Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 49–69 | Cite as

Internet of Things: Applications and Challenges in Technology and Standardization

  • Debasis Bandyopadhyay
  • Jaydip SenEmail author


The phrase Internet of Things (IoT) heralds a vision of the future Internet where connecting physical things, from banknotes to bicycles, through a network will let them take an active part in the Internet, exchanging information about themselves and their surroundings. This will give immediate access to information about the physical world and the objects in it—leading to innovative services and increase in efficiency and productivity. This paper studies the state-of-the-art of IoT and presents the key technological drivers, potential applications, challenges and future research areas in the domain of IoT. IoT definitions from different perspective in academic and industry communities are also discussed and compared. Finally some major issues of future research in IoT are identified and discussed briefly.


Internet of Things (IoT) Interoperability Security Privacy Network protoocl Wireless networks 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Santucci, G. (2009). From internet to data to internet of things. In Proceedings of the international conference on future trends of the internet.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atzori L., Lera A., Morabito G. (2010) The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks 54(15): 2787–2805zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heuser L., Nochta Z., Trunk N.-C. (2008) ICT shaping the world: A scientific view. ETSI, Wiley Publication, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    INFSO D.4 (2008) Networked enterprise and RFID INFSO G.2 Micro and nanosystems. In: Co-operation with the working group RFID of the ETP EPOSS, internet of things in 2020, roadmap for the future, Version 1.1, May 27.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    The EPCglobal Architecture Framework. EPCglobal Final Version 1.3, Approved 19 March, 2009. (2009).
  7. 7.
    Sakamura, K. (2006). Challenges in the age of ubiquitous computing: A case study of T-Engine—an open development platform for embedded systems. In: Proceedings of ICSE’06. Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunkels, A., & Vasseur, J. P. (2009). IP for smart objects, internet protocol for smart objects (ISO) alliance, White Paper #1.
  9. 9.
    Hui, J., Culler, D., & Chakrabarti, S. (2009). 6LoWPAN: Incorporating IEEE 802.15.4 into IP architecture–internet protocol for smart objects (IPSO) Alliance, White Paper # 3.
  10. 10.
    Toma, I., Simperl, E., & Hench, G. (2009). A joint roadmap for semantic technologies and the internet of things. In: Proceedings of the 3rd STI Roadmapping Workshop. Crete, Greece.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katasonov, A., Kaykova, O., Khriyenko, O., Nikitin, S., & Terziyan, V. (2008). Smart semantic middleware for the internet of things. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics. Funchal, Mederia, Portugal.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wahlster, W. (2008). Web 3.0: semantic technologies for the internet of services and of things. Lecture at the 2008 dresden future forum.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vazquez I. (2009) Social devices: Semantic technology for the internet of things. Week@ESI, Zamudio, SpainGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guinard, D., & Vlad, T. (2009). Towards the web of things: Web Mashups for embedded devices. In: Proceedings of the international world wide web conference (WWW 2009). Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pasley J. (2005) How BPEL and SOA are changing web services development. IEEE Internet Computing 9(3): 65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    OASIS Standard: Web-Services Dynamic Discovery, version 1.1.
  17. 17.
    Bonjour Protocol Specification.
  18. 18.
    Simple Service Discovery Protocol/1.0. Operating without an Arbiter.
  19. 19.
    Contiki: The operating system for connecting next billion devices- the internet of things.
  20. 20.
    European Telecommunication Telecommunications Standards Institute.
  21. 21.
    Shelby, Z. ETSI M2M Standardization, March, 2009.
  22. 22.
    Kushalnagar, N., Montenegro, G., & Schumacher C. (August 2009). IPv6 over Lo-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs): Overview, assumptions, problem statement, and goals, IETF RFC 4919.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Santucci, G. (September 2009). Internet of the future and internet of things: What is at stake and how are we getting prepared for them? In: eMatch’99- Future internet workshop, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Kelesidis T., Kelesidis I., Rafailidis P., Falagas M. (2007) Counterfeit or substandard antimicrobial drugs: A review of the scientific drugs: A review of the scientific evidence. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 60(2): 214–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hardgrave, B. C., Waller, M., & Miller, R. (2006). RFID’s impact on out of stocks: A sales velocity analysis, Research Report from the University of Arkansas.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gruen, T. W., Corsten, D. S., & Bharadwaj, S. (2002). Retail out of stocks, Technical Report.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fewtrell, P., & Hirst, I. L. (1998). A review of high-cost chemical/petrochemical accidents since Flixborough 1974. In Loss Prevention Bulletin (1998), April, No. 140.
  29. 29.
    Coroama, V. (2006). The smart tachograph—individual accounting of traffic costs and its implications. In: Proceedings of Pervasive 2006, (pp. 135–152). Dublin, Ireland, May 07–10.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    O’Reilly, T., & Pahlka, J. (2009). The web squarred era. Forbes, September, 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Innovation LabsTata Consultancy Services Ltd.KolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations