On Opportunistic Power Control for Alamouti and SM MIMO Systems
- 109 Downloads
Transmit antenna diversity and single user spatial multiplexing have become attractive in practical systems, because they achieve performance gains without requiring sophisticated channel state information (CSI) feedback mechanisms. On the other hand, when fast and accurate CSI at the transmitter is available, opportunistic power control (OPC) is an attractive alternative to signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio (SINR) target following approaches, because it maximizes throughput by taking advantage of fast channel variations. In this paper we examine the question whether OPC is worth the pain of obtaining fast CSI by evaluating the gains of OPC for the downlink of a system employing multiple input multiple output (MIMO) systems with Alamouti and open loop spatial multiplexing (SM). We formulate the OPC problem as a throughput maximization task subject to power budget and fairness constraints. We solve this task by the Augmented Lagrangian Penalty Function and find that without fairness constraints, OPC in concert with SM provides superior throughput. With increasingly tight fairness constraints, Alamouti along with equal power allocation becomes a viable alternative to the SM OPC scheme. Both from fairness and throughput perspectives, Alamouti along with OPC is particularly efficient when adaptive MCS is employed and users with large differences in channel qualities have to share the total transmit power.
KeywordsOPC MIMO Alamouti STBC Spatial multiplexing Fairness
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Knopp, R., & Humblet, P. A. (1995). Information capacity and power control in single cell multiuser communications. IEEE international conference on communications, ICC’95. doi: 10.1109/ICC.1995.525188.
- 4.Fodor, G., Johansson, M., & Soldati, P. (2010) Near optimum power control and precoding under fairness constraints in network MIMO systems. International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting. doi: 10.1155/2010/251719.
- 5.Reider, N., Fodor, G., & Rácz, A. (2010). Opportunistic target SINR setting for the MIMO broadcast channel. 16th European wireless conference. doi: 10.1109/EW.2010.5483406.
- 7.Lim, A. W. C., & Lau, V. K. N. (2006). On the fundamental tradeoff of spatial diversity and spatial multiplexing of MIMO links with imperfect CSIT. IEEE international symposium on information theory doi: 10.1109/ISIT.2006.262145.
- 10.Stupia, I., Giannetti, F., Lottici, V., & Vandendorpe, L. (2009). A novel link performance prediction method for coded MIMO-OFDM systems. IEEE wireless communications and networking conference, WCNC’09. doi: 10.1109/WCNC.2009.4917526.
- 15.Brüninghaus, K., Astely, D., Sälzer, T., Visuri, S., Alexiu, A., Karger, S., et al. (2005). Link performance models for system level simulations of broadband radio access systems. IEEE 16th international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, PIMRC’05. doi: 10.1109/PIMRC.2005.1651855.
- 16.Proakis J. (2000) Digital communications. 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 17.Wan, L., Tsai, S., & Almgren, M. (2006). A fading-insensitive performance metric for a unified link quality model. IEEE wireless communications and networking conference, WCNC’06. doi: 10.1109/WCNC.2006.1696622.
- 18.Rácz, A., Reider, N., & Fodor, G. (2008). On the impact of inter-cell interference in LTE. IEEE 50th global communications conference, GLOBECOM’08. doi: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2008.ECP.1038.
- 19.Reider, N., Rácz, A., & Fodor, G. (2009). On scheduling and power control in multi-cell coordinated clusters. IEEE 51st global communications conference GLOBECOM’09. doi: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2009.5425622.
- 20.Jain, R. K., Chiu, D.-M. W., & Hawe, W. R. (1984). A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation and shared computer system. Technical report DEC-TR-301. Digital Equipment Corporation.Google Scholar