. Jr. (2006) Is near-field communication close to success?. Computer 39(3): 18–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    GlobalPlatform. (2011). GlobalPlatform card specification, ver. 2.2. http://www.globalplatform.org. Accessed 10 January 2011.
  6. 6.
    Mobey Forum. (2011). Best Practice for Mobile Financial Services—Enrolment Business Model Analysis, White Paper. Available at: http://www.mobeyforum.org/Press-Documents/White-papers. Accessed 10 Dec 2011.
  7. 7.
    Choudhary, B., & Risikko, J. (2005). Mobile device security element: key findings from technical analysis v. 1.0. Mobey Forum.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sauveron D. (2009) Multi-application smart card: Towards an open smart card?. Information Security Technical Report 14(2): 70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharp B., Sharp A. (1997) Loyalty programs and thei impact on repeat-purchase loyalty patterns. International Journal of Research in Marketing 14(5): 473–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meyer-Waarden L. (2007) The effects of loyalty programs on customer lifetime duration and share of wallet. Journal of Retailing 83(2): 223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ozdenizci, B., Coskun, V., Aydin, M. N., & Ok, K. (2010). NFC loyal: A beneficial model to promote loyalty services on smart cards of NFC-enabled mobile devices (pp 134–139). London: IEEE International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiechert, T. J. P., Schaller, A., Thiesse, F., & Fleisch, E. (2009). NFC Based Service innovation in retail: An explorative study. In 17th European conference on information systems. Verona: ECIS.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    GlobalPlatform. (2011). GlobalPlatform’s proposition for NFC mobile: Secure element management and messaging. http://www.globalplatform.org/. Accessed 10 Jan 2011.
  14. 14.
    Markantonakis K., Mayes K. (2003) An overview of the GlobalPlatform smart card specification. Information Security Technical Report 8(1): 17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reveilhac, M., & Pasquet M. (2009). Promising secure element alternatives for NFC Technology. In First international workshop on near field communication (pp 75–80). Hagenberg.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Markantonakis, K., & Mayes, K. (2011). A secure channel protocol for multi-application smart cards based on public key cryptography. Information Security Group Smart Card Centre.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    StoLPaN. (2011). Description of the life-cycle management of NFC applications. Resource document. StoLPaN. http://www.nfc-forum.org/resources/white_papers/Stolpan_White_Paper_08.pdf, Accessed 10 Aug 2011.
  18. 18.
    Ok, K., Coskun, V., Ozdenizci, B., & Aydın, M. N. (2012). A role based service level NFC ecosystem model. Journal of Wireless Personal Communications (under publication).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Madlmayr, G., Dillinger, O., Langer, J., & Schaffer, C. (2007). The benefit of using SIM application toolkit in the context of near field communication applications. International Conference on the Management of Mobile Business (Vol. 5).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W3C Recommendation. (2011). Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/. Accesssed 10 Jan 2011.
  21. 21.
    XML Query Language. (2011). http://www.xquery.com/. Accessed 10 Jan 2011.
  22. 22.
    Srivastava, J. (2011). Data mining for customer relationship management. http://www.dtc.umn.edu/ddmc/resources/crm.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NFC Lab ISTANBUL, Department of Information TechnologiesISIK UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Arts and SciencesISIK UniversitySile, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations