Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 423–434 | Cite as

A Context Driven Architecture for Cognitive Radio Nodes

Article

Abstract

A cognitive radio (CR), in its generic form, needs to be highly flexible and adaptive while desirably hiding its complexities from users and system programmers. For the autonomic management the CR needs to be aware of the ‘self’ and the ‘world’ around it. Embedded intelligence with cognitive and collaborative adaptations require innovative techniques for managing the functionality of the device. Complexity of the cognitive processes involved demand for formal methods for run time evaluations and verification. In this paper we propose a generic architecture for a cognitive node with a context driven approach which incorporates some formalisms including context spaces, ontology, process algebra to represent and manipulate various cognitive processes managing the cognitive node functionality.

Keywords

Cognitive radio Ontology Semantic web Context awareness Process Algebra 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mitola III J. and Maguire G. (1999). Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 6(4): 13–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nehaniv, C. L. (1997). Algebraic models for understanding: coordinate systems and cognitive empowerment, ct, p. 147, Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology (CT ‘97), 1997, http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/CT.1997.617694
  3. 3.
    Sontag E.D. (2004). Some new directions in control theory inspired by systems biology. Systems Biology. IEE Proceedings 1(1): 9–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ledeczi, A., & Karsai, G. (2000). Synthesis of self-adaptive software. Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference. CD-ROM Reference 10.0304, Big Sky, MT, March 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang Y. (2002). The real time process algebra (RTPA). Annals of Software Engineering 14: 235–274 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Y. (2003). Using process algebra to describe human and software behaviors. Brain and Mind 4: 199–213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopez, N., Nunez, M., & Pelayo, F. L. (2004). STOPA: A stochastic process algebra for the formal representation of cognitive systems. Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics 2004, 16–17 Aug. 2004, (pp. 64–73).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atallah, L., & Eberbach, E. (2005). The $-Calculus process algebra of bounded rational agents applied to selected problems in bioinformatics. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems CIRAS’05. Singapore, Dec. 13–16, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGuinness, D. L., & Harmelen F. (2004). OWL web ontology language overview, W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Mei, J., & Paslaru Bontas, E. (2005). Reasoning paradigms for SWRL-enabled ontologies. Proceedings of International Workshop on Protege with Rules. July 2005, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Devitt, A., Danev, B., & Matusikova, K. (2006). Constructing Bayesian networks automatically using ontologies. Proceedings of Formal Ontologies Meet Industry (FOMI). 14 Dec. 2006, Trento, Italy.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, X. H., Gu, T., Zhang, D. Q., & Pung, H. K. (2004). Ontology-based context modelling and reasoning using OWL. Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications- Percom 2004, 14–17 March. 2004, (pp. 18–22).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Henricksen, K., Livingstone, S., & Indulska, J. (2004). Towards a hybrid approach to context modelling, reasoning, and interoperation. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Advanced Context Modelling, Reasoning And Management. UbiComp’2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Embedded Systems Innovation LabTata Consultancy ServicesBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Center for Teleinfrastruktur (CTIF)Aalborg UniversityAalborg ØstDenmark

Personalised recommendations