Performance analysis of bit error rate of data link system under pulse LFM interference in time-varying rayleigh channel

  • Kui Zhao
  • Fangmin HeEmail author
  • Jin Meng
  • Hao Wu
  • Lei Zhang


In such mobile platforms as ships and aircraft, the detection and reconnaissance devices are near to the communication facilities. When working at the same time, they will create interference or jamming themselves. Especially, the high-power radar equipment tend to cause a high bit error rate (BER) in the data link system (DLS), with the result that the DLS cannot operate normally. For this reason, this paper makes a study of the BER performance of the DLS under the pulse linear frequency modulation (LFM) interference in the time-varying Rayleigh channel. In view of the the time-varying characteristics of channel in the practical conditions, the interference channel is modeled as a time-varying Rayleigh fading channel and the formula of BER is derived. Through simulation, the theoretical deduction is proved to be correct. This is of much importance to analyzing the variation of BER performance with the pulse width, power and doppler frequency shift under the pulse LFM interference.


Platforms Radar BER performance DLS LFM Time-varying 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61801501, 61801502, 71801220.


  1. 1.
    Wu, H., Wang, Q., Zhou, L., & Meng, J. (2018). Spectral fitting method for designing radar sequence with spectral nulling and correlation constraints. IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 12(11), 1260–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hao, Z. H., Zhao, H. Z., Shao, S. H., et al. (2014). A novel time-varying single tone jamming suppression method for DSSS system. Journal of Signal Processing, 30(7), 777–782.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, C. H., Zhu, J., Wang, S. L., et al. (2007). The design of IIR Filters for time-varying interference suppression in DSSS communication system. Signal Processing, 23(4), 495–499.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shen, H., & Papandreou, S. (2005). Wideband time-varying interference suppression using matched signal transforms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53(7), 2607–2612.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, X., Tan, Z.-H., Zhu, G., & Zhong, Z.-D. (2006). Doppler frequency shift estimation for rician channel in high-speed mobile communications (vol. 3).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hao, Z., Zhao, H., Shao, S., & Tang, Y. (2014). Suppression of time-varying multi-tone interference based on frequency domain interference detection. Wireless Personal Communications, 75(2), 1051–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, C., Yang, Y., & Ying, R. (2009). On the performance of DS spread-spectrum systems. In AWGN channel, 2009 international conference on communications and mobile computing (pp. 311–315).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sarnin, S. S., Kadri, N., Mozi, A. M., Wahab, N. A., & Naim, N. F. (2010). Performance analysis of BPSK and QPSK using error correcting code through AWGN. In 2010 international conference on networking and information technology (pp. 178–182).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duraisamy, P., & Nguyen, L. (2012). Performance of coded-sequence self-encoded spread spectrum under pulsed-noise jamming. In 2012 46th annual conference on information sciences and systems (CISS) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo-zhen, Z., Yuan-yuan, G., & Jing, M. (2010). Performance analysis of the cooperative DS/SS systems in single-tone interference over flat Rayleigh fading channels. In 2010 international conference on communications, circuits and systems (ICCCAS) (pp. 126–130).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, H., Pei, B., Huang, Y., & Yang, Q. (2010). Performance of the direct sequence spread spectrum system with single-tone jamming. In 2010 IEEE international conference on information theory and information security (pp. 458–461).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo, J., Andrian, J. H., & Zhou, C. (2007). Bit error rate analysis of jamming for OFDM systems. In 2007 wireless telecommunications Symposium (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma, L., Fan, C., Sun, W., & Qiao, G. (2018). Comparison of jamming methods for underwater acoustic DSSS communication systems. In 2018 2nd IEEE advanced information management, communicates, electronic and automation control conference (IMCEC) (pp. 1340–1344).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lakshmi, M. L. S. N. S., & Anudeepsagar, K. (2014). Niranjanprasad, analysis of DSSS performance under communication-jamming environment. In 2014 international conference on electronics and communication systems (ICECS) (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lv, W., Xi, X., & Du, Y. (2013). An algorithm for narrow-band interference suppression in CDMA communication system based on probability and statistics search. In 2013 international conference on information technology and applications (pp. 1–4).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xie, H., Hu, J., & Yin, W.-Y. (2014). Anti-jamming performance simulation and analysis of tactical data link communication system. In 2014 international Symposium on electromagnetic compatibility (pp. 1096–1101).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, Y., Jia, X., & Kou, B. (2015). Adaptive multi-tone jamming suppression for DSSS communications based on compressive sensing. In 2015 8th international congress on image and signal processing (CISP) (pp. 1323–1327).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu, Y.-h., Zhang, P.-h., & Deng, M.-y. (2011). Simulation research on direct sequence spread spectrum communication system over Rayleigh fading channels. In Proceedings of 2011 international conference on electronic and mechanical engineering and information technology (vol. 8, pp. 4317–4321).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xie, D. G., Liu, Q. F., An, X. Y., & Cheng, Y. B. (2014). Performance simulation and analysis of typical mode of jamming on TDLCS. In Proceedings of 2014 3rd Asia-Pacific conference on antennas and propagation (pp. 1466–1469).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dong, Y. C., Won, K. K., & Jae, H. K. (2016). Performance of analog and digital modulation schemes under sweep jamming. In International conference on ubiquitous and future networks (pp. 13–15).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao, K., He, F., Liu, H., Wang, Q., Meng, J., & Zhang, L. (2018). A multi-tone interference equivalence method for analyzing the impact of LFM interference on the BER of communications data link system. In 2018 IEEE international Symposium on electromagnetic compatibility and 2018 IEEE Asia-Pacific Symposium on electromagnetic compatibility (EMC/APEMC) (pp. 766–771).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cui, Y., & Wang, J. (2012). LFM interference suppression for GPS receiver based on oblique projection. In 2012 IEEE 11th international conference on signal processing (vol. 1, pp. 92–96).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Feng, Y. M., & Guo, Y. C. (2010). Principle of communication system. Tsinghua: Tsinghua University Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldsmith, A. (2015). Wireless communications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xiaoqiang, Q., Jin, Q., & Tao, L. (2011). Suppression of LFM inteference for DSSS communication system based on FRFT. In 2011 international conference on electronics, communications and control (ICECC) (pp. 1068–1071).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, C., Yang, Y., & Ying, R. (2009). On the performance of DS spread-spectrum systems in AWGN channel. In 2009 WRI international conference on communications and mobile computing (vol. 1, pp. 311–315).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bassem, M. R., & Atef, E. (2004). Matlab simulations for radar systems design. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gan, R. B., Zhang, W., Lan, Z., et al. (2012). Power measurement of ultra-wideband weak chrip pulse. Electronic Information and Countermeasure Technology, 27(5), 69–74.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang, T., Proakis, J. G., & Zeidler, J. R. (2007). Interference analysis of filtered multitone modulation over time-varying frequency–selective fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 55(4), 717–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li, Y., & Cimini, L. J. (2001). Bounds on the interchannel interference of OFDM in timevarying impairments. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 49(3), 401–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jarin, I., & Sharmin, R. (2017). Performance evaluation of SISO OFDM system in the presence of CFO, timing jitter and phase noise for Rayleigh and Rician fading channels. In 2017 IEEE region 10 humanitarian technology conference (R10-HTC) (pp. 498–501).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rajesh, M. N., Shrisha, B. K., Rao, N., & Kumaraswamy, H. V. (2016). An analysis of BER comparison of various digital modulation schemes used for adaptive modulation. In 2016 IEEE international conference on recent trends in electronics, information and communication technology (RTEICT) (pp. 241–245).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Vessel Integrated Power SystemNaval University of EngineeringWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations