Advertisement

Wireless Personal Communications

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 69–86 | Cite as

A New Technique to Expedite RSVP Path Re-establishments in 802.11 Wireless LANs

  • Nikos Passas
  • Apostolis K. Salkintzis
  • Georgios Nikolaidis
  • Mary Katsamani
Article

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel scheme that exploits the Inter Access Point Protocol (IAPP), currently standardized by IEEE, in order to expedite the RSVP path re-establishment that takes place after a handover from one WLAN Access Point (AP) to another. The prime characteristic of this scheme is that a WLAN AP serves as an RSVP proxy and starts RSVP signaling on behalf of the Mobile Node much earlier compared with the standard RSVP operation in a WLAN. Therefore, a considerable handover latency reduction can be achieved, which can be as high as 20%. To evaluate the performance and the benefits of the proposed scheme, we display and discuss a series of simulation results. In addition, we present in detail its operation and we discuss the RSVP objects that should be transferred across APs through IAPP. In this context, we also explain the structure of the proposed RSVP Information Elements. Our simulation results show considerable performance improvement, especially in heavy traffic load conditions. Note that the proposed scheme can work with the standard RSVP protocol, as well as with partial path re-establishment methods and can be combined with advanced admission control algorithms in the AP.

Keywords

RSVP wireless LANs (WLANs) IAPP handover 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    IEEE Std. 802.11, “IEEE Standard for Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications”, November 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    IEEE Std. 802.1 If/Draft 5, “Draft Recommended Practice for Multi-Vendor Access Point Interoperability via an Inter-Access Point Protocol Across Distribution Systems Supporting IEEE 802.11 Operation”, January 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Braden et al., “Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview”, RFC 1633, June 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Braden et al., “Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)—Version 1 Functional Specification”, RFC2205, September 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.O. Awduche and E. Agu, “Mobile Extensions to RSVP”, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, Las Vegas, Nevada, September 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Talukdar et al., “MRSVP: A Resource Reservation Protocol for an Integrated Services Network with Mobile Hosts”, The Journal of Wireless Networks, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Das, R. Jayaram, N. Kakani and S. Sen, “A Resource Reservation Mechanism for Mobile Nodes in the Internet”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC) Spring 1999, Huston, Texas, May 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.-C. Tseng et al., “HMRSVP: A Hierarchical Mobile RSVP Protocol”, in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing (WNMC) 2001, Valencia, Spain, April 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.-S. Kuo and P.-C. Ko, “Dynamic RSVP for Mobile IPv6 in Wireless Networks”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC) 2000, Tokyo, Japan, May 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.-T. Chen and L.-C. Huang, “RSVP Mobility Support: A Signalling Protocol for Integrated Services Internet with Mobile Hosts”, in Proceedings of the INFOCOM 2000, Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Hadjiefthymiades, S. Paskalis, G. Fankhauser and L. Merakos, “Mobility management in an IP-based wireless ATM network”, in Proceedings of ACTS Mobile Summit, June 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Paskalis et al., “An Efficient RSVP/Mobile IP Interworking Scheme”, ACM Mobile Networks Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, June 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Moon and A.H. Aghvami, “Reliable RSVP Path Reservation for Multimedia Communications Under IP Micro Mobility Scenario”, IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, October 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Rigney et al., “Remote Authentication Dial in User Service (RADIUS)”, RFC 2865, June 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Wroclawski et al., “The Use of RSVP with IETF Integrated Services”, RFC2210, September 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    OPNET Modeller Version 9.0, OPNET Web Site: http://www.opnet.com.
  17. 17.
    G. Fleming, A. El-Hoiydi, J. DeVriendt, G. Nikolaidis, F. Piolini and M. Maraki, “A Flexible Architecture for UMTS”, IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, April 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Alonistioti, G. Nikolaidis and I. Modeas, “SDL-Based Modelling and Design of IN/UMTS Handover Functionality”, in Proceedings of the SDL Forum’97, Evry, France, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B.P. Crow, I. Widjaja, J.G. Kim and P.T. Sakai, “IEEE 802.11 Wireless Local Area Networks”, IEEE Communication Magazine, September 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikos Passas
    • 1
  • Apostolis K. Salkintzis
    • 2
  • Georgios Nikolaidis
    • 1
  • Mary Katsamani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics & Telecommunications, Communication Networks LaboratoryUniversity of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.MotorolaAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations