Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 215–227 | Cite as

Combined Transmitter Diversity and Multi-Level Modulation Techniques

  • Slimane Ben slimane
Article

Abstract

Orthogonal transmitter diversity such as frequency diversity and time diversity is quite simple to implement and, with optimum signal combining, can take full advantage of fading multipath channels. However, such a scheme has a bandwidth efficiency that decreases inversely with the number of diversity branches making it less attractive in wireless communications applications. This paper considers combined orthogonal transmitter diversity and multi-level linear modulation techniques. The idea is to view the signal constellations of the modulation scheme in an augmented signal space formed by the modulation signal dimension and the number of branches of the transmitter diversity scheme. This augmented signal space provides a good spread for the modulation signal points and can be quite efficient for high-level linear modulation techniques. The obtained results show that this combined scheme, not only improves the system performance on both additive white Gaussian noise and fading multipath channels, but also improves the bandwidth efficiency of orthogonal transmitter diversity.

Keywords

orthogonal transmitter diversity multi-level linear modulation diversity gain bandwidth efficiency wireless communications 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.A. Ali and I. Al-Kadi, “On the use or Repetition Coding with Binary Digital Modulation on Mobile Channels”, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technology, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 14–18, February 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Z. Liu, Y. Xin, and G.B. Giannakis, “Linear Constellation Precoding for OFDM with Maximum Diversity and Coding Gains”, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 416–426, March 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ETSI, “Broadband Radio Access Networks (BRAN); HIPERLAN Type 2; Physical (PHY) layer”, ETSI TS 101 475, Vol 1.1.1, April 2000.Google Scholar
  4. ETSI, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Framing Structure, Channel Coding and Modulation for Digital Terrestrial Television (DVB-T)”, (Final Draft) Prevision ETS 300 744, November 1996.Google Scholar
  5. R.V. Nee and R. Prasad, OFDM for Wireless Multimedia Communications Arthech House Publishers, December 1999.Google Scholar
  6. E. Biglieri, D. Divsalar, P.J. McLane, and M.K. Simon, Introduction to Trellis-Coded Modulation with Applications Macmillan Publishing Company, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. X. Giraud and J.C. Belfiore, “Constellations Matched to the Rayleigh Fading Channel”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 106–115, January 1996.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Correira, A. Hottinen, and R. Wichman, “Optimized Constellations for Transmitter Diversity”, IEEE VTC 1999, pp. 1785–1789, May 1999.Google Scholar
  9. J.-C. Guey, M.P. Fitz, M.R. Bell, and W.-Y. Kuo, “Signal Design for Transmitter Diversity Wireless Communication Systems Over Rayleigh Fading Channels”, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 527–537, April 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Wengerter, A.G.E. Von Elbwart, E. Seidel, G. Velev, and M.P. Schmitt, “Advanced Hybrid ARQ Technique Employing a Signal Constellation Rearrangement”, IEEE VTC2002-Fall, September 2002.Google Scholar
  11. C. Wengerter, A.G.E. Von Elbwart, and E. Seidel, “Constellation Rearrangement: Enhancement for Multilevel Modulation Formats and Transmit Diversity”, Wireless Personal Commun., Vol. 29, pp. 35–45, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. John G. Proakis, Digital Communications fourth edition, McGraw-Hill, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. S.M. Alamouti, “A Simple Transmit Diversity Technique for Wireless Communications”, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun. Vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 1451–1458, October 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. S.B. Slimane and T. Le-Ngoc, “Tight Bounds on the Error Probability of Coded Modulation Schemes in Rayleigh Fading Channels”, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technology Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 121–130, February 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radio Communication Systems, Department of Signals, Sensors, and SystemsThe Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations