Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Policy Based Mobility & Flow Management for IPv6 Heterogeneous Wireless Networks


We propose a dynamic mobility management framework for Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) and policy enforcement enabled heterogenous wireless networks. Policies and policy rules are defined depending on network infrastructure facilities, service agreements and negotiation results. Each traffic is coupled with an identifiable traffic flow while the heterogenous interface flow bindings are regulated by polices. The network selection, flow distribution, handovers and mobility procedures are flexible and we propose to improve the decision making via Multiple Attributes Decision Making (MADM). Techniques considered in the framework include the IPv6 based Network Mobility (NEMO), multihoming capability, transparent vertical handovers, horizontal handovers and dynamic policy enforcement matching process to improve the Quality of Service (QoS), Quality of Experience (QoE) and ubiquitous connectivity. A experiment testbed and simulation models have been constructed to verify the mobility framework performance in a heterogeneous WiFi, WiMax and UMTS hybrid environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Agarwal, S., Chuah, C., & Katz, R. (2003). OPCA: Robust interdomain policy routing and traffic control. In Proceedings of OPENARCH.

  2. 2.

    Bari, F. & Leung, V. (2006). Service delivery over heterogeneous wireless networks: Network selecton aspects. In: Proceedings of ACM IWCMC. Vancouver, Canada.

  3. 3.

    Choi, H. & Limb, J. (1999). A behavioral model of web traffic. IEEE International Conference of Network Protocol.

  4. 4.

    Cui, H. et al. (2008). Heterogeneous network selection using a novel multi-attribute decision method. In 3rd Conference on communications and networking (pp. 153–157).

  5. 5.

    Cui H. et al (2008) Heterogeneous network selection using a novel multi attribute decision method. IEEE Communications and Networking, Beijing, China

  6. 6.

    Devarapalli, V., Wakikawa, R., Petrescu, A., & Thubert, P. (2005). Network mobility (NEMO) basic support protocol, IETF RFC 3963.

  7. 7.

    Duch, W. (2003). What is computational intelligence and what could it become? Computational Intelligence, Methods and Applications Lecture Notes NTU, Singapour.

  8. 8.

    Durham, D. et al. (2000). The COPS (Common open policy service) Protocol. Comments 2748, IETF.

  9. 9.

    Eronen, P. (2006). IKEv2 mobility and multihoming protocol (MOBIKE), RFC 4555, IEFT.

  10. 10.

    He, F. & Wang, F. (2007). A cost sensitive best network selection scheme in heterogeneous wireless networks. In International Conference on wireless communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (pp. 21–25).

  11. 11.

    Hwang C., Yoon K. (1995) Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA

  12. 12.

    Irvine, J. (2002). Adam smith goes mobile: Managing serviced beyond 3G with the digital marketplace. European Wireless Conference. Florence, Italy.

  13. 13.

    Iyer, A., & Iyer, J. (2009). Handling mobility across WiFi and WiMAX, 5th ACM international wireless communications and mobile computing conference. Leipzig, Germany.

  14. 14.

    Lach, H., Janneteau, C., & Petrescu, A. (2003). Network mobility in beyond-3G systems, IEEE Communications Magazine.

  15. 15.

    Laganier, J., Narayanan, S., & McCann, P. (2008). Interface between a Proxy MIPv6 mobility access gateway and a mobile node, IETF Internet Draft.

  16. 16.

    Leung, F. B. (2007). Use of non-monotonic utility in multi-attribute network selection, Wireless Telecommunications Symposium, pp. 1C 8.

  17. 17.

    McKeown, N., Anderson, T., & Balakrishnan, H. et al. (2008). OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM, Computer Communication Review, 38(2).

  18. 18.

    Multiple CoA draft, http://software.nautilus6.org/MCoA/.

  19. 19.

    Pries, R., Mader, A., & Staehle, D. (2006). A network architecture for a policy-based handover across heterogeneous networks. OPNETWORK Washington DC, USA.

  20. 20.

    Shen, C. (2008). Management framework for hybrid wireless networks, Ph.D. Thesis, Cork Institute of Technology, Cork, Ireland.

  21. 21.

    Shima, K. et al. (2007). SHISA: The mobile IPv6/NEMO BS stack implementation current status. In Asia BSD Conference (ASIABSDCON). Tokyo, Japan.

  22. 22.

    Soliman, H. et al. (2007). Flow bindings in mobile IPv6 and nemo basic support, IEFT draft.

  23. 23.

    Varga, A. (1999). Using the OMNeT++ discrete event simulation system in education. IEEE Transcation, on Education, 42(4).

  24. 24.

    Wang, Q., Atkinson, R., & Dunlop, J. (2008) Design and evaluation of flow handoff signalling for multihomed mobile nodes in wireless overlay networks. (Elsevier) Computer Networks, 52(8), 1647–1674

  25. 25.

    WiMax Forum. (2006). Mobile WiMax-Part II: A compratative analysis.

  26. 26.

    WiMax Forum. (2007). A comparative analysis of mobile WiMax deployment alternatives in the access network.

  27. 27.

    Wang H., Katz R., Giese J. (1999) Policy-enabled handoffs across heterogeneous wireless networks. ACM WMCSA, LA

  28. 28.

    3rd Generation Partnership Project, Technical Specification Group RAN, Working Group 2 (TSG RAN WG2). (1999). General UMTS architecture, 3G 23.101 v3.0.1.

  29. 29.

    3rd Generation Partnership Project. (2005). 3GPP system to Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) interworking System description, TS 23.234 v6.4.0.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Wencai Du.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, C., Du, W., Atkinson, R. et al. Policy Based Mobility & Flow Management for IPv6 Heterogeneous Wireless Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 62, 329–361 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-010-0056-y

Download citation


  • Policy enforcement
  • Decision making
  • Flow distribution
  • Mobility
  • Heterogenous wireless networks
  • Quality of service
  • Quality of experience